Power, status, and abuse at work: General and sexual harassment compared

SH Lopez, R Hodson, VJ Roscigno - The Sociological Quarterly, 2009 - Taylor & Francis
The Sociological Quarterly, 2009Taylor & Francis
Workplace harassment can be devastating for employees and damaging for organizations.
In this article, we expand the literature by identifying common and distinct processes related
to general workplace harassment and workplace sexual harassment. Using both structural
equation modeling and in-depth case immersion, we analyze content-coded data from the
full population of workplace ethnographies—ethnographies that provide in-depth
information on the nature and causes of both general and sexual harassment that would …
Workplace harassment can be devastating for employees and damaging for organizations. In this article, we expand the literature by identifying common and distinct processes related to general workplace harassment and workplace sexual harassment. Using both structural equation modeling and in-depth case immersion, we analyze content-coded data from the full population of workplace ethnographies—ethnographies that provide in-depth information on the nature and causes of both general and sexual harassment that would otherwise be difficult to gather. Importantly, both forms of harassment emerge in settings characterized by physically demanding work and minority work groups. In such contexts, both general and sexual harassment enforce formal and informal status hierarchies and social exclusion. Grievance mechanisms and “team models” of workplace organization reduce sexual harassment but have no effect on general harassment. We conclude with a discussion of theoretical, legal, and policy implications for identifying and remedying harassment as a widespread and devastating form of inequality and social exclusion in organizations.
Taylor & Francis Online