In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

French Historical Studies 26.3 (2003) 539-559



[Access article in PDF]

Une France locale:
The Local Past in Recent French Scholarship

Stéphane Gerson


Une histoire á soi: Figurations du passé et localités, ed. Alban Bensa and Daniel Fabre (Paris, 2001)
Le bicentenaire de la Révolution française: Pratiques sociales d'une commémoration, by Patrick Garcia (Paris, 2000)
Ils apprenaient la France: L'exaltation des régions dans le discours patriotique, by Anne-Marie Thiesse (Paris, 1997)
L'école républicaine et les petites patries, by Jean-François Chanet (Paris, 1996) "Les petites patries dans la France républicaine," special issue of Jean Jaurès cahiers trimestriels 152 (April–June 1999)
History as a Profession: The Study of History in France, 1818–1914, by Pim den Boer, trans. Arnold J. Pomerans (Princeton, N.J., 1998)
Les représentations du Moyen âge au XIXe siècle dans les anciens Pays-Bas français et leurs confins picards. Essai d'historiographie comparée, by Odile Parsis-Barubé, 2 vols. (Villeneuve d'Ascq, 1999)
Naissance de la Normandie: Genèse et épanouissement d'une image régionale en France, 1750–1850, by François Guillet (Caen, 2000)

Local France: these words long evoked a story of neglect, coercion, nostalgia, and reaction. The neglect and coercion were those of a state that, since the Bourbons, stifled expressions of local autonomy and individuality. This is, of course, Tocqueville's argument: "independent life" fell victim to a cultural and political centralization that transcended the divide of 1789. "The movement of thought originated in the center alone" and the central state became "the unique and necessary agent of [End Page 539] public life." 1 Under the French Revolution, the republican state began castigating local idioms, a particularism that the united nation could ill tolerate. 2 The regimes that followed throughout the nineteenth century differed in many respects, but not this one. All constrained local political action, associations, and "partial cultures." 3 Associations fared better under the Third Republic, but local culture did not. "The Bureau de l'Enseignement public," Maurice Barrès wrote in 1897, "has disgusted [schoolchildren] with their petite patrie," their local natural and historical milieu. 4 The local—i.e., identification with an infranational territory—had thus fallen victim to a hostile state as well as expanding markets, growing literacy, conscription, and improved communications. It survived as nostalgia and myth: the small-town industry and social harmony that, for Maurice Genevoix and others, underlay "French civilization." 5 And it survived on the Right and Far Right as a gateway toward immemorial traditions, hierarchy, and homogeneous community. Barrès's petite patrie linked the reactionary provincialism of aristocrats, legitimists, and clergymen to Vichy's rural organicism. 6 Moribund or retrograde, the local hence contributed little—be it as horizon or sphere of action—to the formation of modern France. The nation alone innovated: it alone, accordingly, carried historical significance.

This narrative underwent a partial modification in the 1960s and 1970s, when anticapitalist and antistatist currents converged on the local as antidote to an all-controlling, uniform, technocratic society. To distant national institutions and the French state's deceiving embrace of decentralization, these currents opposed local "self-administration": initiative and responsibility over singular and resourceful territories. The local and the pays (sometimes conflated with the region) became the physical location of a "new life" and civic action. They also embodied [End Page 540] a flexible "place of residence and activity," whose modes of association and social action became appealing in a period of recession and limited geographic mobility. 7 Some scholars likewise turned to the local as an analytical category capable of illuminating the diverse social and political configurations of modern France. 8 Yet antistatist currents also endorsed the vision of the local as victim of a Jacobin state. And many in France still dismissed the local as folklore or militant delusion. The nation continued to dominate. 9

This is less markedly the case. Over the past twenty years, public and private figures have begun extolling the local as the embodiment of civil society, a...

pdf

Share