In this Book

summary
Mythodologies challenges the implied methodology in contemporary studies in the humanities. We claim, at times, that we gather facts or what we will call evidence, and from that form hypotheses and conclusions. Of course, we recognize that the sum total of evidence for any argument is beyond comprehension; therefore, we construct, and we claim, preliminary hypotheses, perhaps to organize the chaos of evidence, or perhaps simply to find it; we might then see (we claim) whether that evidence challenges our tentative hypotheses. Ideally, we could work this way. Yet the history of scholarship and our own practices suggest we do nothing of the kind. Rather, we work the way we teach our composition students to write: choose or construct a thesis, then invent the evidence to support it. This book has three parts, examining such methods and pseudo-methods of invention in medieval studies, bibliography, and editing. Part One, “Noster Chaucer,” looks at examples in Chaucer studies, such as the notion that Chaucer wrote iambic pentameter, and the definition of a canon in Chaucer. “Our” Chaucer has, it seems, little to do with Chaucer himself, and in constructing this entity, Chaucerians are engaged largely in self-validation of their own tradition. Part Two, “Bibliography and Book History,” consists of three studies in the field of bibliography: the recent rise in studies of annotations; the implications of presumably neutral terminology in editing, a case-study in cataloguing. Part Three, “Cacophonies: A Bibliographical Rondo,” is a series of brief studies extending these critiques to other areas in the humanities. It seems not to matter what we talk about: meter, book history, the sex life of bonobos. In all of these discussions, we see the persistence of error, the intractability of uncritical assumptions, and the dominance of authority over evidence.

Table of Contents

  1. Cover
  2. open access Download |
  1. Title, Copyright
  2. pp. i-viii
  3. open access Download |
  1. Contents
  2. pp. ix-x
  3. open access Download |
  1. Acknowledgments
  2. pp. xi-xii
  3. open access Download |
  1. List of Figures
  2. pp. xiii-xiv
  3. open access Download |
  1. Introduction: An Exercise in Bad Faith
  2. pp. 15-26
  3. open access Download |
  1. Part 1 · Noster Chaucerus
  1. 1 How Many Chaucerians Does It Take to Count to Eleven? The Meter of Kynaston’s 1635 Translation of Troilus and Criseyde
  2. pp. 29-52
  3. open access Download |
  1. 2 Chaucer’s “Rude Times”
  2. pp. 53-78
  3. open access Download |
  1. 3 Meditation on Our Chaucer and the History of the Canon
  2. pp. 79-104
  3. open access Download |
  1. Coda Godwin’s Portrait of Chaucer
  2. pp. 105-110
  3. open access Download |
  1. Part 2 · Bibliography and Book History
  1. 4 The Singularities of Books and Reading
  2. pp. 113-134
  3. open access Download |
  1. 5 Editorial Projecting
  2. pp. 135-164
  3. open access Download |
  1. 6 The Haunting of Suckling’s Fragmenta Aurea (1646)
  2. pp. 165-190
  3. open access Download |
  1. 7 T.F. Dibdin: The Rhetoric of Bibliophilia
  2. pp. 191-198
  3. open access Download |
  1. Part 3 · Cacophonies: A Bibliographical Rondo
  1. 1 Fakes and Frauds
  2. pp. 201-214
  3. open access Download |
  1. 2 Modernity and Middle English
  2. pp. 215-222
  3. open access Download |
  1. 3 The Quantification of Readability
  2. pp. 223-230
  3. open access Download |
  1. 4 The Elephant Paper and the Histories of Medieval Drama
  2. pp. 231-242
  3. open access Download |
  1. 5 The Pynson Chaucer(s) of 1526
  2. pp. 243-256
  3. open access Download |
  1. 6 Margaret Mead and the Bonobos
  2. pp. 257-266
  3. open access Download |
  1. 7 Reading My Library
  2. pp. 267-270
  3. open access Download |
  1. Bibliography
  2. pp. 271-293
  3. open access Download |

Additional Information

ISBN
9781947447561
MARC Record
OCLC
1076791151
Pages
292
Launched on MUSE
2019-08-04
Open Access
Yes
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.