-
Foreword
- ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
- Chapter
- Additional Information
Foreword I thank the Director of the Institute of SoutheastAsian Studies(ISEAS),AmbassadorK.Kesavapany,forinviting metocontributetheForewordtothisvolumewhich containsthepaperssubmittedtothesymposium“Revisiting the Singapore Women’s Charter”. The symposium was organizedbyDrTheresaW.Devasahayam,thecoordinator ofthegenderstudiesprogrammeatISEAS. First,IamverypleasedthatISEAShasaprogramme on gender policies and issues in SoutheastAsia. I consider the emancipation of women and the recognition thatwomenareentitledtoequalrightswithmenasone of the greatest achievements of the twentieth century. The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of DiscriminationAgainstWomen (CEDAW), of which Singaporeisaparty,isoneofthemostimportanttreaties in public international law. It seeks to put an end to a shameful period in human history, lasting thousands of years, during which women were treated as chattels and having no rights or as inferior human beings and discriminatedagainstinamyriadofways.Itis,ofcourse, true that CEDAW has not been fully implemented by all the state parties or by all the member states of the UN. However, those who invoke culture or religion to justify discrimination against women know that theirs isalosingbattle.Theyareonthewrongsideofhistory. 00aSWCPrelims.indd9 1/28/112:10:30PM Iamconvincedthatoneday,inthiscentury,thedream thatwomenwillenjoythesamerightsasmenwillcome trueforallwomenkind. Second,inSingaporetheenactmentoftheWomen’s Charterin1961wasarevolutionaryact.Itputanendto polygamyforallSingaporeans,exceptforMuslims.Section 46oftheCharter,interalia,givesthewifetherightto usehersurnameandname;tohaveequalrightswithher husbandinrunningthematrimonialhousehold;andthe righttoengageinanytradeorprofessionorsocialactivities. Compared to the situation prior to 1961, these were transformativepropositions.AmemberoftheSingapore Legislative Assembly was right when he described the Women’sCharterasabillofrightsforSingaporewomen. ThereisadisagreementinthisbookbetweenDrKanwaljit SoinandProfessorLeongWaiKumonwhetherthetitle ofthelegislation,“Women’sCharter”,shouldberetained or changed to “Family Charter”. I agree with Professor Leong that, for historical reasons, it is better to retain thename.Iagreewithherthatitwouldbeunfortunate iffuturegenerationsofSingaporeans,especiallywomen, weretoforgetthestrugglesofwomenovermanydecades whicheventuallyledtotheenactmentofthislandmark legislation. Third,Iamdisappointedtolearnfromthebookthat divorcehasbeenontheriselookingatmarriagetrends inthepastdecadeandmore.TheMinistryofCommunity Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS) has been campaigningtoencourageyoungSingaporeanstomarry andtohavechildren.IthinkMCYSshouldalsofocuson whysuchahighpercentageofourmarriagesbreakdown x Foreword 00aSWCPrelims.indd10 1/28/112:10:30PM [3.141.41.187] Project MUSE (2024-04-24 11:00 GMT) and,whether,whenchildrenareinvolved,thereisanything whichourcounsellorscandotopreventthedissolution ofsuchmarriages.Iamalsoappalledtoreadaccountsof theshabbytreatmentgiventochildreninfamilieswhich havebrokendownbecauseofdomesticviolence.Ifthe fatherisviolentandharmshisfamily,whyshouldthelaw requirethevictimizedchildtoundergocounselling?There isobviouslyalsoaneedtore-thinktheexistinglawand practiceregardingthetreatmentofanerringhusbandwho refusestopaymaintenance.Whyisthereahesitationto applytothecourttoimposeattachment?Thelawshould alsobeamendedtoallowamemberofthevictim’sfamily toapplytocourtforaprotectiveorder.Thevictimmay betoofearfulortraumatizedtodoso. Conclusion Singapore has come a long way since the Women’s Charter came into force in 1962.Women have attained equalitywithmenineducationatalllevels.Womenhave also achieved equality with men in employment. Some discriminatorypractices,suchasthequotaonwomenin themedicalschool,havebeensweptaway.However,the discriminationagainstfemalecivilservants,regardingthe entitlement...