Abstract

Abstract:

These brief comments constitute a long-delayed response to Christopher Hook-way's 1991 review essay (Semiotica, 1991) devoted to my book on Peirce's Philosophy of Religion (Indiana, 1989). Against the background of considerable agreement, Hookway and I disagree about precisely how to read Peirce's Neglected Argument, about exactly what Peirce is proposing to his readers in that article. I regard Peirce's recommendation of musement as supplying both the rubrics for a certain kind of experiment and as the desciption of a certain type of exercise in reading and rereading.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1558-9587
Print ISSN
0009-1774
Pages
pp. 485-495
Launched on MUSE
2019-03-28
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.