In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • The Death of Classical Cinema: Hitchcock, Lang, Minnelli
  • James Lohrey
The Death of Classical Cinema: Hitchcock, Lang, Minnelli Joe McElhaney . Albany: New York Press, 2006, 255 pp.

The death of classical cinema is by far the most comprehensive look at three distinct filmmakers and their approach between classical and modernist cinema. Author Joe McElhaney defines in the introduction of his book the differences between the classical and modernist approaches to filmmaking. The introduction not so much gives us a detailed narrative of the history of film up to the modernist period, but details the changes that have taken place since the end of World War II. All three filmmakers highlighted in this book—Fritz Lang, Alfred Hitchcock, and Vincente Minnelli—began their careers prior to the war, but their work changed dramatically as time progressed up until the 1970s. Each of them has established a considerable amount of work to be analyzed, but each has one film that can be considered a breaking point in his career. The examination of these breaking points in the book offers detailed explanations about the filmmakers' decline in their respective careers—a decline according to audience reception, but not so much according to critics and theorists who have studied these films. At first glance, it would seem appropriate for the reader to view all the films described in the book, but with even the slightest appreciation of filmmaking, the reader should fully comprehend the parallels McElhaney describes.

The book is clearly divided in three chapters, with one distinct film from each of the filmmakers. McElhaney approaches the first chapter with regard to Lang's earlier films of the German Wiemer's cinema. Released in 1961, The Thousand Eyes of Dr. Mabuse received a warm reception in Paris, where it premiered. Like so many of Lang's films, this film provides us with the paranoid environment of the urban landscape and depicts what madness is embodied within its walls. In the tradition of Metropolis and M, Lang approaches Dr. Mabuse with the paranoia of one's psyche and disturbance. Lang's later works, including the film discussed in this book, examine the political and social surroundings of that time. McElhaney notes, "The Thousand Eyes [of Dr. Mabuse] implicitly contains within itself an awareness of its own limitations while simultaneously offering particular insights into the issue of political and technological power, which are both related to an different from the more fashionable works of modern cinema that surround it during the early 1960s" (33).

Two central themes, as McElhaney writes, are the focus in Lang's films, but it becomes apparent that these themes can be applied to Hitchcock and Minnelli as well—the matter of space and the editing techniques. As with any great art form, film devices are borrowed from the past. Incorporating these devices into their own form is what makes filmmakers distinguishable within the industry. We see examples of this repeatedly in Lang's The Thousand Eyes, as he inexplicably uses the Lumière Brothers' sense of doors closing and opening and the idea of space.

Building on the idea of space, McElhaney moves on to Hitchcock's Marnie in an argument about the transition from classical to modern cinema. Hitchcock has been well reviewed and analyzed over the years, but Marnie is a film that somehow is never discussed enough. Made in 1964, a year after The Birds and a few years after Psycho, Marnie was a financial and critical failure. At this point in Hitchcock's career, we start to see a director burdened with the notion of the traditional melodrama and use of the same devices over and over again. Much like Lang, Hitchcock has centrally built his films around space. In Marnie, characters are [End Page 122] isolated throughout the course of the film. This technique is clearly borrowed from European cinema in the way that Renoir used isolation and space in Rules of the Game or how Antonioni used character isolation in L'Avventura. McElhaney calls his Marnie chapter "Fascination and Rape." The chapter calls upon fragments of Hitchcock's film that examine the use of forcible rape—a device Hitchcock himself had never used...

pdf

Share