Vision, touch, and the value of pictures

DMMI Lopes - The British Journal of Aesthetics, 2002 - academic.oup.com
The British Journal of Aesthetics, 2002academic.oup.com
Since blind people can draw and interpret raised‐line drawings, depiction is not an
essentially visual medium. Neither is the art of pictures an essentially visual art form. The
reasons given for evaluating a picture aesthetically may advert to its tactile qualities
insteadof its visual qualities. In particular, a raised‐line picture canbe valued for the tactile
experience it elicits of the scene it depicts, just as a visual picture is sometimes valuedfor
eliciting a visual experience of its subject. The argument for this claim responds to some …
Abstract
Since blind people can draw and interpret raised‐line drawings, depiction is not an essentially visual medium. Neither is the art of pictures an essentially visual art form. The reasons given for evaluating a picture aesthetically may advert to its tactile qualities insteadof its visual qualities.In particular, a raised‐line picture canbe valued for the tactile experience it elicits of the scene it depicts, just as a visual picture is sometimes valuedfor eliciting a visual experience of its subject. The argument for this claim responds to some objections recently put forward by Robert Hopkins.
Oxford University Press