Abstract

Abstract:

The Greek text of the United Bible Societies (UBS) is characterised by a preference for shorter readings. Consequently, the UBS text omits verses and words that have been included in the Greek Textus Receptus, as well as the Latin Vulgate. From a comparison between the received text, the Clementine Vulgate, UBS5 and the Nova Vulgata, this article identifies the main quantitative differences in the textual traditions of the New Testament. This comparison dispels claims that the UBS text favours readings of the Clementine Vulgate and indicates that the UBS text, followed by the Nova Vulgata, is in fact a departure from the Clementine Vulgate as far as its omissions are concerned. On the other hand, differences between the Vulgate and the Textus Receptus on the "missing" verses are shown to be trivial in comparison with the UBS text and Nova Vulgata.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
2518-4628
Print ISSN
0254-8356
Pages
pp. 433-470
Launched on MUSE
2019-01-29
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.