<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:ag="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/aggregation/"   
  xmlns:annotate="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/annotate/"
  xmlns:g="http://base.google.com/ns/1.0"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"   
  xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
  xmlns:ctx="http://www.openurl.info/registry/fmt/xml/rss10/ctx"
  xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

  <channel rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/feeds/latest_articles?jid=76">
    <title>Project MUSE&#x00AE;: Journal of the History of Philosophy - Latest Articles</title>
    <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76</link>
    <description>Project MUSE&#x00AE;: Latest articles in Journal of the History of Philosophy.</description>

    <!-- ADMIN -->
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/cgi-bin/support.cgi"/>
    <!-- ADMIN -->

    <!-- SYNDICATION -->
    <sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <sy:updateBase>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</sy:updateBase>
    <!-- SYNDICATION -->

    <!-- DUBLIN -->
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
    <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
    <dc:coverage>Vol. 1 (1963) through current issue</dc:coverage>
    <dc:description>Latest Articles: Journal of the History of Philosophy</dc:description>
    
    <!-- DUBLIN -->

    <!-- PRISM -->
    <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
    <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
    <prism:publicationName>Journal of the History of Philosophy</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:eIssn>1538-4586</prism:eIssn>
    <prism:issn>0022-5053</prism:issn>
    <prism:byteCount></prism:byteCount>
    <prism:teaser>Latest articles in Journal of the History of Philosophy. Feed provided by Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:teaser>
    <!-- PRISM -->

    <image rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/images/nav_calliope.gif" />

    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986602" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986603" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986604" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986606" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986607" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986609" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986610" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986611" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986612" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986613" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986614" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986615" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986616" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986617" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986618" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986619" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />

      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>


<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986602">
  <title>Soul and Body in Aristotle's Theory of Perception</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986602</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    aristotle famously says that perception involves the reception of an object&amp;#39;s &amp;#x22;perceptible form&amp;#x22; without its &amp;#x22;matter.&amp;#x22; In relation to perceptible objects, we are like pieces of wax that receive a ring&amp;#39;s impression without retaining its iron or gold (De an. 2.12, 424a17&amp;#x2013;20).1Let us call this the &amp;#x22;form without matter&amp;#x22; doctrine of perception. It served as the basis for theories of cognition in late antiquity and the Middle Ages, and it might seem to belong with the geocentric model of the universe or the theory of humors as part of a scientific worldview that we abandoned centuries ago. That is certainly how it seemed to early modern philosophers at the vanguard of the New Science: in the Leviathan, Hobbes ridicules 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986602"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Soul and Body in Aristotle's Theory of Perception</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Soul and Body in Aristotle's Theory of Perception</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>151982</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986603">
  <title>Maimonides's Skeptical Critique of a Divine Intellect, or the Curious Case of Guide I.68</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986603</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    few chapters in maimonides&amp;#39;s Guide of the Perplexed are situated as centrally in the history of philosophy as part I, chapter 68 (henceforth: I.68). It opens by addressing the reader:

You already know that the following dictum of the philosophers with reference to God &amp;#x2026; is generally admitted: [i] the dictum being that He is the intellect as well as the intellectually cognizing subject and the intellectually cognized object, and [ii] that those three notions form in Him &amp;#x2026; one single notion in which there is no multiplicity.
(I.68, 163, my roman numerals).1

This dictum has its origins in Aristotle and the Arabic falasifa and in turn influenced figures such as Leibniz, Solomon Maimon, and Spinoza.2 In two 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986603"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Maimonides's Skeptical Critique of a Divine Intellect, or the Curious Case of Guide I.68</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Maimonides's Skeptical Critique of a Divine Intellect, or the Curious Case of Guide I.68</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>173467</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986604">
  <title>Berkeley's Theory of Vision: A New Look</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986604</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    berkeley&amp;#39;s theory of vision is both an important part of his idealist philosophical system1 and an influential early work in the foundations of vision science.2 According to the theory, the visual process begins with experience of the proper object of sight, a collection of visible ideas of light and color that occur when an image is projected onto the retina. Through experience, we come to associate these visible ideas with tangible ideas of distance, size, shape, and situation.3 These tangible ideas consist in tactile, haptic, or kinesthetic experiences&amp;#x2014;feeling the bulgy, rounded shape of an object, feeling your body move a certain distance through space as you traverse a landscape, and so on.4 Once visible ideas 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986604"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Berkeley's Theory of Vision: A New Look</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Berkeley's Theory of Vision: A New Look</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>144647</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986606">
  <title>Bagehot on Belief</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986606</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    the victorian political commentator Walter Bagehot (1826&amp;#x2013;77) is best known today for his analysis of the efficient and the dignified functions of government in The English Constitution (1867), and perhaps also for his formative and agenda-setting editorship of The Economist from 1861 to 1877. Some will also know him for his natural history of civilization in Physics and Politics (1872) or for his seminal study of the financial market in Lombard Street (1873). Scholars of the nineteenth-century &amp;#x22;higher journalism&amp;#x22; are familiar with his prolific outpouring of social and economic commentary, his historical essays, and his literary criticism.For philosophers and historians of philosophy, however, Jacques Barzun&amp;#39;s 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986606"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Bagehot on Belief</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Bagehot on Belief</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>118870</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986607">
  <title>Spinoza: Scholarship Since 2000</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986607</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    a random sampling of citizens today in any number of countries around the world would turn up very few, if any, Cartesians, Gassendists, or Leibnizians. The same polling, however, would very likely reveal quite a few Spinozists&amp;#x2014;individuals who have not only read Spinoza (in university classes, reading groups, or on their own) but also believe that he pretty much got it all right, and thus who have taken his ideas on God, religion, ethics, and politics to heart. Early modern scholars, of course, continue to produce serious work on Descartes, Gassendi, Locke, Leibniz, and their contemporaries. But Spinoza also has many fans&amp;#x2014;civilians outside academia (the Dutch would call them liefhebbers, amateurs) who are deeply 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986607"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Spinoza: Scholarship Since 2000</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Spinoza: Scholarship Since 2000</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>234530</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986609">
  <title>Fractured Goodness: Aristotle's Response to Plato's Form of the Good by Christopher Shields (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986609</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    Christopher Shields&amp;#39;s Fractured Goodness is a welcome study of Aristotle&amp;#39;s criticisms of the Platonic Form of the Good.The focus of the book is Nicomachean Ethics (NE) 1.6, though Shields occasionally supplements his discussion with material from the parallel chapter in the Eudemian Ethics, 1.8. The book naturally divides into three parts. Its first part, comprising chapters 1 and 2, is preliminary. Here, Shields sketches an account of the Form of the Good, translates NE 1.6 in its entirety, and presents reconstructions of Aristotle&amp;#39;s arguments that he goes on to discuss later in the book. He also outlines two common, if extreme, reactions to NE 1.6&amp;#x2014;that it is either a dismal failure or a rousing success&amp;#x2014;between 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986609"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Fractured Goodness: Aristotle's Response to Plato's Form of the Good by Christopher Shields (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Fractured Goodness: Aristotle's Response to Plato's Form of the Good by Christopher Shields (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>7216</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986610">
  <title>The Politics of German Idealism: Law and Social Change at the Turn of the 19th Century by Christopher Yeomans (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986610</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    Christopher Yeomans&amp;#39;s The Politics of German Idealism articulates and applies a distinctive historiographical method for writing the history of German Idealist political philosophy. Yeomans&amp;#39;s excellent book will be required reading both for historians of philosophy working on the particular figures and topics he deals with, and for those interested in the history of political thought more broadly.Yeomans adopts an interpretative framework developed by Reinhart Koselleck for understanding the Sattelzeit period of German history (roughly, 1770&amp;#x2013;1830). Yeomans&amp;#39;s approach is a specific kind of Koselleckian historicism, which views the German Idealists&amp;#39; historical present as a &amp;#x22;field of tension&amp;#x22; between three poles: 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986610"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>The Politics of German Idealism: Law and Social Change at the Turn of the 19th Century by Christopher Yeomans (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>The Politics of German Idealism: Law and Social Change at the Turn of the 19th Century by Christopher Yeomans (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>9568</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986611">
  <title>Transcendental Idealism and Metaphysics: Husserl's Critique of Heidegger. Vol I by Daniele De Santis; and: Transcendental Idealism and Metaphysics: Husserl's Critique of Heidegger. Vol 2 by Daniele De Santis (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986611</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    Any number of commentators have summarized the history of early phenomenology as the transition from Edmund Husserl&amp;#39;s phenomenology to Martin Heidegger&amp;#39;s fundamental ontology, a narrative that views Heidegger&amp;#39;s ontology as having dealt a fatal blow to Husserl&amp;#39;s phenomenology. Daniele De Santis challenges this narrative. In a manner at once historical, systematic, and exhaustive, he reinterprets and reevaluates Husserl&amp;#39;s response to Heidegger and positions Husserl&amp;#39;s late philosophy as a carefully wrought challenge to Heidegger&amp;#39;s fundamental ontology. De Santis&amp;#39;s research is meticulous and thorough, but the urge to incorporate all of it into this work leads to excessive length, digressions, and repetitions. The urge
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986611"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Transcendental Idealism and Metaphysics: Husserl's Critique of Heidegger. Vol I by Daniele De Santis; and: Transcendental Idealism and Metaphysics: Husserl's Critique of Heidegger. Vol 2 by Daniele De Santis (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Transcendental Idealism and Metaphysics: Husserl's Critique of Heidegger. Vol I by Daniele De Santis; and: Transcendental Idealism and Metaphysics: Husserl's Critique of Heidegger. Vol 2 by Daniele De Santis (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>12954</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986612">
  <title>La notion de volonté dans les écrits de saint Augustin entre 388 et 404 by Evgenia Moiseeva (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986612</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    There is a substantial body of scholarship that recognizes Augustine as a pivotal figure in the development of the concept of will within Western thought. For example, Hannah Arendt&amp;#39;s opinion, as expressed in The Life of the Mind, is well known: Augustine was &amp;#x22;the first philosopher of the will.&amp;#x22; However, the formation of the concept of will within Augustine&amp;#39;s own thought has never been subjected to systematic study until now. This comprehensive monograph by Evgenia Moiseeva addresses this gap by focusing on the process that led Augustine to the renowned description of his own will in book 8 of the Confessions.An initial attempt to examine the notion of will in Augustine&amp;#39;s works prior to the Confessions was made by 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986612"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>La notion de volonté dans les écrits de saint Augustin entre 388 et 404 by Evgenia Moiseeva (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>La notion de volonté dans les écrits de saint Augustin entre 388 et 404 by Evgenia Moiseeva (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>11029</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986613">
  <title>On the Divine Things and Their Revelation by Friedrich Henrich Jacobi (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986613</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    This is the first English translation of Jacobi&amp;#39;s condensed and richly evocative final book, published with a valuable introductory &amp;#x22;Study&amp;#x22; by the translator, Paolo Livieri. On the Divine Things was not included in the landmark Main Philosophical Writings edited and translated by George di Giovanni in 1994 (McGill-Queen&amp;#39;s University Press), so this is a welcome addition to Jacobi&amp;#39;s work in English. Livieri consulted with di Giovanni and correlated the translation of key terms in the two volumes. The translated book and Livieri&amp;#39;s &amp;#x22;Study&amp;#x22; also work in tandem on several levels. Livieri&amp;#39;s treatment of the historical and intellectual context is thoroughly researched; it locates the Divine Things within the framework of 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986613"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>On the Divine Things and Their Revelation by Friedrich Henrich Jacobi (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>On the Divine Things and Their Revelation by Friedrich Henrich Jacobi (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>7179</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986614">
  <title>Neoplatonic Pedagogy and the Alcibiades I: Crafting the Contemplative by James M. Ambury (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986614</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    This monograph adds to the growing interest among English-language scholars in late Neoplatonist readings of Plato, in this case the Alcibiades I. Taking the extant commentaries of Proclus and Olympiodorus as his central sources, Ambury places the Alcibiades I within the pedagogical framework developed by the late Neoplatonists, who made this dialogue the first Platonic work to be read in the Academy&amp;#39;s curriculum, implicitly bracketing the modern dispute over its authenticity and treating the dialogue, as the Neoplatonists did, as a natural part of the Platonic course of study. Using the Neoplatonic reading as a point of departure, Ambury treats Alcibiades I as a work that transforms its students&amp;#39; souls, inasmuch 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986614"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Neoplatonic Pedagogy and the Alcibiades I: Crafting the Contemplative by James M. Ambury (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Neoplatonic Pedagogy and the Alcibiades I: Crafting the Contemplative by James M. Ambury (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>7593</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986615">
  <title>Rousseau's God: Theology, Religion, and the Natural Goodness of Man by John T. Scott (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986615</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    In Rousseau&amp;#39;s God, John Scott offers a bold, dense, nuanced, diachronic overview of the role of God in Rousseau&amp;#39;s philosophical, political, and religious writings. The chapters of the book follow the chronological order of Rousseau&amp;#39;s publications from his second Discourse (1755) to Emile and The Social Contract (1762). One notable exception is the first chapter, which expands both before and after the said publication period.The question of Rousseau&amp;#39;s God can be approached from various angles that are not easily reconcilable. While Rousseau&amp;#39;s doctrine of the natural goodness of man is often interpreted in light of the concept of theodicy as a theoretical or practical response to the problem of evil, Scott argues 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986615"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Rousseau's God: Theology, Religion, and the Natural Goodness of Man by John T. Scott (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Rousseau's God: Theology, Religion, and the Natural Goodness of Man by John T. Scott (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>7673</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986616">
  <title>The "Critique of Judgment" and the Unity of Kant's Critical System by Lara Ostaric (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986616</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    Lara Ostaric&amp;#39;s The &amp;#x22;Critique of Judgment&amp;#x22; and the Unity of Kant&amp;#39;s Critical System is an ambitious work, confronting three topics that interpreters of Kant&amp;#39;s Critique of the Power of Judgment (CPJ) usually treat separately. Ostaric explains why the CPJ signals the end of the Critical system, why it forms a systematically unified whole, and how it successfully proves the objective reality of freedom in nature.Ostaric&amp;#39;s interpretation unfolds across nine individually readable chapters. The three chapters composing part I focus on Kant&amp;#39;s moral philosophy. Chapter 1 argues that construing our freedom as &amp;#x22;objectively real&amp;#x22; is tantamount to saying we can practically (not theoretically) cognize the object corresponding to 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986616"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>The "Critique of Judgment" and the Unity of Kant's Critical System by Lara Ostaric (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>The "Critique of Judgment" and the Unity of Kant's Critical System by Lara Ostaric (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>7838</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986617">
  <title>Consciousness, Time, and Scepticism in Hume's Thought by Lorne Falkenstein (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986617</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    Lorne Falkenstein&amp;#39;s book is a challenging study of some of the most perplexing, yet underdiscussed problems in Hume&amp;#39;s epistemology and metaphysics. The general focus of Consciousness, Time, and Scepticism (CTS) is the reconciliation of Hume&amp;#39;s skeptical empiricism with his naturalism. Falkenstein views the problem and its resolution from multiple new angles with the critical insight only a seasoned scholar of Hume and the eighteenth century could possess. Specifically, CTS deals with what Falkenstein calls a &amp;#x22;practical&amp;#x22; problem about belief for Hume: Hume recommends that we proportion our beliefs to the evidence, but the evidence is always experiential, which Hume shows to be unreliable (1, 3). This problem is 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986617"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Consciousness, Time, and Scepticism in Hume's Thought by Lorne Falkenstein (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Consciousness, Time, and Scepticism in Hume's Thought by Lorne Falkenstein (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>7393</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986618">
  <title>Science of the Soul in Ibn Sīnā's "Pointers and Reminders": A Philological Study by Michael A. Rapoport (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986618</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    Avicenna&amp;#39;s stance vis-&amp;#xE0;-vis mysticism and Sufism has been a topic of disagreement among scholars for decades. The proponents of a mystical/Sufi side to Avicenna&amp;#39;s thought marshal the last portion of his Pointers and Reminders as supportive evidence. The ninth nama&amp;#x1E6D; (section) of the second part is crucial in this regard, for there Avicenna adopts a Sufi-colored terminology and addresses traditionally Sufi topics (purification, exercise, knowledge of God).Rapoport weighs in on the debate with the stated goal of proving that, despite appearances to the contrary, Pointers does not support mystical/Sufi readings. Accordingly, Pointers does not deviate from other Avicennian works in any fundamental way, but rather merely 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986618"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Science of the Soul in Ibn Sīnā's "Pointers and Reminders": A Philological Study by Michael A. Rapoport (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Science of the Soul in Ibn Sīnā's "Pointers and Reminders": A Philological Study by Michael A. Rapoport (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>8684</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986619">
  <title>Determinism and Enlightenment: The Collaboration of Diderot and d'Holbach by Ruggero Sciuto (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986619</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    Ruggero Sciuto&amp;#39;s book is one of several works that, over the last few decades, have helped to shape a new image of Enlightenment philosophy, one that is less simplistic than those produced by the great narratives of modernity, all of which tend to render its content homogeneous and rather superficial. Sciuto does the opposite: he tackles head-on a fundamental philosophical problem, that of determinism, to show that Enlightenment thought responded to it in original, profound, and varied ways. He does so by bringing to the fore two Enlightenment thinkers who have often been neglected, one less so than the other in recent decades: Denis Diderot and Paul Thiry, baron d&amp;#39;Holbach. Sciuto&amp;#39;s book thus contributes to 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986619"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Determinism and Enlightenment: The Collaboration of Diderot and d'Holbach by Ruggero Sciuto (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Determinism and Enlightenment: The Collaboration of Diderot and d'Holbach by Ruggero Sciuto (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>6433</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620">
  <title>The Unity of Reason, Reconsidered: On the "Autonomy of Ideas" in the Later Kant</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    kant famously treats theoretical and practical reason as two distinct faculties, admitting of two different critiques and resulting in the construction of two different systems&amp;#x2014;a system of metaphysics (including science) and a system of morals. While theoretical reason is tempted to illegitimately transcend the bounds of experience, practical reason validly derives its principles from pure moral concepts or ideas, abstracted from everything empirical. Thus, as Kant insists in GMS, &amp;#x22;Human reason, even in the commonest understanding, can easily be brought to a high measure of correctness and accuracy in moral matters, whereas in its theoretical but pure use it is totally and entirely dialectical&amp;#x22; (GMS 4:391).Despite 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/76/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>The Unity of Reason, Reconsidered: On the "Autonomy of Ideas" in the Later Kant</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-31</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>The Unity of Reason, Reconsidered: On the "Autonomy of Ideas" in the Later Kant</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/986620" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-31</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>154234</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-31</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>


</rdf:RDF>
