-
2. Southern Indians and Jim Crow
- Texas A&M University Press
- Chapter
- Additional Information
CHAPTER2 SouthernIndiansandJimCr ow theda perdue In1969,MyronJonesoftheNationalCongressofAmericanIndians wenttoMarksville,Louisiana,toinvestigatethesituationofthelocal Tunica- BiloxiIndians.Theyowned130acresonwhichlocalwhiteshad encroachedbyhuntingdeer,buildingaroadandagasstation,andusing the Indians’cemeteryasagarbagedump.Jonesfoundlocalattitudes evenmoredisturbingthanviolationsoftheIndians’propertyrights:most whitesinsistedthattherewerenoIndiansinthevicinityofMarksvilledespite theiroccupationofthelandinquestionsincebeforetheLouisiana Purchase.Inhisreport,Joneswrote,“TheChairmanofthelocalpoverty program,awhitelawyer,explained. ..that‘alltheIndianshavegone. They’veeithermarriedwhiteorblack,andthat’swhattheyarenow — eitherwhiteorblack.’”Infact,Jonesdiscovered,“Inpublicofficialmatters ,noLouisianacommunityacknowledgestheexistenceofIndians.” 1 ThesamethingcouldhavebeensaidaboutcommunitiesacrosstheSoutheast .FromVirginiatoeastTexas,Nativepeoplehadsurviveddisease,dispossession ,anddiscrimination,butbythe1960snon - Indiansoutherners hadremovedmostofthemfromtheraciallandscapeoftheregion. TheabsenceofIndiansfrommid - twentieth- centuryperceptionsofthe SoutheastdiffersdramaticallyfromwhatEuropeansfoundfourcenturies earlier.Whentheyfi rstarrived,theSoutheastwasoneofthemostdensely populatedregionsofNorthAmerica.Nativepeoplesenjoyedsovereignty, whichtheyexercisedthroughpoliticalstructuresthatmanagedresources, administeredterritories,andmanipulatedspiritualforces.TheEnglish inNorthAmericarecognizedthesovereignrightsofindigenousnations intreaties,apracticethattheUnitedStatesadop tedaftertheAmerican Revolution.Inthe1830stheUnitedStatesusedtreatiestoforcefivelarge Indian nationsintheSoutheast —Cherokees, Chickasaws,Choctaws, Sem i noles,andCreeks—westoftheMississippitowhattodayiseastern ThedaPerdue 55 Oklahoma.ThenationalgovernmentsoftheseNativenationstooktheir treatyrelationswiththeUnitedStatestotheWest,andtheirhistorydiffers greatlyfromthatofthepeoplewhoremained.Somewhostayedwere remnantsofremovedtribes,buttherewerethousandsofotherIndian peoplewhosetribeshadneverbeentargetedforremoval.Theirlegalsituations werelargelythesame.AttheendoftheAmericanCivilWar,the UnitedStatesgovernmentdidnotrecognizethesovereignrightsofany tribesintheSoutheast,nordiditmaintaingovernment- to-governmentrelations withthem,asitdidwithnationsintheWest.Instead,southeastern Indianslivedunderthelawsofthestates.Forthenextcentury,state andlocalgovernmentswouldtrytoforceIndiansintoasystemofbiracial segregationthatchallengedtheiridentityasIndians,obscuredtheirhistories ,anddeniedtheirsovereignrights.Inresponse,southeasternIndians struggledtopreservetheirethnicandnationalidentities,oftenbyembracing theJimCrowsystemthatsoughttodestroyboth. SegregationstatutespassedintheaftermathofReconstructionmade fewreferencestoIndians.Segregation,afterall,soughttoprotectwhiteness andwhitepower.Lumpingallpeopleofcolortogetherachievedthe goalofpreservingwhiteracialpurityandstrengtheningwhitecontrolof southerneconomicandpoliticallife.OnlyFloridaincludedIndiansspecifically inareconstructionconstitutionbyprovidingthemwithonerepresentative ineachhouseofthelegislature.Buttheconstitutionalconvention of1885omittedthisprovision. 2 FloridaalsorecognizedtheSeminoles’ presencebyprohibitingthesaleofalcoholtoIndians,ademeaningconcession tostereotype.3 Inthe1880s,MississippiandNorthCarolinapassed lawsprovidingforseparateschoolsforIndians,butonlyNorthCarolina consistentlyofferedsegregatedstatefacilities. 4 Mostlawsthatincluded Indiansdealtwithmiscegenation. 5 In1873,NorthCarolinaprohibited unionsbetweenwhitesandeitherAfricanAmericansorIndians,andin 1879SouthCarolinaprovidedthat“marriagebetweenawhiteperson andanIndian,Negro,mulatto,mestizo,orhalf - breedshallbenulland void.”6 Subsequentlaws,includingonethatoutlawedmarriagebetween AfricanAmericansandtheLumbeeIndiansofNorthCarolina,augmented these earlyantimiscegenationstatutes. 7 Louisianaoutlawed“concubinage ”betweenIndiansandAfricanAmericansin1920butdroppedthe provisionin1942becauseitreportedly“hadlittlesocialutility. 8 In1873 and1878,Virginiaforbademarriagebetweenwhitesand,atfi rst,“Negroes ”andthen“coloreds”inlawsthattouchedoffdebatesoverracial designations.In1924thestateclarifiedracialcategories...