The porosity of autonomy: Social and biological constitution of the patient in biomedicine

J Beever, N Morar - The American Journal of Bioethics, 2016 - Taylor & Francis
The American Journal of Bioethics, 2016Taylor & Francis
The nature and role of the patient in biomedicine comprise issues central to bioethical
inquiry. Given its developmental history grounded firmly in a backlash against 20th-century
cases of egregious human subjects abuse, contemporary medical bioethics has come to rely
on a fundamental assumption: the unit of care (and the unit of value) is the autonomous self-
directing patient. In this article we examine first the structure of the feminist social critique of
autonomy. Then we show that a parallel argument can be made against relational autonomy …
The nature and role of the patient in biomedicine comprise issues central to bioethical inquiry. Given its developmental history grounded firmly in a backlash against 20th-century cases of egregious human subjects abuse, contemporary medical bioethics has come to rely on a fundamental assumption: the unit of care (and the unit of value) is the autonomous self-directing patient. In this article we examine first the structure of the feminist social critique of autonomy. Then we show that a parallel argument can be made against relational autonomy as well, demonstrating how this second concept of autonomy fails to take sufficiently into account an array of biological determinants, particularly those from microbial biology. Finally, in light of this biological critique, we question whether or to what extent any relevant and meaningful view of autonomy can be recovered in the contemporary landscape of bioethics.
Taylor & Francis Online