-
5. Islamist Lawyers' Views
- ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
- Chapter
- Additional Information
74 5 ISLAMISTLAWYERS’VIEWS I concentrate in this chapter on the views of some Islamist lawyers on thepoliticalandlegalframeworkofMalaysia.Ipresentfirsttheviewsof Mohamed Ariff Yusof and Haji Sulaiman Abdullah. Their views relate moretopoliticalandethnicinterrelationsandtherightfulplaceofIslam inMalaysia.Thesecondhalfofthischapterconcernsthemorenarrowly legalargumentspromulgatedbythelateprofessoroflawinSingaporeand Malaysia,AhmadIbrahim.AlthoughheadmitstheConstitutiontobesecular, hedevelopsasophisticated(andarguablyconstitutionallysound)argument bywhichIslamiclawcouldbegivenprimacyovertheConstitutionandall otherlawsinMalaysia.Theviews,arguments,andsentimentsexaminedin hereareofthekindthatactivistsmustaddressintheirdefenceoffreedom ofreligioninMalaysia.BeforemovingoninChapter6toadescriptionof one civil society initiative instigated to mount such a defence, I examine Salbiah Ahmad’s response to some of the arguments of Ahmad Ibrahim. Shepointsouttheimportantlimitationsofwhollylegalchallenges. THEVIEWSOFMOHAMEDARIFFYUSOFAND HAJISULAIMANABDULLAH OnThursday23 September2004,IattendedinKualaLumpuraHarvard Club colloquium titled “IslamToday:Themes and Issues”. I understood that many of those in attendance were Harvard graduates, while others 74 06 I&AM.indd 74 4/22/10 9:34:47 AM IslamistLawyers’Views 75 hadreceivedinvitations.Ibelongedtothelattergroup.Thetwospeakers for the evening were both members of the Malaysian Bar and advocates for the replacement of civil law with Syariah law.They both spoke with apparent candour and shared their views and opinions on current trends pertainingtoIslampolitically,socially,andlegally. MohamedAriffYusof The first speaker at the colloquium, Mohamed, was keen to stress to his largelynon-MuslimaudiencethatIslam’simageasareligionofterrorism didnotreflectIslamasitreallywas.NoMuslimwouldcondonetheattacks ontheTwinTowersinNewYorknoranyattacksoninnocentpeople.He deplored the biased portrayal of Islam in the American media which he describedasfulloffearandhateandheassuredhisaudiencethat“thereis nothingtofearfromIslam”.Heaskedhisaudiencetokeepanopenmindto theideascomingfromwhathedescribedasthe“Islamistmovement”. Mohamed complained that, owing to outcry from non-Muslims in Malaysia,Islamistswerenotbeinggiventheopportunitytodiscussissues suchasMalaysiaasanIslamicstate,Hududlaws,orapostasy.Heclaimed MalaysiawasnotstraightforwardlysecularbecauseIslamasthereligionof thefederationasstatedinArticle3mustberegardedashavingramifications. JudgesovertheyearshaverecognizedtheimportantplacethatIslamhasin Malaysia.Hecitedadecisionwhichdeemeditunconstitutionaltoprohibit male students from wearing the Muslim turban. “True, the Constitution as it stands is a secular Constitution. But adjustments were made in the processofConstitutionmaking.WhentheReidCommissionfirstdrafted theConstitutiontheyomittedallreferencetoIslam.”Itwasbecauseofthe protestsoftheSultansandoppositionpartiesthatIslamisthereligionof thefederation“andtherepercussionsarestillfelttoday”. Mohamedwentontosay, We’ve always argued as part of the Islamic movement that it is part of thefreedomofreligionprovisionintheConstitutionthatmuftisshould be allowed to articulate [their views] and if they get command of the majorityofsupportthroughdemocraticmeans,toimplementwhatthey arearguingforasMuslims. Later,inresponsetoaquestion,hewentontosaythatMuslimsrefer to Islam as “adeen, as a way of life”, and that to live as Muslims do in othercountrieswheretheyareminoritiesisunacceptableinMalaysiawhere Muslims are a sizeable majority. “It is simply unIslamic. … To a lot of 06 I&AM.indd 75 4/22/10 9:34:47 AM [3.147.66.178] Project MUSE (2024-04-25 10:31 GMT) 76 IslamizationandActivisminMalaysia Muslimsthiscannotbethecase.Wecannotbesubjectedtoanoverriding civilcourtjurisdiction,particularlyinMalaysia.” HajiSulaimanAbdullah The second speaker was Sulaiman who represented the counsel for the MajlisAgamaIslamWilayahPersekutuaninLinaJoy’sappeal(seeChapter 4).Hebeganbypointing...