In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

part฀ii.฀rhetoric฀of฀taste chapter฀ Poems฀for฀the฀Emperor:฀Imperial฀Tastes฀in฀the฀Early฀ Ninth฀Century pauline฀yu It฀is฀well฀known฀that฀the฀compilation฀of฀works฀by฀multiple฀authors฀in฀China฀ is฀ a฀ practice฀ as฀ old฀ as฀ the฀ textual฀ tradition฀ itself.฀ Most฀ of฀ the฀ Confucian฀ classics,฀ for฀ example,฀ are฀ essentially฀ anthologies—of฀ poetry,฀ of฀ historical,฀ expository,฀ and฀ rhetorical฀ prose,฀ and฀ of฀ writings฀ on฀ ritual.฀ This฀ impulse฀ to฀ select฀ and฀ preserve฀ literary฀ texts฀ was฀ extended,฀ time฀ and฀ time฀ again,฀ from฀such฀repositories฀of฀moral฀wisdom฀and฀historical฀exempla฀to฀other฀ enterprises฀of฀widely฀varying฀topic,฀scope,฀and฀significance. I฀ have฀ discussed฀ elsewhere฀ some฀ of฀ the฀ likely฀ motivations฀ behind฀ such฀ endeavors,฀ be฀ they฀ curatorial,฀ normative,฀ evaluative,฀ pedagogical,฀ programmatic,฀or฀haphazard,฀as฀well฀as฀some฀of฀the฀principles฀behind฀the฀ earliest฀ extant฀ examples฀ in฀ China.1 ฀ Various฀ analogies฀ to฀ collecting฀ have฀ suggested฀themselves฀along฀the฀way฀as฀well.฀David฀Antin’s฀comparison฀of฀a฀ poetic฀anthology฀to฀a฀zoo฀induced฀me฀to฀explore฀both฀the฀similarities฀and฀the฀ differences฀between฀these฀two฀cultural฀forms.2 ฀A฀Newsweek฀review฀of฀Martin฀ Scorsese’s฀New฀York฀Stories฀that฀defined฀this฀filmic฀triptych฀as฀an฀anthology฀ and,฀therefore,฀“the฀cinematic฀equivalent฀of฀grazing”฀then฀led฀me฀to฀consider฀ the฀ aptness฀ of฀ late฀ twentieth-century฀ yuppie฀ habits฀ of฀ consumption฀ as฀ a฀ more฀familiar฀image฀that฀etymology฀provides:฀the฀Greek฀root฀of฀the฀word฀ “anthology,”฀ anthologia,฀ as฀ well฀ as฀ its฀ Latin฀ counterpart,฀ florilegium,฀ both฀ of฀which฀refer฀to฀a฀“gathering฀of฀flowers.”4 ฀฀If฀the฀Greeks฀imagined฀these฀ as฀ blossoms฀ plucked฀ and฀ woven฀ into฀ a฀ garland,฀ in฀ the฀ Chinese฀ tradition฀ the฀blooms฀were฀more฀likely฀cultivated,฀and,฀especially฀in฀the฀case฀of฀larger฀ compilations,฀the฀gathering฀was฀more฀a฀“grove฀of฀letters”฀(wen฀lin฀文林)฀or฀ “literary฀garden”฀(wen฀yuan฀文苑).฀And,฀indeed,฀principles฀of฀selection฀and฀ arrangement฀could฀be฀as฀individual฀and฀variable฀as฀horticultural฀projects฀ would฀come฀to฀be. There฀ is฀ no฀ comparison฀ in฀ either฀ the฀ Greek฀ or฀ the฀ Latin฀ tradition,฀ however,฀ to฀ the฀ sheer฀ number฀ of฀ anthologies฀ produced฀ in฀ China,฀ which฀ proliferated฀markedly฀from฀the฀third฀century฀onward.฀The฀bibliographical฀ essay฀in฀the฀history฀of฀the฀Sui฀dynasty,฀for฀example,฀enumerates฀the฀titles฀ of฀฀anthologies,฀of฀which฀฀were฀extant฀by฀the฀time฀of฀its฀compilation฀ in฀ .5 ฀ ฀ The฀ Tang฀ dynasty฀ (–)฀ continued฀ this฀ tradition,฀ and฀ the฀ early฀years฀in฀particular฀witnessed฀the฀production฀of฀large฀compendia฀and฀ encyclopedias฀ that฀ among฀ other฀ functions,฀ provided฀ important฀ models฀ for฀ use฀ in฀ official฀ composition.6 ฀ Given฀ the฀ extraordinary฀ burgeoning฀ of฀ poetic฀production฀during฀the฀Tang,฀it฀should฀come฀as฀no฀surprise฀to฀find฀ a฀ significant฀ number฀ of฀ collections฀ throughout฀ the฀ dynasty฀ focusing฀ on฀ poetry฀ alone.฀ Approximately฀ sixty฀ titles฀ of฀ such฀ anthologies,฀ many฀ from฀ the฀same฀hand,฀are฀listed฀in฀the฀two฀Tang฀histories,฀of฀which฀nine฀were฀still฀ in฀ circulation฀ when฀ the฀ Qing฀ scholar฀ Wang฀ Shizhen฀ 王士禎฀ (–)฀ published฀his฀Ten฀Anthologies฀of฀Tang฀Poems฀(Shi฀zhong฀Tang฀shi฀xuan฀十種 唐詩選 ).7 ฀฀ The฀ titles฀ of฀ the฀ original฀ group฀ suggest฀ that฀ a฀ number฀ of฀ different฀ principles฀governed฀the฀selection฀and฀organization฀of฀these฀contemporary฀ collections.฀ While฀ some฀ editors฀ collected฀ works฀ from฀ the฀ entire฀ dynasty,฀ others฀focused฀on฀a฀more฀narrow฀chronological฀scope.฀Their฀volumes฀have฀ thus฀been฀identified,฀thanks฀to฀later฀periodization฀schemes,฀as฀anthologies฀ primarily฀of฀Early฀(–),8 ฀High฀(–),9 ฀Middle฀(–),10 ฀or฀Late฀ (–)11 ฀Tang฀poetry.฀Some฀anthologists฀included฀poetry฀from฀a฀single฀ geographical฀area฀or฀a฀particular฀social฀group,฀such฀as฀court฀officials,฀Taoists,฀ and฀women.฀Some฀restricted฀themselves฀to฀only฀one฀poetic฀sub-genre,฀be฀ [3.129.195.206] Project MUSE (2024-04-26 11:08 GMT) prosodic฀form,฀such฀as฀regulated฀verse฀or฀quatrains. Principles฀ of฀ organization฀ and฀ annotation฀ were฀ similarly฀ various.฀ Most,฀but฀not฀all,฀volumes฀group฀poems฀by฀author;฀however,฀those฀in฀turn฀ appear฀ sometimes฀ according฀ to฀ official฀ status,13 ฀ or฀ more฀ commonly,฀ in฀ chronological฀ order—although฀ often฀ approximate—by฀ age.฀ Drawing฀ on฀ the฀model฀of฀Zhong฀Rong’s฀鍾嶸฀(–)฀Gradings฀of฀Poetry฀(Shi฀pin฀詩 品),฀two฀of฀the฀best-known฀anthologists,฀Yin฀Fan฀殷璠฀and฀Gao฀Zhongwu฀ 高仲武,฀provide฀critically฀appreciative฀or฀evaluative฀comments฀to฀poems.฀ Biographical฀information฀appears฀for฀the฀first฀time฀in฀Yao฀He’s฀姚合฀ninthcentury ฀ collection฀ as฀ well.฀ As฀ Wu฀ Qiming฀ 吳企明฀ has฀ pointed฀ out,฀ the฀ continually฀increasing฀numbers฀of฀poems฀and฀poets฀throughout฀the฀dynasty฀ provided฀both฀the฀opportunity฀and฀the฀need฀to฀achieve฀some฀control฀over฀ and฀create฀a฀framework฀within฀which฀to฀grasp,฀and฀to฀preserve,฀an฀all฀too฀ fleeting฀multiplicity฀of฀forms.14 ฀ ฀฀฀฀฀Wu฀also฀notes฀that฀the฀Wen฀xuan฀文選 (Selections฀of฀refined฀literature),฀ compiled฀during฀the฀reign฀of฀Crown฀Prince฀Xiao฀Tong฀蕭統฀(–)฀of...

Share