<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:ag="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/aggregation/"   
  xmlns:annotate="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/annotate/"
  xmlns:g="http://base.google.com/ns/1.0"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"   
  xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
  xmlns:ctx="http://www.openurl.info/registry/fmt/xml/rss10/ctx"
  xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

  <channel rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/feeds/latest_articles?jid=527">
    <title>Project MUSE&#x00AE;: Toronto Journal of Theology - Latest Articles</title>
    <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527</link>
    <description>Project MUSE&#x00AE;: Latest articles in Toronto Journal of Theology.</description>

    <!-- ADMIN -->
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/cgi-bin/support.cgi"/>
    <!-- ADMIN -->

    <!-- SYNDICATION -->
    <sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <sy:updateBase>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</sy:updateBase>
    <!-- SYNDICATION -->

    <!-- DUBLIN -->
    <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
    <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
    <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
    <dc:coverage>Vol. 27 (2011) through vol. 41 (2025)</dc:coverage>
    <dc:description>Latest Articles: Toronto Journal of Theology</dc:description>
    
    <!-- DUBLIN -->

    <!-- PRISM -->
    <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
    <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
    <prism:publicationName>Toronto Journal of Theology</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:eIssn>1918-6371</prism:eIssn>
    <prism:issn>0826-9831</prism:issn>
    <prism:byteCount></prism:byteCount>
    <prism:teaser>Latest articles in Toronto Journal of Theology. Feed provided by Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:teaser>
    <!-- PRISM -->

    <image rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/images/nav_calliope.gif" />

    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984628" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984629" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984630" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984631" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984632" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984633" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984634" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984635" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984636" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984637" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984638" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984639" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984640" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984641" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984642" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984643" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984644" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984645" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984646" />

<rdf:li resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />

      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>


<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984628">
  <title>The Poetry of Belonging: Healing with the Language of the Wound by Iris J. Gildea (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984628</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    With this book, Iris J. Gildea provides a groundbreaking approach to both trauma theory and healing, particularly for survivors of childhood violence. Her approach is holistic and autoethnographic; it moves beyond reductionist boundaries and restrictive binaries by using frameworks of feminist phenomenology, earth-based spirituality, ancient healing wisdom, and poetic inquiry. The methodology of this book is, therefore, fittingly mixed, combining the author&amp;#x2019;s in-depth scholarly research, first-hand knowledge of being a survivor of extensive sexual violence, and her own embodied healing journey.The book does not contain graphic descriptions of violence, but readers should be cautioned that violence is a theme 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984628"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>The Poetry of Belonging: Healing with the Language of the Wound by Iris J. Gildea (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>The Poetry of Belonging: Healing with the Language of the Wound by Iris J. Gildea (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>6703</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984629">
  <title>With Orca, Goose, and Bear: Expanding Canada’s Ritual Body</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984629</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    In a 2022 interview at Saint Paul University, &amp;#x201C;Truth-telling and Reconciliation,&amp;#x201D; Bishop Shane Parker of the Anglican Diocese of Ottawa spoke about the journey of the Anglican Church of Canada in relationship to Indigenous peoples.1 Where once it was a perpetrator of violence against Indigenous peoples, it now aspires to be a reconciler among Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples. &amp;#x201C;If I walked into a church in the Anglican diocese here in Ottawa,&amp;#x201D; came the question from the audience, &amp;#x201C;would I recognize that that journey is taking place?&amp;#x201D; In response, Parker highlighted two distinct elements occurring as part of the church&amp;#x2019;s ritual practice: some form of land acknowledgement at the beginning of the liturgical 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984629"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>With Orca, Goose, and Bear: Expanding Canada’s Ritual Body</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>With Orca, Goose, and Bear: Expanding Canada’s Ritual Body</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>98980</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984630">
  <title>Reading “Us” and “Our” in Genesis 1:26 in Light of Al-Qur’ān</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984630</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    There are three primary interpretations of the term &amp;#x201C;Us&amp;#x201D; and &amp;#x201C;Our&amp;#x201D; in Genesis 1:26. The first interpretation posits that the term &amp;#x201C;Us&amp;#x201D; and &amp;#x201C;Our&amp;#x201D; allude to the doctrine of the Trinity. The other interpretation proposes that the term &amp;#x201C;Us&amp;#x201D; and &amp;#x201C;Our&amp;#x201D; suggest that God is speaking to a celestial council, comprising a gathering of spiritual entities such as angels or heavenly hosts. In this interpretation, God is depicted as not solitary but accompanied by other beings, and His use of the plural form signifies the presence of this divine assembly. The last interpretation is majestic plural which sees God, as the ultimate sovereign of the universe, employ the plural to signify His unparalleled authority and majesty. This 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984630"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Reading “Us” and “Our” in Genesis 1:26 in Light of Al-Qur’ān</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Reading “Us” and “Our” in Genesis 1:26 in Light of Al-Qur’ān</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>67549</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984631">
  <title>The Hope of Glory: A Theology of Redemption by Ian A. McFarland (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984631</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    Ian McFarland is the Robert W. Woodruff Professor of Theology at the Candler School of Theology in Atlanta, Georgia. In this book, he offers a distinctive perspective on Christian hope. He argues that a proper understanding of this must be based on Jesus&amp;#x2019;s resurrection but must also have some grounding in the present.McFarland begins by weeding out inadequate alternative eschatologies. Premillennialism, which hopes for rescue from earthly troubles by deliverance to heaven, maintains a connection between the hope for future well-being and what happens in history, but it severs the connection between Jesus&amp;#x2019;s proclamation of the reign of God and the hope of glory. McFarland categorizes this as escapism. Postmillennial 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984631"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>The Hope of Glory: A Theology of Redemption by Ian A. McFarland (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>The Hope of Glory: A Theology of Redemption by Ian A. McFarland (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>6463</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984632">
  <title>A Church at War: MacKay Presbyterian Church, New Edinburgh, and the First World War by Alan Bowker (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984632</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    What does it mean to say that 66,000 Canadians died in the First World War? How do we comprehend that over 57,000 Entente soldiers died on the first day of the Battle of the Somme, including 700 from Newfoundland? The numbers can numb us to the reality. It is only through stories that we can begin (and I hasten to add, only begin) to understand the scope of the loss.Alan Bowker provides these stories in this thorough and detailed exploration of one Presbyterian congregation in Ottawa, Ontario. Like so many Canadian congregations in this period, MacKay Presbyterian Church (now MacKay United Church) has memorials to honour those who died in the Great War. MacKay Presbyterian sanctuary has two plaques: a memorial 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984632"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>A Church at War: MacKay Presbyterian Church, New Edinburgh, and the First World War by Alan Bowker (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>A Church at War: MacKay Presbyterian Church, New Edinburgh, and the First World War by Alan Bowker (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>6411</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984633">
  <title>Soul-Making by Grace: Purgatory’s Past, Present, and Future by Matthew S. Hendzel, SJ (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984633</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    For many Roman Catholics, the doctrine of purgatory rests uneasily within the expression of their faith, seeming to be out of step with current theology. It is this unease that Matthew Hendzel addresses in his new work, Soul-Making by Grace. Consideration of the doctrine of purgatory is taken up within the context of two issues: first, how the traditionally punitive understanding of purgatory can be brought into line with the more merciful, pastoral approach of contemporary Catholic theology and second, how the doctrine of purgatory may be made more pastorally relevant to Catholics today. Hendzel answers both questions by drawing on John Hick and his soul-making theodicy.Hendzel opens the work with a brief 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984633"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Soul-Making by Grace: Purgatory’s Past, Present, and Future by Matthew S. Hendzel, SJ (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Soul-Making by Grace: Purgatory’s Past, Present, and Future by Matthew S. Hendzel, SJ (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>6592</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984634">
  <title>The Ethics of Karbala: Myths, Modernity, and Virtues of Nobility by Cyrus Ali Zargar (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984634</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    In The Ethics of Karbala: Myths, Modernity, and Virtues of Nobility, Cyrus Ali Zargar explores the ethical centrality of the Karbala narrative through a virtue ethics framework. The book examines how the memory of the struggle of H. usayn ibn &amp;#x2BF;Al&amp;#x12B;, grandson of the Prophet Muhammad and a figure of sanctity in Islamic tradition, contributes to the moral formation of the communities that commemorate it. Employing an interdisciplinary approach that integrates philosophy, Islamic theology, and history, the author unpacks the tensions between modernity and the martial ethos, arguing that the Karbala narrative continues to offer relevant ethical insight.The study begins with a review of virtue ethics and its relationship 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984634"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>The Ethics of Karbala: Myths, Modernity, and Virtues of Nobility by Cyrus Ali Zargar (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>The Ethics of Karbala: Myths, Modernity, and Virtues of Nobility by Cyrus Ali Zargar (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>6760</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984635">
  <title>Beyond the Academy: Lived Asian Public Theology of Religions by David Thang Moe (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984635</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    Since the coinage of the term public theology in 1974 by Martin E. Marty (1928&amp;#x2013;2025), the field has expanded in and beyond the West. After half a century, David Thang Moe&amp;#x2019;s Beyond the Academy addresses a crisis: public theology &amp;#x201C;has lost its voice and meaning in both the church and public society&amp;#x201D; (p. 31) as it has not incorporated as a significant source &amp;#x201C;the lived experiences and voices of the grassroots communities&amp;#x201D; (p. 3). He seeks to bridge the lived theology with academic theology and calls theologians to reconnect public theology with everyday religion.Moe develops three specific criticisms against the existing Asian theology in Chapter 1 (pp. 6&amp;#x2013;7). He criticizes, first, academic Asian public theologians for 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984635"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Beyond the Academy: Lived Asian Public Theology of Religions by David Thang Moe (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Beyond the Academy: Lived Asian Public Theology of Religions by David Thang Moe (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>7277</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984636">
  <title>The Gospel of Jesus Green: Home for All, Not Just for Humans by Neil J. Whitehouse (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984636</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    How can Christians respond meaningfully to our current ecological morass, which is marked by climate chaos, deep biodiversity loss, and a rapacious, earth-shredding global economic system? In this discursive work, Neil J. Whitehouse, a British-born, Montreal-based ecumenical minister, attempts an answer. Trained as a Methodist minister at Cambridge, Whitehouse pulls from his additional background in zoology and massage therapy to &amp;#x201C;massage&amp;#x201D; the message of Jesus into an ecological hermeneutic. His appellation, &amp;#x201C;Jesus Green,&amp;#x201D; is both intriguing and elusive.Whitehouse identifies four dimensions of &amp;#x201C;green&amp;#x201D;: (1) the energy of biophilia, i.e., love of all living things; (2) the environmental movement; (3) choices of work 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984636"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>The Gospel of Jesus Green: Home for All, Not Just for Humans by Neil J. Whitehouse (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>The Gospel of Jesus Green: Home for All, Not Just for Humans by Neil J. Whitehouse (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>5536</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984637">
  <title>Gregory of Nyssa: On the Human Image of God by John Behr (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984637</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    When considering early Christian discussions on Genesis 1&amp;#x2013;3, nearly everyone will mention Augustine&amp;#x2019;s Literal Meaning of Genesis as well as Basil of Caesarea&amp;#x2019;s Hexaemeron. After these two, Origen is probably the most frequently referenced. Gregory of Nyssa seems to pass by unnoticed in many discussions. This limited recognition is by no means an accurate statement about the significance and value of his works on these topics. John Behr (Regius Chair in Humanity at the University of Aberdeen) has produced a volume that speaks to the value of Gregory&amp;#x2019;s works on Genesis 1&amp;#x2013;3. This volume is an attractive acquisition for its 140-page introduction and the diglot edition of Gregory&amp;#x2019;s De Hominis Opificio. The Greek text is 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984637"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Gregory of Nyssa: On the Human Image of God by John Behr (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Gregory of Nyssa: On the Human Image of God by John Behr (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>6457</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984638">
  <title>Bereshit and Hesiod in Dialogue: The Dependence of Gen 1:1 on Theogony 45</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984638</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    Hesiod&amp;#x2019;s literary activity can be uncontroversially placed within the period from the late eighth to the early sixth century bce.1 At the turn of the sixth and fifth centuries bce, Xenophanes wrote: &amp;#x201C;Homer and Hesiod have attributed to the gods all things that among men are sources of blame and censure: thieving, committing adultery, and deceiving each other&amp;#x201D; (Frg. 11b11 DK). Meanwhile, in the mid-5th century bce, Herodotus wrote the following: &amp;#x201C;I suppose that the time of Hesiod and Homer was not more than four hundred years before my own; and these are they who taught the Greeks of the descent of the gods (&amp;#x3B8;&amp;#x3B5;&amp;#x3BF;&amp;#x3B3;&amp;#x3BF;&amp;#x3BD;&amp;#x1F77;&amp;#x3B7;&amp;#x3BD;), and gave to all their several names, and honors, and arts, and declared their outward forms&amp;#x201D; 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984638"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Bereshit and Hesiod in Dialogue: The Dependence of Gen 1:1 on Theogony 45</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Bereshit and Hesiod in Dialogue: The Dependence of Gen 1:1 on Theogony 45</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>47004</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984639">
  <title>Wine, Soil, and Salvation in the Hebrew Bible and New Testament by Mark Scarlata (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984639</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    In Wine, Soil, and Salvation in the Hebrew Bible and New Testament, Mark Scarlata offers a biblical theology of wine. Tracing wine metaphors through the Hebrew Bible, later Jewish literature, and the New Testament, Scarlata argues that wine was used &amp;#x201C;as a multilayered sign and symbol of life, joy, and celebration, but it also became a sign of judgement, punishment, and condemnation&amp;#x201D; (p. 1). Scarlata observes that drinking wine during times of prosperity and peace on the land enables drinkers to experience God&amp;#x2019;s salvation and covenantal blessing with humanity. Scarlata finds evidence of this positive metaphor in Noah&amp;#x2019;s planting of the vineyard (pp. 32&amp;#x2013;38), the use of wine as a blessing and offering (pp. 44&amp;#x2013;70), and 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984639"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Wine, Soil, and Salvation in the Hebrew Bible and New Testament by Mark Scarlata (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Wine, Soil, and Salvation in the Hebrew Bible and New Testament by Mark Scarlata (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>6341</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984640">
  <title>Occasional Religious Practice: Valuing a Very Ordinary Religious Experience by Sarah Kathleen Johnson (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984640</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    In Occasional Religious Practice: Valuing a Very Ordinary Religious Experience, author Sarah Johnson defines occasional religious practice as participation in religious practices occasionally rather than routinely, often in connection with holidays, life transitions, crises, and incidental circumstances (such as being a tourist, providing transportation to an aging relative, or having a family member visit for the weekend). The author makes the ambitious argument that occasional religious practice is the dominant way in which people relate to Christianity in Canada, the United States, and beyond in the 21st century. To understand the roles of religion in contemporary societies and to do liturgical theology that 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984640"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Occasional Religious Practice: Valuing a Very Ordinary Religious Experience by Sarah Kathleen Johnson (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Occasional Religious Practice: Valuing a Very Ordinary Religious Experience by Sarah Kathleen Johnson (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>8372</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984641">
  <title>Life with Cows and Trinity: A Reflection on Community, Choice, and Authenticity in an Individualized Age</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984641</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    In an age increasingly defined by individualism and personal autonomy, the idea of community can seem at best quaint, and perhaps it can even seem burdensome. Yet, beneath the surface of our carefully curated choices lies a deep yearning for connection, for a meaning that transcends the solitary self. This reflection begins with simple memories of cows. Their presence, and later, their absence, within a particular community of people becomes a lens through which to explore questions about identity, formation, and the nature of authentic living. Having explored the memories of cows, I will outline Charles Taylor&amp;#x2019;s view of secularity and the &amp;#x201C;buffered self,&amp;#x201D; before placing these in conversation with theology, mainly 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984641"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Life with Cows and Trinity: A Reflection on Community, Choice, and Authenticity in an Individualized Age</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Life with Cows and Trinity: A Reflection on Community, Choice, and Authenticity in an Individualized Age</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>44750</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984642">
  <title>Kierkegaard and Eliade on Repetition</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984642</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    Kierkegaard is widely used as a resource for theological and philosophical reflections. His relevance in the history of religion through influence on the Romanian historian of religions is less well known. This study emphasises the Kierkegaardian concept of repetition as being significant for Eliade, with the hope that it might be insightful or serviceable for those studying the philosophy of religion or those working at the disciplinary boundaries of theology, philosophy, and religious studies.A scholarly estimate in Kierkegaard studies holds that Kierkegaard&amp;#x2019;s establishment of the autonomy of religious experience from ethics and metaphysics &amp;#x201C;anticipates Eliade&amp;#x2019;s later anti-reductionist arguments for the 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984642"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Kierkegaard and Eliade on Repetition</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Kierkegaard and Eliade on Repetition</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>58661</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984643">
  <title>Remembering the Future: Toward an Eschatological Ontology by John D. Zizioulas (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984643</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    Everyone interested in the theology of John Zizioulas will find this book a special and unexpected gift. The posthumously published Remembering the Future gives us a rare and precious opportunity to converse anew with the author and gain new insight into the development of his thought in the final phase of his life and work.Zizioulas is one of the most important contemporary Orthodox theologians, and he influenced generations of Orthodox priests and scholars (my own theological approach is very much indebted to Zizioulas).The central theme of the book is hinted at by the title; anyone even superficially familiar with Zizioulas&amp;#x2019;s theology would immediately recognize that this future is not just any future, but the 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984643"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Remembering the Future: Toward an Eschatological Ontology by John D. Zizioulas (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Remembering the Future: Toward an Eschatological Ontology by John D. Zizioulas (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>6713</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984644">
  <title>A Women’s Lectionary for the Whole Church, Year B by Wilda C. Gafney (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984644</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    In this second installment of the three-volume Women&amp;#x2019;s Lectionary for the Whole Church, Wilda C. Gafney presents a compelling and necessary reimagining of the lectionary. Designed for congregations, preachers, and scholars, this resource intentionally centres women and girls in scriptural narratives, offering a more inclusive  approach to biblical engagement. Gafney skillfully curates women&amp;#x2019;s stories in this Year B compilation with a focus on the Gospel of Mark, and she integrates the gospels with the Psalms and the Old Testament texts for the liturgical year.Each lesson within the commentary includes fresh translations of the Old and New Testament texts, shaped by Gafney&amp;#x2019;s commitment to the use of language that 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984644"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>A Women’s Lectionary for the Whole Church, Year B by Wilda C. Gafney (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>A Women’s Lectionary for the Whole Church, Year B by Wilda C. Gafney (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>4909</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984645">
  <title>After Method: Queer Grace, Conceptual Design, and the Possibility of Theology by Hanna Reichel (review)</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984645</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    A self-justifying current runs through modern Christian theology. Its quest through modernity has been to save itself from academic unintelligibility, metaphysical impossibility,  and compromised morality. Methodology has proven the favoured rock upon which theologians have (in all seeming wisdom) chosen to found their doctrinal edifices, confident in method&amp;#x2019;s ability to protect theology from crashing intellectual, cultural, and political waves.To this strategy, Hanna Reichel utters a withering, &amp;#x201C;Nein.&amp;#x201D; Method, like all creatures, is shot through with sin. Method possesses no resources by which to rescue itself, theology, or those who cry to God for liberation. &amp;#x201C;Method cannot save&amp;#x201D; (passim).Working out that insight 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984645"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>After Method: Queer Grace, Conceptual Design, and the Possibility of Theology by Hanna Reichel (review)</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>After Method: Queer Grace, Conceptual Design, and the Possibility of Theology by Hanna Reichel (review)</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>7622</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984646">
  <title>Uncertainty, Flourishing, and Existential Psychotherapy: Referencing Muhammad Iqbal’s Model of Self</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984646</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    How we find ourselves in the world living, thinking, acting, or relating is marked also by a sense of uncertainty. The latter shares a meaning complex with that of unpredictability which, philosophically considered, may conceptually include or overlap with indeterminacy, randomness, irregularity, rupture, discontinuity, ambiguity, or inexactitude. Such terms are likely to occur in descriptions of expectations, event outcomes, or the behaviour of complex dynamic rule-governed systems. The human self is such a system comprising thoughts, behaviour, emotions, and even the imaginative and creative faculties. Although significantly influenced by social conditions at meso and macro levels impinging on mental health and 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984646"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Uncertainty, Flourishing, and Existential Psychotherapy: Referencing Muhammad Iqbal’s Model of Self</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Uncertainty, Flourishing, and Existential Psychotherapy: Referencing Muhammad Iqbal’s Model of Self</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>50602</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>

<item rdf:about="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647">
  <title>Editorial</title>
  <link>https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647</link>
  <description>
    &#x3C;p&#x3E;&#x3C;/p&#x3E;
    The Fall 2025 issue of the Toronto Journal of Theology has 6 articles and 13 book reviews. The articles are paired in one of three genres: Christian identity, scriptural analysis, and existential resources.The first two articles relate to land and identity; one asks about what it means to &amp;#x201C;do&amp;#x201D; liturgy&amp;#x2014;to practice Christian ritual, to ritualize&amp;#x2014;in Canada today. It answers by drawing on Cathrine Bell&amp;#x2019;s theory of ritual and practice and Cl&amp;#xE1;udio Carvalhaes&amp;#x2019;s concept of lex naturae. The other article focuses on the interplay among community, choice, and authenticity in an age shaped by individualism. It argues that identity formation is true communal participation, drawing on Charles Taylor&amp;#x2019;s framework of secularity and 
    ... &#x3C;a href="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"&#x3E;Read More&#x3C;/a&#x3E;
  </description>

  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->
  <ag:source>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</ag:source>
  <ag:sourceURL>https://muse.jhu.edu/</ag:sourceURL>
  <ag:timestamp>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</ag:timestamp>
  <!-- AGGREGATOR -->

  <!-- ANNOTATE -->
  <annotate:reference rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647"/>
  <!-- ANNOTATE -->

  <!-- GOOGLE -->
  <g:image_link>https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/527/image/coversmall</g:image_link>
  <g:news_source>Editorial</g:news_source>
  <g:publish_date>2026-03-01</g:publish_date>
  <!-- GOOGLE -->

  <!-- DUBLIN -->
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
  <dc:publisher></dc:publisher>
  <dc:title>Editorial</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier rdf:resource="https://muse.jhu.edu/article/984647" />
  
  <dcterms:issued>2026-03-01</dcterms:issued>
  <dcterms:created>2026</dcterms:created>
  <!-- DUBLIN -->

  <!-- PRISM -->
  <prism:complianceProfile>TWO</prism:complianceProfile>
  <prism:distributor>Project MUSE&#x00AE;</prism:distributor>
  <prism:byteCount>4144</prism:byteCount>
  <prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12T00:00:00-05:00</prism:publicationDate>
  <prism:coverDate>2026-03-01</prism:coverDate>
  <!-- PRISM -->
</item>


</rdf:RDF>
