Anderson, J., 35 anointing, 11 appropriateness, 48, 71 Arfken, M., 14 Ashworth, P., ix Austin, W. J., xv, 51 Ayto, J., 73n4 Bales, A., 19 Barlow, J., 43 Barrell, J., 49–50 being lost, 40–42 Berndtsson, I., ix, 51 Berger, P. L., 17 Black, M., 30, 70 Bollnow, O. F., 7 bracketing, xv, xvi, 9, 23–24, 27, 55–56, 58, 68; interview, xv, 13–16, 25, 31–32, 52, 67; mentioned in the final report, 49; while thematizing, 34 Brentano, F., ix, 3 Briscoe, D., 22 Buber, M., ix, 1 Claesson, S., ix, 51 closing off, 55–56 co-constitution, 3, 6, 41–42, 71 coherent paragraph, 38–39 Colaizzi, P. F., ix conclusive, 67; conclusively, 49 confidentiality, 22–23, 26, 32, 36, 57, 61–65, 67 consciousness, 1–4, 6, 69; pre-reflective, 2–3, 7, 71, 73n5; reflective, 2–3, 7, 71 consensus (of the interpretive group), 29, 36–38, 40, 52, 67, 69 Dahlberg, K., ix, 56 Dahlberg, H., ix Dapkus, M., 7, 73n1 Davis, M. A., 11 deafness as difference, 57–58 Dias-Bowie, Y., 11 Droppleman, P., 12 Duquesne University, xiv, 51 empirical, ix, xiv, xvii, 1, 7, 10, 15, 25, 34, 47–48, 52, 58, 67 experience, direct, 2–3, 7, 14; indirect, 2–3, 7; field of, 5–6; four classic grounds of, 35, 68 existential, 1, 38, 56, 68 existential-hermeneutic-phenomenology, x, 1, 15, 20, 68, 71; and pedagogy, 55; limited flexibility, 47, 51–52 figurative language, 30–31, 43–46; 52, 54–55, 74n13 figure/ground, 4–7, 33, 35, 37, 39, 68; metaphor as a kind of, 30 Fine, H. J., 43 Fischer, C. T., 51 freedom, 6, 26, 47, 55, 71 Friberg, F. ix, 51 fusion of horizons, 27 Gadamer, H., ix, 1, 25, 27–28, 69 Gallese, V., 57 Gearing, R. E., 16, 73n4 Gestalt, 4–5, 33, 37, 41, 68 Giorgi, A., ix, xv Golledge, C., 10 Goodrich, L., 22, 53, 57–58 Graves, T. R., 14, 16 Greenberg, K., 11 Groopman, J., 55 Halling, S., 14, 38, 56, 73n3 Hawthorne, M., 15, 23, 56 Heaps, C., 35 Heidegger, M., ix, 1, 71, 74n14 Hein, S. F., xv, 51 Henley, T., xiii, 3–4, 12–14, 24, 35, 50, 73n2 Index 86 Index hermeneutic, 1, 9–10, 12, 25–32, 52, 68–69; circle, 26, 28, 69; hermeneutics of restoration , 29 Hood, R.W., 11, 29 Husserl, E., ix, 1, 3, 6, 71 hypotheses, 12, 15, 52–53 Ihde, D., 15, 74n16 illuminating, 25, 36, 69, 71 informed consent, 21, 61, 69–70, 73n7 institutional or internal review board (IRB), 12–13, 21–22, 57, 69, 73n7 intentionality, 3, 42, 69 interpretive group, 26, 36–37, 42, 46, 50, 69; interpretive team, xvi, 26, 30–32, 34, 40, 43, 53, 59, 63, 67–68 interviewer, as appreciative perceiver, 18, 73n9; as pragmatic actor, 20–21, 24 Josselson, R., 29 Katz, D., 3 King, M., 38 Klukken, G., 11 Lebenswelt, 6 Levasseur, P., 35 life-world, 6–7, 70 literature review, 47–48, 52–53 Locander, W. B., 20 Luckmann, T., 17 MacGillivray, W., 20 Merleau-Ponty, M., ix, xiv, xvi, 6, 59, 74n14, 71 metaphor, xiv, 30–31, 42–44, 53, 70, 74 Necker cube, 40, 42 Nyström, M., ix Öhlén, J., ix, 51 Oye, K., 30, 74n12 participant-as-expert, 17–18 phenomenology, x, 1, 10–11, 48, 57–58, 70 plausibility, 36, 38, 48; plausible, 36, 71 Polkinghorne, D. E., 14 Pollio, H. R., x, xiii, xv, 3–4, 10–14, 20, 22, 24, 35, 38–39, 43, 46, 50, 53,73n10 Pollio, M. R., 43 primer, 1, 50, 71 question, final, 18, 20; follow-up, 9, 18–19; leading, 18–19, 67, 69 Reitz, R. R., 59 Ricoeur, P., ix, 1, 28–29, 69, 73n4 rigor, xiv, 25, 48, 71; rigorous, xiv–xvi, 13, 25, 30, 50 Sartre, J.-P., ix, 1, 6, 68 saturation point, 12, 52, 71 Schwandt, T. A., 3, 7 serpent handling, 11, 38–39 situated perspective, 4, 71 Smucker, C., 12 Snellen, A., 30–31, 44–46 snowball tactic, 12 spiral, false, 2–3, 6 thematic structure, xv, xvi, 33–34, 37–43, 47, 49–50, 52, 69, 71 themes, 33–38, 47, 49, 54, 56, 69, 71; bipolar , 35; unipolar, 35; meta-themes, 47, 71 Thomas, S. P., xv, 11–12, 22, 35, 46, 73n2, 73n10 Thompson, Craig, xiii, 3–4, 11–14, 20, 24, 35, 50, 73n2 Thompson, Charles, 11 Thweatt, M...