In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Being Different: An Indian Challenge to Western Universalism
  • Donald Wiebe
Rajiv Malhotra . Being Different: An Indian Challenge to Western Universalism. New Delhi: HarperCollins, 2011.

Being Different is both a critical exploration of the two vastly different metaphysical/ religious world views (the Abrahamic and dharmic families of spiritual traditions) dominant in the United States and India respectively, and a challenge to what the author finds to be an asymmetric power relationship between them. Malhotra does not take up these tasks from a neutral and disinterested point of view. He writes with passion from within an avowedly dharmic stance and with the intention of undermining the attempts to domesticate and expropriate the Indian traditions in a process of inter-religious dialogue that is ultimately based on a Western cosmological framework and religious assumptions. In drawing out the contrast between "tolerance of other religions" and "mutual respect between religions" in his "experiments in proposing mutual respect" in chapter 2, he brilliantly exposes the pretense in Western affirmations of cultural pluralism. He further insightfully suggests that the West—especially the United States—suffers from what he calls "difference anxiety" that can be controlled only by producing a worldwide religious homogeneity that effectively contradicts the deceptively overt commitment to having a diversity of cultures. And against those within the dharmic framework who envy the "riches" of the globalized world (a "difference anxiety" from below, compared to that of the West), he shows that accepting Western cultural assumptions is not essential to participation in the benefits of globalization.

This book is essential reading for Western scholars engaged in cross-cultural studies. Malhotra espouses an "audacity of difference" in any such enterprise that defends both the distinctiveness and the spiritual value of Indian thought that effectively reveals the cultural chauvinism of much Western thought in its encounters with other cultures. Entertaining such audacity without assuming it is simply an apology for Hinduism could well transform the current global multicultural dialogue to positive effect. [End Page 182]

Donald Wiebe
Trinity College, Toronto
...

pdf

Share