-
Cognitive Science and Thought Experiments: A Refutation of Paul Thagard’s Skepticism
- Perspectives on Science
- The MIT Press
- Volume 22, Number 2, Summer 2014
- pp. 264-287
- Article
- Additional Information
Paul Thagard has recently argued that thought experiments are dangerous and misleading when we try to use them as evidence for claims. This paper refutes his skepticism. Building on Thagard’s own work in cognitive science, I suggest that Thagard has much that is positive to say about how thought experiments work. My last section presents some new directions for research on the intersection between thought experiments and cognitive science.