-
Why Rural Verse1. A review of Spring Thunder and Other Poems by Mark Van Doren
- Johns Hopkins University Press
- document
- Additional Information
New York: Thomas Seltzer, 1924. Pp. 69.
Racial migrations and the economic conditions of modern life have had one consequence which, among so many others, has been neglected. The universal and rapid growth of the reading public has produced a variety of cultures existing side by side in the same village, in the same street, exhibiting differences even between members of the same family. How much more difficult to establish principles of literary criticism than in the eighteenth century, when there still existed a certain unity of the educated classes both in town and country, in England and America! Now we are divided by space, by taste, by faction; and here in England, in London, different groups of poets are almost unintelligible to each other.
One of the points of division is that between urban and rural poetry. I myself – to make a personal confession – have never criticized, because I never understood, a well-known type of contemporary poetry which is occupied almost exclusively with the English countryside.
Moreover, literature has – partly for economic reasons, i.e., the necessity for grinding journalistic axes – tended to concentrate its activities in a few international capitals. There it becomes occupied chiefly with metropolitan emotions and sensations. And the metropolitan public, composed of various races and various social origins, has in common only these metropolitan feelings and emotions. Here too the
I have no solution to offer for the problems of modern life. But, while we wait, I know that it is a good thing that rural verse should be written. We
Mr. Van Doren’s verse is well written. (I question only his use of “intervene” as a transitive verb on page 61.)