Animals as Neighbors: The Past and Present of Commensal Animals

Notes

135 notes inTroDUCTion 1. see Juliet Clutton-brock 1999 and 2012. 2. see honeycutt 2010 for a useful summary of current genetic evidence. 3. shipman 2011. 4. For example, Anderson 1989 details the human contribution to the extinction of moas in new Zealand. sodikoff 2009 provides a series of thoughtful essays on different aspects of extinction. 5. For example, in Thompson 1989. 6. boucher et al. 1982 give an excellent overview of this topic. see also De mazancourt et al. 2004; Dickman 1992. 7. garcía et al. 2010. 8. boucher et al. 1982. 9. Alberti et al. 2008, 150. 10. mcKinney 2006. 11. Johnston 2001. 12. mcKinney 2006. 13. o’Connor 2010a. 14. o’Connor 1997; russell 2002; Zeder 2006; Driscoll et al. 2009. 15. gentry et al. 2004. 16. o’Connor 1997; budiansky 1992; see also discussion of domestication in Cassidy and mullin 2007. 17. Driscoll et al. 2009 and Trut et al. 2009 give somewhat differing views on the relationship between “tame” and “domestic.” see also réale et al. 2007 on the heritability and evolutionary significance of “tameness.” 18. Kajiura et al. 2009. 19. Andrezjewski et al. 1978; luniak 2004. 20. smith and Kenward 2011 discuss this adaptation in the context of roman britain; see also ezequiel et al. 2001 for a very different context. 21. bleed 2006; o’Connor 2000a. 22. bonanni et al. 2007. 23. For example, urban gulls; indykiewciz 2005. 24. banks et al. 2010. 25. For example, the annual “garden bird survey” run in the UK, or widespread sales of “garden bird” food. Advertising for the latter and the iconography of both make clear that the category includes small, attractive, mainly seed- or invertebrate-eating species, not hawks or nest-robbing crows. 26. ingold, in manning and serpell 1994. 27. Conard 2003. 28. Arnold et al. 2006; miller 2008; marzluff et al. 2008. 29. This is discussed at greater length in chapter 8 of this volume. 136| Notes to Chapter 2 ChAPTer 1. The hUmAn enVironmenT 1. Crutzen 2002; steffen et al. 2007. 2. Crutzen 2002. 3. ruddiman 2007; ellis 2011. 4. Wilson 2007. 5. Jones et al. 1994; Wright and Jones 2006. 6. Arnold et al. 2006; gilbert 1991; shochat et al. 2006. 7. o’Connor 2011. 8. This is discussed further in o’Connor and evans 2005. 9. niemelä 1999; rebele 1994. 10. o’Connor 2010b. 11. roxburgh et al. 2004; svensson et al. 2007; graham and Duda 2011. 12. irwin et al. 2006; ruiz et al. 2007. 13. smout 2003; mcKinney 2006; long 1981 and 2003; Flannery and White 1991. 14. sykes 2004 and 2010. 15. Jerolmack 2008. Central to this paper is the questionable assertion that “modernity posits a firm boundary between nature and culture.” 16. biotic homogenization—mcKinney 2006. 17. rathje and murphy 1992; rathje et al. 1992. 18. evans 2010. 19. o’Connor 2000b further explores this topic. 20. For example, the stinging nettle Urtica dioica; Taylor 2009. 21. hutchinson 1978; o’Connor and evans 2005, 28–29. 22. Polis and strong 1996 give an excellent discussion of food-web dynamics. 23. Fahrig and rytwinski 2009; benítez-lópez et al. 2010; osłowksi 2008; Kociolek et al. 2010. 24. This contentious issue is usefully summarized by Douglas and sadler 2011. 25. Arnold et al. 2006. 26. originally used by le Corbusier (Charles-edouard Jeanneret) in his 1924 Vers un architecture (Paris: g. Crès), and reiterated ever since. 27. rubble sites; the classic studies of urban rubble sites are those undertaken by owen gilbert 1991 in sheffield, UK. see also sukopp 2008. 28. Pigeons as a problem—a recent, concise account is given by haag-Wackernagel and geigenfand 2008. 29. A useful summary is given by lundholm and richardson 2010. 30. soldatini et al. 2008. ChAPTer 2. soUrCes oF eViDenCe 1. This huge topic is summarized by Curthoys and Docker 2010; isacoff 2005 discusses a specific case study. 2. A fine example of combining sources is given by boivin et al. 2009. 3. Potts 1967. 4. Clergeau and Quenot 2007. 5. mcClure 2011. Notes to Chapter 3| 137 6. Though as he is now developing an interest in “greening” cities, all is not lost. 7. gehrt 2007; gehrt et al. 2011. 8. murton et al. 1972b. 9. haag-Wackernagel 2006; haag-Wackernagel and moch 2004. 10. Jacquin et al. 2010. 11. Taphonomy is dealt with at length and in detail in sources...