-
Democracy and Development in Latin America
- Latin American Research Review
- University of Texas Press
- Volume 40, Number 2, 2005
- pp. 207-220
- 10.1353/lar.2005.0029
- Review
- Additional Information
Latin American Research Review 40.2 (2005) 207-220
[Access article in PDF]
Democracy And Development In Latin America
George Philip
Most of the books under review deal with democratization, democracy, and market reform. They offer a considerable variety of perspectives. Weyland, Corrales, and Eaton have produced the most theoretically ambitious works of political science considered here. They are principally concerned with market reform policies in the early 1990s. Weyland and Corrales also bring their accounts relatively up to date with discussion of more recent events. All three works are substantially about Menem's Argentina. So is Llanos's study, which is not comparative, but is convincing in what it covers. Biglaiser's work is also a serious attempt to understand the politics of economic reform, mainly from the perspective of the military governments of the Southern Cone that ruled in the 1970s and early 1980s. The best general discussion of some central topics in the politics of Latin American development occurs in Payne et al. The editors provide an excellent compilation of information on Latin America's diverse patterns of democratic institutionalization, plus some thorough analysis of key topics, and an intelligent and balanced commentary. The González collection, which constitutes the proceedings of a conference of economists and financial professionals, is very interesting in places, although some of it is inevitably rather technical. It is, though, something of a miscellany. Several chapters in the work have nothing much to do with the second stage of macroeconomic reform in Latin America. Even so, the volume contains chapters that, in a very sophisticated way, deal with issues that should be at the heart of any discussion of the politics of macroeconomic policy in the region.
Nun offers what is essentially an extended essay, which makes a number of provocative and interesting points of a philosophical nature while advocating essentially social democratic values. The work is very well worth reading. The Pérez and the Prevost and Campos volumes are edited collections that contain some interesting pieces. However, they are comparatively light in comparison with the other works under review, and the Prevost and Campos volume is essentially a miscellany. The Pérez collection at least focuses on Panama and has the merit of adding to a rather limited amount of scholarly material on that country.
The Payne volume introduces a central problem. Latin American democracy has...