Typologies of democratic systems

A Lijphart - Comparative political studies, 1968 - journals.sagepub.com
A Lijphart
Comparative political studies, 1968journals.sagepub.com
-POLITICAL THEORISTS AND SCIENTISTS, from Plato and J. Aristotle on, have attempted
to construct classifioatory schemes of political systems to aid them in their colorations of
politics, and such schemes have become particularly prevalent in comparative politics in
recent years., However, recent typologists have not followed the prece-dent spt&dquo; b §
their illustrious forebears in paying special attention to democracies. Aristotle distinguished
five different kinds of democracies; but in the modem typologies, democracies usually either …
-POLITICAL THEORISTS AND SCIENTISTS, from Plato and J. Aristotle on, have attempted to construct classifioatory schemes of political systems to aid them in their colorations of politics, and such schemes have become particularly prevalent in comparative politics in recent years., However, recent typologists have not followed the prece-dent spt&dquo; b § their illustrious forebears in paying special attention to democracies. Aristotle distinguished five different kinds of democracies; but in the modem typologies, democracies usually either constitute one category, without any further elaboration within the single category, or are subsumed under a more comprehensive category.
In the two well-known typologies based on Talcott Parsons’ pattern variables, a dichotomous distinction is made, in Francis X. Sutton s terms, between intet1five agricultural and modern industrial s~ ielies, or, to use Fred W. Riggs’ terms, between agrarian and j1JdU8t1’ian socieUes.’Mod-
Sage Journals