consent, assent, vulnerability, dentistry, cerebral palsy, study design, randomized control trial, children, control groups
Cerebral palsy is a neurological condition defined by muscle control problems that occur either during pregnancy or right before or after birth.1 Globally, the condition affects 2 of every 1,000 births and is more common in males. Cerebral palsy is classified depending on severity of disability and the nature of motor symptoms (spastic, dyskinetic, or ataxic). Individuals with cerebral palsy are more likely to experience various oral health problems related to molar eruption, tooth alignment, dental trauma, and bruxism.2
Bruxism is a condition characterized by persistent jaw-muscle action such as teeth clenching or grinding and mandible bracing or thrusting. It appears in two separate circadian patterns: sleep bruxism and awake bruxism.3 Tooth grinding and gnashing can cause muscle hypertrophy of the lower jaw, migraines, temporomandibular dysfunction, and tooth abrasion.4,5 Research estimates that between one-fourth and two-thirds of children with cerebral palsy have bruxism.6 According to a systematic review of the research literature, a dental appliance called an occlusal splint can help mitigate the effects of bruxism.7
A research team recruited children aged 7 to 16 years diagnosed with cerebral palsy with bruxism for a study to test the effectiveness of occlusal splints on bruxism and randomized the participants into an intervention group and a control group. The intervention group was subdivided into two groups, in which one received a soft (silicone) occlusal splint and the other received a hard (acrylic) occlusal splint. The control group did not receive an occlusal splint but were encouraged by parents to be aware of and stop grinding and perform jaw exercises.
After obtaining parental permission/consent, participants were assigned to one of the three study groups and evaluated for management of dental erosion and attrition. Participants were monitored monthly, during which they also received oral hygiene education and standard oral care (including teeth cleaning and restorative treatment as necessary). The researchers observed occlusal splint wear and tear by taking photographs of the device.
Questions
Should the researchers be expected to obtain not only permission from parents/guardians, but also assent from children? What, if any, additional information might be relevant to answering this question?
What do you think about the choice to randomize children to the different study groups? What do the researchers need to demonstrate in order to justify random assignment to each of the three study arms? Would a different study design have been more appropriate?
Do you have any other ethical concerns related to this study? How might they be resolved?