Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

S Mastenbroek, M Twisk… - Human reproduction …, 2011 - academic.oup.com
S Mastenbroek, M Twisk, F Van der Veen, S Repping
Human reproduction update, 2011academic.oup.com
BACKGROUND Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) has increasingly been used in the
past decade. Here we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs on the effect
of PGS on the probability of live birth after IVF. METHODS PubMed and trial registers were
searched for RCTs on PGS. Trials were assessed following predetermined quality criteria.
The primary outcome was live birth rate per woman, secondary outcomes were ongoing
pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate and pregnancy outcome …
BACKGROUND
Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) has increasingly been used in the past decade. Here we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs on the effect of PGS on the probability of live birth after IVF.
METHODS
PubMed and trial registers were searched for RCTs on PGS. Trials were assessed following predetermined quality criteria. The primary outcome was live birth rate per woman, secondary outcomes were ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate and pregnancy outcome.
RESULTS
Nine RCTs comparing IVF with and without PGS were included in our meta-analysis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was used in all trials and cleavage stage biopsy was used in all but one trial. PGS significantly lowered live birth rate after IVF for women of advanced maternal age (risk difference: −0.08; 95% confidence interval: −0. 13 to −0.03). For a live birth rate of 26% after IVF without PGS, the rate would be between 13 and 23% using PGS. Trials where PGS was offered to women with a good prognosis and to women with repeated implantation failure suggested similar outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
There is no evidence of a beneficial effect of PGS as currently applied on the live birth rate after IVF. On the contrary, for women of advanced maternal age PGS significantly lowers the live birth rate. Technical drawbacks and chromosomal mosaicism underlie this inefficacy of PGS. New approaches in the application of PGS should be evaluated carefully before their introduction into clinical practice.
Oxford University Press