Forbear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access

A Cutler - Language and speech, 1986 - journals.sagepub.com
Language and speech, 1986journals.sagepub.com
Because stress can occur in any position within an English word, lexical prosody could
serve as a minimal distinguishing feature between pairs of words. However, most pairs of
English words with stress pattern opposition also differ vocalically: OBject and obJECT,
CONtent and conTENT have different vowels in their first syllables as well as different stress
patterns. To test whether prosodic information is made use of in auditory word recognition
independently of segmental phonetic information, it is necessary to examine pairs like …
Because stress can occur in any position within an English word, lexical prosody could serve as a minimal distinguishing feature between pairs of words. However, most pairs of English words with stress pattern opposition also differ vocalically: OBject and obJECT, CONtent and conTENT have different vowels in their first syllables as well as different stress patterns. To test whether prosodic information is made use of in auditory word recognition independently of segmental phonetic information, it is necessary to examine pairs like FORbear — forBEAR or TRUSty — trusTEE, semantically unrelated words which exhibit stress pattern opposition but no segmental difference. In a cross-modal priming task, such words produce the priming effects characteristic of homophones, indicating that lexical prosody is not used in the same way as segmental structure to constrain lexical access.
Sage Journals