Assessing undergraduate satisfaction with an academic department: A method and case study

DP Corts, JW Lounsbury, RA Saudargas… - College Student …, 2000 - go.gale.com
DP Corts, JW Lounsbury, RA Saudargas, HE Tatum
College Student Journal, 2000go.gale.com
This article describes assessment needs faced by academic departments from a variety of
disciplines. Included is a survey technique for assessing student satisfaction with overall
departmental performance in the following domains: advising, course offerings, career
preparation, instruction, and class sizes. While many departments limit evaluation to
individual teacher ratings, results of a case study indicate that each of the above factors is
positively correlated with overall satisfaction. Moreover, two areas beyond the scope of …
This article describes assessment needs faced by academic departments from a variety of disciplines. Included is a survey technique for assessing student satisfaction with overall departmental performance in the following domains: advising, course offerings, career preparation, instruction, and class sizes. While many departments limit evaluation to individual teacher ratings, results of a case study indicate that each of the above factors is positively correlated with overall satisfaction. Moreover, two areas beyond the scope of standard teaching evaluations, advising and career preparation, account for the most variance in overall student satisfaction in the case study. The method described in this article provides an efficient, comprehensive and flexible technique for departments that wish to assess student satisfaction.
Program evaluation has been a topic of extensive discussion and research in recent years (eg, Korn, Sweetman, & Nodine, 1996; Morgan & Johnson, 1997). Faculty and administrators interested in improving the overall quality of their departments have turned to methods ranging from alumni surveys (eg, Kressel, 1990) to senior seminars (Morgan & Johnson, 1997) to gather information regarding a variety of student outcomes, such as correlates of job and degree satisfaction. At the same time, other researchers have studied campuswide satisfaction of undergraduate students (Benjamin & Hollings, 1997). Recent research has established the importance of student satisfaction; not only does it improve retention (Koseke & Koseke, 1991) but also contributes to academic, personal, and professional achievement (Bean & Bradley, 1986; Pike, 1993). Kom et al. noted that faculty and professional consultants alike consider student satisfaction one of the primary problems facing academic departments. According to this report, student satisfaction is inversely related to student complaints regarding advising, career preparation, and the need for new courses or effectiveness of current courses. To address these student satisfaction issues in our department, we designed an Undergraduate Major Survey to assess students' satisfaction with the major as a whole and with the factors that may contribute to it.
Gale