publisher colophon


Resettled communities are ancient in human history. The Babylo­nian Captivity, the Romans’ establishment of colonies in con­quered territories, and the more recent establishment of reserva­tions for Native Americans are three well-known examples of this time-honored practice. Despite the antiquity and ubiquitousness of resettlement, Exiles and Migrants in Oceania is, to my knowl­edge, the first attempt by anthropologists to confront the practice in a comparative effort. The comparative study of resettled com­munities was initiated largely through the thinking, planning, and coordination of Homer G. Barnett, to whom this volume is dedi­cated. The volume is, if anything, a first fruit of Barnett’s vision and labor.

Like the other volumes of the ASAO Monograph Series, this is a symposium volume. With but two exceptions, the authors of the papers included here met at the University of Washington in 1970 to determine, through presentations and discussion, the significant issues raised by the study of resettled communities. On the basis of these discussions, papers circulated before the symposium con­vened were rewritten so that each essay addressed the same issues. It was this sort of comparison that Barnett envisioned when he es­tablished the Pacific Displaced Communities Project. This volume is, hopefully, a first step toward that end. xii

Chapters 1 and 12 discuss the theoretical and comparative is­sues inherent in the study of resettled communities. They are con­cerned mainly with the generalizations that can be made from comparing resettled communities and with how these generaliza­tions fit with the larger body of anthropological knowledge. Chap­ters 2 to 11 present data on specific resettled communities in Oceania. Although each of these chapters concentrates primarily on a particular resettled community (often in comparison with the home island), its comparative focus can be seen in the presentation of the data.

I gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Martin G. Silver­man to the organization and success of the symposium that result­ed in this volume. I also wish to emphasize the contributions of Murray Chapman and David Schneider. The direction which the symposium and the volume took was profoundly shaped by Chap­man’s masterful exposition of the relation between local social units and the larger social systems that are their contexts. David Schneider’s penetrating discussions of the shape that culture must inevitably give to the way a community regards its situation was equally determinative of the theoretical and substantive direction of the volume. My special thanks go to Sally Furecz and Emily Friedman for their editorial assistance in preparing the manu­script. Vern Carroll, the past editor, and Mac Marshall, the pres­ent editor of the ASAO Monograph Series, provided continual en­couragement and advice during the long period of editing and reediting that followed the symposium.

In addition to his other considerable contributions to the sym­posium and this volume, Murray Chapman also directed the prep­arations of the maps for this volume. To Robert Campbell, the cartographer of these maps, goes my very special gratitude. His careful reading of the manuscript and preparation of maps on the basis of the often dense anthropological prose he had to read was, in my estimation, a marvel. He contributed his time and talent with patience, understanding, and consummate professionalism.

Finally, I wish to acknowledge the generosity of the National In­stitute of Mental Health for supporting the symposium and much of the costs of preparing the volume (PHS 1 R13 MH18376–01). I also wish to thank the University of Washington for support of the symposium and for a stipend that allowed me to organize this volume during the summer of 1971.

Additional Information

MARC Record
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Creative Commons
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.