Emily Dickinson and Class

B Erkkila - American Literary History, 1992 - academic.oup.com
B Erkkila
American Literary History, 1992academic.oup.com
Nowhere is the controversy over the relative merits and limits and possible interdependence
of class and gender as categories of historical and cultural analysis more evident than in
recent work on Emily Dickinson. 1 From Rebecca Patterson's early emphasis on Dickinson's
erotic relationships with women in The Riddle of Emily Dickinson (1951), to Adrienne Rich's
important essay" Vesuvius at Home: The Power of Emily Dickinson"(1975), to more recent
work by Sandra Gilbert, Joanne Feit Diehl, Barbara Mossberg, Vivian Pollak, and Wendy …
Nowhere is the controversy over the relative merits and limits and possible interdependence of class and gender as categories of historical and cultural analysis more evident than in recent work on Emily Dickinson. 1 From Rebecca Patterson's early emphasis on Dickinson's erotic relationships with women in The Riddle of Emily Dickinson (1951), to Adrienne Rich's important essay" Vesuvius at Home: The Power of Emily Dickinson"(1975), to more recent work by Sandra Gilbert, Joanne Feit Diehl, Barbara Mossberg, Vivian Pollak, and Wendy Martin, among others, feminist critics have overturned traditional representations of Dickinson as sentimental recluse," Belle of Amherst,''unrequited lover, or sublimated neurotic. But through an almost exclusive focus on gender, psychosexuality, and patriarchy as the only oppression, feminist critics have also tended paradoxically to take Dickinson out of history,(re) privatizing her in the space of the home and the psyche, and subsuming the particularity and difference of Dickinson's life and work into a repeat across time of the same familial romance: the story of the daughter's revolt against a perpetually demonized and transhistorical patriarch and her desire to return to a preoedipal and prehistorical mother. 2
In this essay, I would like to problematize the historical grounds of these polarizations by (re) situating Dickinson as fully and complexly as possible in relation to the social, political, and cultural struggles of her times. While it is certainly true to say that Dickinson was not an overtly political poet in the same sense that Whitman was, it is simply not true to say that she had no politics and no ideological investment in a particular order of power. Dickinson was, in fact, born into a more publicly active and politically engaged family than Whitman: her grandfather, Samuel Fowler Dickinson, helped to found Amherst Academy (1814) and later Amherst College (1821); her father, Edward Dickinson, and her brother, Austin, were actively involved in public projects and in the institutional ordering and administration of church, college, and town over many years. As William Tyler writes in his History of Amherst College (1873), Edward Dickinson" has been so long and so fully identified with
Oxford University Press