Abstract

This essay undertakes a detailed frame analysis of print media coverage of the Matthew Shepard murder in three nationally influential newspapers as well as Time magazine and The Advocate. We contend that the media's tragic framing of the event, with an emphasis on the scapegoat process, functioned rhetorically to alleviate the public's guilt concerning anti-gay hate crimes and to excuse the public of any social culpability. It also functioned ideologically to reaffirm a dominant set of discourses that socially stigmatizes gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered persons and to hamper efforts to create and enact a social policy that would prevent this type of violence in the future. A concluding section considers Burke's notion of the "comic frame" as a potential corrective for the media's coverage of public tragedies.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1534-5238
Print ISSN
1094-8392
Pages
pp. 483-505
Launched on MUSE
2002-09-01
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.