In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Erzbischof Johannes Dyba. "Unverschämt katholisch"
  • Peter Hoffmann
Erzbischof Johannes Dyba. "Unverschämt katholisch". Edited by Gotthard Klein and Monica Sinderhauf. [Quaestiones NON Disputatae, Band VI.] (Siegburg:Verlag Franz Schmitt. 2002. Pp. 592.)

Archbishop Johannes Dyba (1929-2000) was an "agitator" for the Catholic faith: "unabashedly Catholic." He declared that he always wanted to be a priest, not an administrator. Trained in law and having served as a Vatican diplomat for over twenty years, he was elevated to the Archbishopric of Fulda in 1983. He developed a habit of speaking with deliberate disdain for conventional "correctness." The editors' biographical sketch presents a man who chose to be a godly provocateur. A Social-Democrat politician's accusation of "publicist fanaticism" and an "aggressiveness" that was "dangerous" because Dyba accepted that he hurt his opponents is followed by Cardinal Ratzinger's acknowledgment that Dyba was never an opportunist and did not mince words, but that the frequent and vicious attacks upon him caused him to suffer, and that he did it all for his faith.

The selections from Dyba's sermons, homilies, speeches, and interviews are organized chronologically, to give the reader a realistic view of life in Church [End Page 426] and society during the seventeen years of Dyba's archiepiscopate (1983-2000). There is no attempt at a comprehensive listing of the Archbishop's recorded utterances or of his papers. Topics in the selections may be traced through the detailed subject index (although eighty undifferentiated entries on "Papacy" are not as helpful as the editors no doubt intended).

At his inauguration as Archbishop of Fulda in 1983, Dyba remarked upon the many unhappy, bitter, fear-distorted faces among his affluent German compatriots and challenged his hearers to reflect to the world the joyful knowledge of being God's children destined for eternal salvation. He demanded acceptance of Christian fundamentals: trust in God's gift of peace as the fruit of faith, the practice of true brotherhood as a personal contribution to peace, and faith in God's promise of eternal life. And he related Christian teaching to contemporary issues. When students opposed to defensive measures against Soviet nuclear missiles challenged him to agree that the Sermon on the Mount must surely be in force, as in "turning the other cheek," he agreed and asked them whether they practiced this in their personal lives, and whether they advocated this for management-labor relations, to both of which, of course, they could only say "no," and then he convicted them of proposing to turn the other cheek to the Soviets but not the Americans.

Dyba does not resolve the contradiction between confidence in God's mercy on the one side, and mass suffering and killing on the other. When the question was put to him, "if there was a God, why did he allow mass murder?" (the "Auschwitz Question"), he answered that God had given humans free will; but he would insist that God had not merely created humans and had then left them entirely to govern themselves in autonomy, but that He clearly instructed them in what they must do. His ultimate answer was always Faith.

Apparently Dyba never worked in theology. The bibliography lists remarkably few of his publications, the most learned ones being two dissertations on international treaties. Dyba insisted on fundamental values, but he was not a stern and inflexible theologian. He knew that there was no abstract justice, but that principles were modified by circumstance: "Thou shalt not kill" referred to illegitimate killing, not to killing in a war. The forty index entries for "sin" reveal general references. Although Dyba constantly spoke about some of the Seven Deadly Sins, he did not list them as an explanation of what was wrong with society. Although he was constantly concerned with the moral teaching of the Church, his references to the sin of abortion, for example, were flexible, not apodictic: he condemned a "holocaust" against unborn children, but allowed that women might despair and see no alternative to abortion, and he believed that God would forgive them.

Peter Hoffmann
McGill University
...

pdf

Share