In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • A Taste for the Beautiful: the Evolution of Attraction by Michael J. Ryan
  • Jan Baetens.
A TASTE FOR THE BEAUTIFUL: THE EVOLUTION OF ATTRACTION
by Michael J. Ryan. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2018. 208 pp., illus. Trade. ISBN: 978-0691167268.

A Taste for the Beautiful gives an excellent overview of cutting-edge research in the field of sexual selection, Darwin’s second great evolutionary theory after that of natural selection. This field is an important correction of Darwin’s initial views, which were not immediately capable of answering questions on the existence and elaboration of features that proved both highly attractive from a sexual point of view, that is in view of reproduction, and ruthlessly harmful in terms of survival (the classic example being the peacock’s tail). New research in the discipline is no longer satisfied with solving the apparent paradox of this coexistence of incompatible characteristics or explaining the underlying mechanisms of sexual attractiveness, which are now situated in the brain, the most important of our sexual organs, since beauty and attractiveness—the necessary conditions for successful mating and reproduction—are not “essential” or “inherent” properties of creatures but properties acknowledged by specific and species-related brain functions and constituents. Although all mysteries concerning beauty recognition are far from being deciphered, contemporary research has witnessed a dramatic shift. Instead of only trying to see how sexual brains evolve in order to become capable of noticing which kind of beauty properties offers the best possible guarantee for numerous and healthy offspring, recent investigations are also interested in studying how features recognized as beautiful evolve in order to better match the recognizing properties of the brain itself.

Ryan phrases it this way:

I have a unique perspective to offer on these issues as I have spent the past forty years studying the sexual behavior of a tiny, bumpy frog in Central America. This work has opened my eyes and mind to both the diversity of sexual behavior in the animal kingdom and a core unifying theory that I have developed called sensory exploitation. The key idea is simple: features of the female’s brain that find certain notes of the males’ mating call attractive existed long before those attractive notes evolved. Thus, females are the biological puppeteers, making the males sing exactly what their brains desire. Beauty is indeed in the brain of the beholder, and in most cases, that means the female’s brain. . . . This simple idea contributed to a paradigm shift in the study of sexual selection, one in which the importance of the sexual brain as a driver of evolution finally was acknowledged

(pp. 3–4).

Ryan’s book gives a lively and very readable survey of this—his and others’—ongoing research. Yet readability and liveliness are not the only qualities of this work. First of all, Ryan is a very meticulous scientist, who tries to divide each question into as many subquestions as possible or necessary. For instance, when discussing sexual attractiveness—for this is how beauty must be encoded in the larger context of reproduction and survival—he makes sharp distinctions between: liking sex, wanting sex, making love and actual reproduction, linking each type of sexual behavior with specific, sometimes contradictory types of beauty.

Second, Ryan is also a very nuanced and cautious researcher. The perspective he adopts is always multiple, and he is at great pains taking into account the conflicting outcomes of different types of beauty. To give just one example: In certain species, certain beauty features may attract the eye, ear or nose of the mate(s), but they may for exactly the same reasons also attract possible predators—and even sexually very successful [End Page 96] creatures that become food for their enemies do not survive.

Third, Ryan is not a determinist thinker at all. Not only does he accept the limits of the general rules he establishes, always highlighting the existence of exceptions and inconsistencies that he never reduces to just exceptions or mere chance deviations. He is also very keen in admitting blank spaces and following a trial-and-error method. The frequent “sacrifice” of creatures whose brains are sliced up in order to measure...

pdf

Share