Cases in Bioethics: Health Research Ethics in Southeast Asia
Key Words

research involving pregnant women, vulnerable population, consent, posttrial obligations, HPV screening study, field trial, 27-weeks pregnant women

Cancer-causing infections, such as hepatitis and human papillomavirus (HPV), are responsible for approximately 30% of cancer cases in low- and lower-middle-income countries.1 The World Health Organization’s (WHO) cervical cancer elimination goal in 2020 aims to achieve 70% global screening coverage using high-performance tests by 2030.2 HPV “self-sampling,” a lower vaginal swab that detects viral DNA, is recommended by the WHO to replace the traditional Pap smear, which can present barriers for both patients and providers and is considerably less sensitive.3,4,5 Self-sampling can be performed by women at home and can identify both cancer-causing strains of HPV (HPV16 and HPV18). Studies have shown that women are more likely to use HPV self-sampling than to see a health care provider for cervical cancer screening.

A researcher in one country in Southeast Asia is interested in exploring ways to create awareness about HPV infection and increase adoption of HPV self-sampling among women. The researcher collaborated with other clinicians from both public and private health care facilities to conduct the first-ever study within this country. They aim to learn about the acceptability of HPV self-sampling among pregnant women as well as the association between HPV and pregnancy outcomes. Positive results would provide supportive evidence for HPV self-sampling to be incorporated into regular antenatal visits and increase screening overall. The research team proposed to recruit pregnant women who attend clinics regularly during pregnancy.

The researchers aimed to recruit 1,500 pregnant women from public and private health care facilities. Women eligible to participate were 30 years or older and at least 27 weeks into pregnancy, based on the fact that although women in this age group may have fewer HPV infections, exposure to high-risk HPV strains raises their risk of cervical cancer.6 In addition, pregnancy is said to be comparatively safer when women enter the second trimester.7 The research protocol was submitted to a local research ethics committee (REC) for review.

The study included a pretest questionnaire that contained some sensitive questions about sexual health, such as age of having first vaginal sex with men and the number of sexual partners. Research participants were provided with both verbal and written instructions on how to self-collect vaginal samples in the public washroom of a health facility. A posttest questionnaire gauged acceptance of performing the test during pregnancy. Participants were informed about their HPV results via their telecommunication of choice. Those who tested HPV-positive were informed and referred to a colposcopy clinic within 6-12 weeks after childbirth for further management. The researchers chose this time frame because revealing a positive HPV test to a woman who is pregnant may create unnecessary stress and anxiety about getting cancer that could jeopardize the pregnancy.

Questions

  1. Did the researchers have enough justification to include pregnant women in the research? What ethical issues may arise with research involving pregnant women? What extra layers of protection might be appropriate when including pregnant women in research?

  2. Would it be necessary to also obtain consent from the father of the expected child for this research study? Why or why not?

  3. When is it appropriate to disclose the HPV self-testing results to research participants—right away or after childbirth? Justify your answer.

  4. Does diagnosing HPV during the research suggest any obligation for the researcher to provide poststudy care and follow-up for that condition? Why or why not?

References

Akinlotan, Marvellous, Jane N. Bolin, Janet Helduser, Chinedum Ojinnaka, Anna Lichorad, and David McClellan. “Cervical Cancer Screening Barriers and Risk Factor Knowledge among Uninsured Women.” Journal of Community Health 42, no. 4 (February 2, 2017): 770–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-017-0316-9.
Chua, Brandon, Viva Ma, Caitlin Asjes, Ashley Lim, Mahsa Mohseni, and Hwee Lin Wee. “Barriers to and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women in Southeast Asia: a Systematic Review.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 9 (April 26, 2021): 4586. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094586.
Rebolj, Matejka, Jesper Bonde, Sarah Preisler, Ditte Ejegod, Carsten Rygaard, and Elsebeth Lynge. “Human Papillomavirus Assays and Cytology in Primary Cervical Screening of Women Aged 30 Years and Above.” Edited by Daniela Flavia Hozbor. PLOS ONE 11, no. 1 (January 20, 2016): e0147326. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147326.
UCSF Health. “Pregnancy.” UCSF Health. 2002. https://www.ucsfhealth.org/conditions/pregnancy.
Wikström, I., M. Lindell, K. Sanner, and E. Wilander. “Self-Sampling and HPV Testing or Ordinary Pap-Smear in Women Not Regularly Attending Screening: a Randomised Study.” British Journal of Cancer 105, no. 3 (July 2011): 337–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.236.
World Health Organization. “Cervical Cancer.” World Health Organization. November 17, 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cervical-cancer#:~:text=HPV%20is%20the%20most%20common.
World Health Organization. “Global Strategy to Accelerate the Elimination of Cervical Cancer as a Public Health Problem.” World Health Organization. November 17, 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240014107.

CC-BY-NC-ND

Share