An investigation of the self-efficacy of male and female academics

LG Schoen, S Winocur - Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1988 - Elsevier
LG Schoen, S Winocur
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1988Elsevier
Self-efficacy theory provides possible explanations as to why female academics are
concentrated in the lower ranks of academia. It was hypothesized that female academics
would have weaker self-efficacy beliefs in relation to research and administrative tasks. The
Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (AS-ES) was developed to assess strength of self-efficacy and
frequency of performing academic tasks. A national sample of Australian academics was
surveyed, and 337 questionnaires were returned. Factor analysis of the AS-ES generated …
Abstract
Self-efficacy theory provides possible explanations as to why female academics are concentrated in the lower ranks of academia. It was hypothesized that female academics would have weaker self-efficacy beliefs in relation to research and administrative tasks. The Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (AS-ES) was developed to assess strength of self-efficacy and frequency of performing academic tasks. A national sample of Australian academics was surveyed, and 337 questionnaires were returned. Factor analysis of the AS-ES generated four factors: Research, Teaching, Administration, and Miscellaneous Academic Tasks. Significant differences in self-efficacy and task frequency due to rank and sex on each factor and across factors are discussed. Implications for academic women are highlighted.
Elsevier