We are unable to display your institutional affiliation without JavaScript turned on.
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE
OR

Find using OpenURL

Rent from DeepDyve Rent from DeepDyve

Status and Challenges of Grassland Restoration in the United States
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Grasslands are dynamic and diverse. They thrive in almost any soil, from former agricultural fields to wetlands, pipeline routes, vacant lots, and brownfields. Despite prolific research and discussion in the academic, public, and private spheres, there is still much we don’t know about how to restore an ecologically functioning grassland ecosystem that supports many plant, animal and microbe species, decreases soil erosion, increases water quality, resists invasive plant species, and is pleasing to the eye.

In this special issue of Ecological Restoration, we have compiled a series of perspectives, reviews, research, and design articles to address the status, challenges, and success of grassland restoration in the United States. We start this issue with a series of perspectives from individuals in academic, private, and public organizations involved in grassland restoration. These authors cover topics spanning invasion resistance (Yurkonis), coupling habitat restoration with biofuel production (Burkhalter), native seed production (Kedzierski, Miller), and the importance of communication between scientists and practitioners to enhance restoration success (Dickens and Suding). This is followed by a series of restoration notes and articles that experimentally test the practice and theory of restoration ecology. Rayburn and Laca review the practice of strip-seeding in grassland restoration. Goldblum and colleagues, and Nemec and colleagues, examine the impact of different seed mixes and density on target species composition and invasion resistance in restored grasslands. Norland and colleagues show that the seeding of functionally similar forbs is successful in resisting invasion of Canada thistle. Agricultural catchments can be successfully restored to diverse plant communities without increasing unwanted species in crops (Hirsh et al.). Espeland examines the importance of soil legacy and soil conditioning in restoring California plantain populations. Taylor and colleagues demonstrate that low-cost grazing, herbicide, and seeding treatments increase native perennial grasses over exotic grasses. Finally, we feature an extensive design project by Nelson Byrd Woltz Landscape Architects that incorporates restoration and monitoring into the transformation of a former agricultural landscape.


Click for larger view

USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database / Hitchcock, A.S. (rev. A. Chase). 1950. Manual of the grasses of the United States. Washington, DC.: USDA Miscellaneous Publication No. 200.

All of these pieces further the science and practice of restoration ecology to enhance the diversity and ecological function of our much damaged grasslands. Ecological Restoration hopes that by communicating these findings to you, this special issue will help bridge the gap between science and practice, advancing your efforts. Thank you for reading.

Copyright © 2013 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
Project MUSE® - View Citation
Myla F.J. Aronson. "Status and Challenges of Grassland Restoration in the United States." Ecological Restoration 31.2 (2013): 119-119. Project MUSE. Web. 21 Jun. 2013. <http://muse.jhu.edu/>.
Aronson, M. F.(2013). Status and Challenges of Grassland Restoration in the United States. Ecological Restoration 31(2), 119. University of Wisconsin Press. Retrieved June 21, 2013, from Project MUSE database.
Myla F.J. Aronson. "Status and Challenges of Grassland Restoration in the United States." Ecological Restoration 31, no. 2 (2013): 119-119. http://muse.jhu.edu/ (accessed June 21, 2013).
TY - JOUR
T1 - Status and Challenges of Grassland Restoration in the United States
A1 - Myla F.J. Aronson
JF - Ecological Restoration
VL - 31
IS - 2
SP - 119
EP - 119
PY - 2013
PB - University of Wisconsin Press
SN - 1543-4079
UR - http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ecological_restoration/v031/31.2.aronson.html
N1 - Volume 31, Number 2, June 2013
ER -

...


You must be logged in through an institution that subscribes to this journal or book to access the full text.

Shibboleth

Shibboleth authentication is only available to registered institutions.

Project MUSE

For subscribing associations only.