In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Rude & Barbarous Kingdom Revisited: Essays in Russian History and Culture in Honor of Robert O. Crummey. Chester S. L. Dunning, Russell E. Martin, and Daniel Rowland, eds. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers, 2008, 231–49.       Realization vs. Standard: Commemorative Meals in the Iosif Volotskii Monastery in 1566/67 Ludwig Steindorff Those   who   work   on   the   history   of   the   Iosif   Volotskii   monastery   75   miles   northwest   of   Moscow   know   the   Eparkhial’noe   sobranie   (the   Diocesan   Col-­‐‑ lection)  in  the  manuscript  depository  of  the  State  Historical  Museum  at  Mos-­‐‑ cow  as  one  of  the  most  important  collections  of  relevant  sources  since  it  forms   a  part  of  the  former  library  of  that  monastery,  which  was  founded  by  Iosif   Sanin  in  1479.1  Beside  readings  from  the  Bible,  liturgical  books,  and  patristic   literature,  we  find  a  number  of  memorial  registers  (sinodiki),  Donation  Books   (Vkladnye  knigi),  and  Books  of  Feasts  (Kormovye  knigi),  i.e.,  those  sources  which   refer  to  the  role  of  the  monastery  as  a  receiver  of  donations  and  center  of  litur-­‐‑ gical   commemoration.2   While   some   of   these   manuscripts   were   frequently   used  by  researchers,  one  of  them  has  hardly  been  taken  into  account  so  far.3   Manuscript  no.  417  (683)  is  described  as  “Rule  for  meals  and  the  commemo-­‐‑ ration  of  the  living  and  the  dead,  1565,  80  (15  cm  x  10  cm),  Russian  cursive   uncial.  38  folios.  The  ending  is  lost”  (“Ustav  o  trapeze  i  pominanii  zhivykh  i   umershikh,   1565   g.,   80   (15x10),   russkii   beglyi   ustav.   38   l.   Okonchanie   utra-­‐‑ cheno”).4  The  description  of  the  contents  is  limited  to  the  remark  that  feasts                                                                                                                             1  The  latest  monograph  on  the  history  of  the  monastery  is  by  Tom  E.  Dykstra,  Russian   Monastic  Culture:  “Josephism”  and  the  Iosifo-­‐‑Volokolamsk  Monastery  1947–1607  (Munich:   Otto  Sagner,  2006  [=Slavistische  Beiträge  450]).  A  table  of  all  known  monks  from  the   monastery  was  published  by  him:  “Inocheskie  imena  v  Moskovskoi  Rusi  i  problemy   identifikatsii  ikh  obladatelei  (na  materiale  istochnikov  Iosifo-­‐‑Volokolamskogo  monas-­‐‑ tyria,   1479–1607),”   in   Imenoslov:   Istoricheskaia   semantika   imeni.   Vypusk   2,   ed.   Fedor   Uspenskii  (Moscow:  Indrik,  2007),  238–98.   2  For   the   typology   of   the   whole   complex   of   sources,   see   Ludwig   Steindorff,   “Com-­‐‑ memoration  and  Administrative  Techniques  in  Muscovite  Monasteries,”  Russian  His-­‐‑ tory/Histoire  Russe  22:  4  (1995):  433–54;  L.  Shtaindorf  [Ludwig  Steindorff],  “Sravnenie   istochnikov  ob  organizatsii  pominaniia  usopshikh  v  Iosifo-­‐‑Volokolamskom  i  v  Troitse-­‐‑ Sergievom  monastyriakh  v  XVI  v.,”  Arkheograficheskii  ezhegodnik  za  1996  god  (Moscow:   Nauka,  1998),  65–78,  esp.  67–69.   3  Gosudarstvennyi   istoricheskii   muzei,   Eparkhial’noe   sobranie   [hereafter   GIM,   Eparkh.  sobr.],  no.  417  (683).     4  T.  V.  Dianova,  L.  M.  Kostiukhina,  and  I.  V.  Pozdeeva,  “Opisanie  rukopisei  biblioteki   Iosifo-­‐‑Volokolamskogo  monastyria,”  Knizhnye  tsentry  Drevnei  Rusi:  Iosifo-­‐‑Volokolamskii   232 LUDWIG STEINDORFF and  donations  are  enumerated  in  the  order  of  the  calendar,  beginning  from   September  1.  As  pointed  out  in  the  description,  all  persons  mentioned  in  the   entries  are  closely  linked  to  the  monastery,  and  the  entries  offer  information   about  the  food.   So  at  first  glance  it  looks  as  if  the  manuscript  was  an  early  variant  of  the   extant   Kormovaia   kniga   from   the   Iosif   Volotskii   monastery,   which   was   com-­‐‑ posed  in  about  1581,  and  which,  in  the  form  of  a  calendar,  indicates  the  dates   of  kormy  (festive  meals  in  memory  of  donors  or  their  relatives),  registers  the   donations  on  the  basis  of  which  the  kormy  were  established,  and  contains  in-­‐‑ structions   about   food   and   beverage.   The   annual   commemoration   by   a   korm   was  normally  bound  to  the  donation  of  at  least  100  rubles  or  corresponding   real  estate  or  movable  goods.5  But  a  more  detailed  analysis  of  the  manuscript   will  prove  that  it  is  a  unique  example  of  a  new  source  type,  previously  un-­‐‑ known,  which  supplies  new  information  about  the  memorial  practice  in  the   monastery.   The  book  starts  on  folio  2:6  “In  the  year  7075,  on  September  1,  on  the  Feast   of  St.  Semion,  which  fell  on  a  Sunday.  In  the  trapeze  [refectory],  the  following   food  was  served…”  (“Leta  7000  sem’desiatogo  piatogo  mesiatsa  sentiabria  v   1,   pamiat’   prepodobna   ottsa   Semiona,   prilochilos’7   v   nedeliu.   V   trapeze   estva…”).   A   description   of   the   food   served   for   lunch   follows:   bread,   pirogi,   shchi,  eggs,  but,  as  explicitly  noted,  no  kolachi.  The  brethren  drank  kvas  which   had  been  prepared  from  grain.  Even  from  this  short  quotation  it  is  obvious   that  the  organization  of  the  text  is  different  from  that  of  a  Book  of  Feasts  (Kor-­‐‑ movaia  kniga).  The  Book  of  Feasts  is  a  normative  text;  it  is  not  bound  to  a  cer-­‐‑ tain  year,  but  it  indicates  the  dates...

Share