In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

THE STRUCTURE AND MEANING OF CATCH-22 Robert Merrill* The critical reputation of Joseph Heller's Catch-22 (1961) is a curiosity. The book is often praised, even celebrated, yet most critics are still puzzled by such basic matters as the structure of the novel. Friends and foes alike tend to agree that the novel is hilarious but also that it is repetitious and essentially formless. Norman Mailer speaks for all those who share this view when he says "like yard goods, one could cut it anywhere. One could take a hundred pages from the middle of Catch22 and not even the author could be certain they were gone."1 As it happens, the author is rather certain that he would notice. Heller has said that Catch-22 "is not to my mind a formless novel. If anything, it was constructed almost meticulously, and with a meticulous concern to give the appearance of a formless novel."2 Heller's remarks may seem defensive or at least exaggerated, but a close examination of Catch-22 confirms that the book is as meticulously structured as Heller claims. Indeed, the book's more puzzling features—its bewildering chronology, its repetitiveness, its protagonist's belated change of heart—all fit together to advance Heller's radical protest against the modern social order. What appears to be formless chaos is in fact a brilliant strategy to expose not only the worst excesses of the modern bureaucracy but also the complacent acceptance of this system on the part of everyone involved, including Heller's readers. The structural complexity of Catch22 thus embodies Heller's meaning more thoroughly than even his admirers have been willing to suggest.3 Reconsideration of the structure of Catch-22 might well begin with the most "obvious" example of Heller's formlessness: the utterly confusing chronology. Heller presents his story in such a way that at certain points it is literally impossible to determine the order of events. By the time Yossarian enters the hospital in chapter 1, all of the important missions have already been flown: Ferrara, Orvieto, Bologna, and Avignon . This means that Yossarian has already flown over the bridge at Ferrara twice; that MiIo Minderbinder has already established M & M Enterprises; that Snowden has already died over Avignon and subsequently been buried; that Yossarian has already stood naked in formation to receive a medal for his "heroism" at Ferrara. As most of the *Robert Merrill is a Professor of English at the University of Nevada, Reno. He has published a book on Norman Mailer and articles on American fiction in American Literature , Modern Language Quarterly, Modern Philology, Texas Studies in Literature and Language, Modern Fiction Studies, and elsewhere. He is currently completing a book on Joseph Heller. 140Robert Merrill crucial events have already occurred by the time the novel opens, Heller resorts to a series of flashbacks in order to introduce these materials. In itself this is not a "difficult" technique, but as practiced here it makes it very difficult to establish something so basic as the chronology of events. There are several reasons for this, each of which points to what is distinctive about the structure. First, there is the peculiar nature of Heller's flashbacks. Indeed, to use the term "flashback" is a bit misleading, for the word usually implies an episode rendered dramatically and at some length. In Catch-22 there are a number of such episodes, but Heller presents much of the relevant material in oblique references, radically truncated scenes, and passing remarks in the dialogue. The death of Snowden is rendered in all of these ways, first as the subject of casual comments (where it is not even clear that Snowden has died), then as the occasion for brief, inconclusive "scenes," finally as the novel's most powerfully dramatized episode (chapter 41). The early references are naturally confusing because they allude to a scene not yet fully rendered; such references hardly help establish the chronological relationships among the several episodes. Second, the sheer number of the flashbacks frustrates any effort to piece together the chronological puzzle. If the passing references are counted, there must be hundreds of flashbacks in Catch-22. The novel might well...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 139-152
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.