In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Jewish Studies: A Theoretical Introduction
  • Steven Leonard Jacobs, Aaron Aronov Endowed Chair of Judaic Studies
Jewish Studies: A Theoretical Introduction, by Andrew Bush. New Brunswick and London: Rutgers University Press, 2011. 150 pp. $39.95.

Andrew Bush's slender volume Jewish Studies: A Theoretical Introduction is evidence of the commitment to serious scholarship in a relatively new academic field, first arising in Germany in the nineteenth century after Jews were "released" from their ghettoes and permitted to enter universities after the nation-state of France first led the way in 1789, and still trying to fully articulate not only its object(s) of study but its validity in Western secular universities, the acknowledged home for much of contemporary scholarship today. This text, the first in a new series "Key Words in Jewish Studies" to be published by Rutgers University Press (Series Editors Deborah Dash Moore and Macdonald Moore, both at the University of Michigan; and Bush himself at Vassar College, New York), is the template for all subsequent volumes (none of which are even suggested as future titles anywhere in the book), as the editors write in the Foreword: [End Page 201]

The volumes in the series share a common organization. They open with a first section, Terms of Debate, which defines the key word (i.e. in this case "Jewish Studies") as it developed over the course of Jewish history. . . . The second section, State of the Question, analyzes contemporary debates in scholarship and popular venues, especially for those key words that have crossed over into popular culture. The final section, In a New Key, explicitly addresses contemporary culture and future possibilities for understanding the key word.

(p. x)

In this particular instance, Bush's "Introduction: To What May This Be Likened?" (pp. 1-10) should have been combined with Chapter One, "Terms of Debate" (pp. 11-49), for both trace the history of Jewish/Judaic studies and its departure from yeshivot and rabbinical seminaries to the aforementioned Western universities and with it the lessening of such authorities to dictate either the persons who may study this material or the methodologies by which such material is investigated. If, in fact, Judaic/Jewish studies—the choice of terms is itself suggestive: "Judaic" is seemingly the more academic and objective; "Jewish" the more parochial and subjective—is a legitimate activity of study, then Bush is on target when he notes early on: "The fundamental question for studying Jews is not how to maintain a relationship to the Jewish God, to the Jewish Book, or to the Jewish people, but what kind of object does one study when studying Jews" (p. 1). The response to that singular question, no easy answer to be sure, largely determines Judaic/Jewish studies curricula today.

Yet tensions continue to present themselves when studying Jews (and, therefore, Judaism) to the degree to which organized and aggressively active Jewish communities and organizations view universities as both places for "saving the souls" of Jewish young people and battlegrounds for Israel advocacy as a counter and challenge to the antisemitism and anti-Zionism prevalent in too many American, British, and other Western universities. Yet, Bush reminds us, "It is not the purpose of Jewish Studies in the nonsectarian university to make students Jewish or more Jewish, whatever those expressions might mean" (p. 4).

As regards the unknowable future of Judaic/Jewish studies, "the Jewish Studies to come will depend on political developments and material conditions as yet unrealized and so radically unpredictable" (p. 5). In the current moment, at least in the United States, where the economy continues to take a substantial hit and Jewish populations are either shrinking or growing slightly, both significantly disproportionately smaller to the larger society and other sub-populations (e.g. Hispanics and Blacks), future justifications for studying Jews (and Judaism) may become relegated to both historians and religious studies scholars investigating a past rather than a present and future viable group or groups. (Interestingly enough, political science and international [End Page 202] relations scholars may prove the shape of things to come as Israel and the Middle East show no signs whatsoever of decreasing their presence on the world's stage.)

In Chapter...

pdf