- Debatable Questions
Dear Mr. Lee, it's true you told us,when the School Year began, to call you Dinny and we do—in class. But now's the first time we've sent you an actual letter,and with the School Year practically over, we feel peculiar about calling you "Dinny" instead of "Mr. Lee" inour salutation, which Miss Husband tells us is how a formal letter should begin, complemented at the other endby a valediction (we'll deal with that part whenever we get there). Actually only half of our class (just the boys)is (are) writing this letter: in a course like Social Studies, the girls seemed to find it easier to ask (Daddy?) "Dinny"questions than "Mr. Lee." Have you noticed that? Boys prefer asking questions with no girls present at all: the kind of questionsboys want answered in your Social Studies class would be asked a lot more effortlessly once it was understood they would beraised exclusively in what might be known as the Company of Men. For example: How much is owed to Society,how much to Self-Respect, and how much to what our mothers (not our fathers!) have taught us about flushed or unflushed urinals?How social an activity is flushing? Arthur Englander claims (he would, of course) that leaving his pee in urinalsis a demonstration of selfhood, a kind of creative presence (not his words). He has a point of view, except that [End Page 189] viewing it would be the least of our problems, Arthur probably feels that if you flush yourself away, you might not exist...In museums, in railway-stations, and in movie-theaters nowadays, it's all automatic: you just step back, andboom! or maybe whoosh! after which who could begin to recognize the contempt some men have for themselves and for all of us?It's not as if there was a choice—pulling one lever or another, like voting— it's all or nothing now, or justnothing. Because our manners are made for us by machines, they are not really manners any more... Manners must be man-made...Flushing! the word itself is a clue: after all, we can flush with our faces as well as with our toilets (some people don't flushat all—like dogs!—and others can't seem to stop: they're not flushing, they're flush!), and by the way, Duncan Chu says there's a suburb ofNew York City called Flushing Meadows: just think, a whole field doing nothing but flushing, and people actually live there!You know, Mr. Lee, now that we've written you most of our letter on Hamlet's problem: "To Flush or not To Flush" (just kidding),it seems a lot less weird to talk about it than we first thought—could the girls in our class have something to contribute? Maybenext week we could all learn together, though some (boys) believe that a Standing Posture has to have a lot (everything) to dowith attitude, especially on voiding occasions. Looking forward, therefore, to next week's classes, (signed) Yours Faithfully,Kenneth & Jonathan Klein, David McConnehey, Michael Hopkinson, Duncan Chu, David Stashower. Please Note: Arthur [End Page 190] Englander would not sign this letter, but refused to let us delete his name occurring therein. Apologies. [End Page 191]
Richard Howard is the author of fifteen volumes of poetry and four volumes of criticism. His third book, Untitled Subjects, won the Pulitzer Prize in Poetry in 1970. His poem "Debatable Questions" in his Forthcoming book Progressive Education published by Turtle Point Press.