publisher colophon
  • October 1878

At the beginning of October, negotiations intensified between Grosvenor Lowrey and potential investors in Edison’s lighting experiments. They soon reached an agreement and on 16 October the Edison Electric Light Company was incorporated with a capital stock of $300,000. Most of the investors in the new company were affiliated with Western Union or with Drexel, Morgan & Company. 1 Lowrey was also negotiating with Drexel Morgan regarding foreign rights to Edison’s electric light, though these negotiations were complicated by Edison’s relations with Theodore Puskas and George Gouraud.

As news of Edison’s electric light experiments spread, it produced a panic that caused the price of gas company shares to drop in New York and London. The London publishers Sampson Low, Marston & Company also approached Edison about producing a pamphlet on his electric light. And at the end of the month, the Rothschild family expressed an interest in foreign rights through their American agent, August Belmont.2

Assured of ample funds for his lighting experiments, Edison purchased an eighty-horsepower steam engine and began construction of a substantial brick machine shop and engine house and a two-story brick office.3 These new shop facilities would allow him to build dynamos as well as lamps; his machinists were already working on a turning-fork generator based on his 1876 motor design. Increasingly concerned that existing generators might prove unsuitable for his system, he began to investigate their design and to study the problems involved in regulating dynamos and line loads. To aid in this Page 537 research he acquired one of Edward Weston’s generators and a second, larger machine from William Wallace.

Edison continued his experiments with lamps, and on 25 October he filed two caveats incorporating designs from one of his September draft caveats and from three earlier October drafts.4 Besides regulator designs, his lamp experiments included investigations of alternative shapes and materials for his burners and the use of protective coatings on them. Edison considered his approach distinct from those of other inventors, and, in late October, he became infuriated when the directors of the Light Company expressed concern over William Sawyer’s and Albon Man’s claim that their lamp patents gave them priority over his designs.5

While most of the laboratory staff focused on the lamp research, Charley Edison continued to experiment on the electromotograph telephone receiver, with occasional assistance from Charles Batchelor. In early October, Charley designed several wall brackets for these telephones, including some that took advantage of the electromotograph’s loud-speaking quality by using a horn instead of listening tubes. He also developed a standard electromotograph button consisting of chalk, acetate mercury, and a saturated solution of caustic soda and began extensive experiments to arrive at the best amounts of each to use.6 Edison hoped that this receiver would enable him to get around Bell’s patent, which became increasingly important when the Bell Company in London secured an injunction against James Adams and the manufacturers making Edison telephones there. 7

Another project briefly occupied Edison’s attention during the second week of October, when he and Batchelor turned to the design of a new dictating machine. Although sales of exhibition machines rose in October, the Edison Speaking Phonograph Company was concerned that the demand for these “cannot be expected to last many months longer,”8 and urged their replacement by a standard commercial machine. One of the new dictating phonographs was apparently built and Edison applied for a patent on the design in March 1879, but he made no effort to develop it into a commercial instrument.

Frustrated by a similar lack of progress in developing a commercial toy phonograph, Charles Harris dissolved his partnership with Oliver Russell in mid-October. Hilborne Roosevelt agreed to replace him as a party to the toy phonograph contract with Edison. Page 538

Other matters occasionally drew Edison’s attention away from the light. In early October, Howard Schuyler, a San Francisco civil engineer, addressed an electric-pen circular to western mining companies requesting that they send Edison information about temperatures and ventilation in their mines so that he could develop a method of reducing temperature and humidity. However, nothing seems to have come of this.

Older concerns demanded Edison’s attention as well. George Bliss continued to press him for assistance in combatting infringers of the electric pen. E. Baker Welch, who had supported Edison’s multiple telegraph experiments in 186869, renewed his claims to the quadruplex, and Edison asked Lowrey to deal with this in his capacity as Western Union attorney. Finally, Edison returned briefly to the microphone controversy by presenting his case in a long letter to William Barrett, physics professor at the Royal Dublin School of Science, who had begun to champion his inventions in Britain.

During October, Edison hired several new workmen. John Ott, who had been working for the toy phonograph investors at Menlo Park, now joined Edison’s staff as a full-time machinist. Other new machinists included Charles Dean, who had worked in Edison’s Newark shops, Rudolph Hense, and Charles Moffat.9 H. A. (Alex) Campbell began as a carpenter working on the new buildings and then did other carpentry work around the laboratory.10 F. Cornish was a handyman, as was Joseph Freeman, who worked briefly at the beginning of October.11 It may have been at this time that Edison considered setting up a boarding house for his staff. Sarah Jordan, one of Mary Edison’s relatives (she was Mary’s father’s stepdaughter from his first marriage), who was visiting Menlo Park in October, presumably to assist the family during Mary’s pregnancy, was running the boarding house on Christie Street by December.12

Mary gave birth to their second son, William, on Saturday, 26 October. Just prior to the birth doctors were called in to attend not only to Mary, who was having a difficult time, but also Edison, who had developed a case of facial neuralgia after having a severe cold earlier in the week.

1. Doc. 1494 n. 4.

2. See Doc. 1566.

3. Doc. 1500 nn. 1–2.

4. See Docs. 1456, 1472, 1485, and 1503. Page 539

5. See Doc. 1542.

6. Doc. 1440 n. 7.

7. Doc. 1497 n. 2.

8. Doc. 1484.

9. On Dean see time sheets, DF (TAEM 17:735, 754); Cat. 30,108, Cat. 1210:156, Cat. 30,107, Cat. 30,105, Cat. 1218:122, PN-72-08-16, all Accts. (TAEM 20:188, 694; 21:2, 29, 243; 22:219); f°r Moffat and Hense see Doc. 1496 nn. 2–3.

10. Jehl 1937–41, 22–23, 373) tmle sheets, DF (TAEM 17:752, 756).

11. Time sheets, DF (TAEM 17:753, 763, 772, 728).

12. Edison asked her to come to Menlo Park in early October, possibly because of Mary’s advanced pregnancy. On 20 December, he opened an account book entry for her, presumably related to the boarding house. TAE to Sarah Jordan, 7 Oct. 1878 and Jordan to TAE, 11 Oct. 1878, both DF (TAEM 16:191, 225); Ledger #3:311, Accts. (TAEM 87:140); Stillwell family genealogy sent by Mrs. J. Ellsworth Doughty, 9 Mar. 1956, EBC; see also Braden 1983 and Jehl 1937–41, chap. 4.

  • Draft to George Bliss

Menlo Park, N.J., Oct 1st 1878a

Dear Sir

Your favor of the 25th ult relative to the Stock Co was duly rec’d— 1 My The [—]b Myc idea was to have a Co formed to take my small inventions, like the E pen and auriphoned &c, and find a market for them. I expect to turn out other inven tions of this kind and want to place them as soon as desire that should be very much pleased to have a Co should be formed that would market my these small inventions of minee whenf perfected I have enough of the larger ones to keep me busy. Of course the Co must be a responsible one

ADf, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:339). Letterhead of T. A. Edison. a“Menlo Park, N.J.,” and “187” preprinted. bThe [—]” interlined above. c”My” interlined below. dObscured overwritten letters, eDesire that a Co should be formed” interlined above; “should be very much pleased to have” interlined above that; “that would market nay small inventions of mine” interlined below that; obscured overwritten letters in “mine.” f Interlined above.

1. On 25 September, Bliss had sent Edison a circular for a proposed “Edison Merchandising Co.,” the basis of which would be the electric pen business. Bliss had asked Edison “to become one of the incorporators and a stock holder,” saying “I should like to have you a prominent official in the Co. or at any rate want the benefit [of] your name and influence.” In urging Edison’s participation, Bliss noted that the electric pen had been Edison’s “first venture outside of the telegraphic field and on this account it is desirable for you that [it] be a permanent success.” He also thought Edison would be “disposed out of personal friendship to me to help this matter along.” No company was formed. DF (TAEM 18:329, 332).

  • From Grosvenor Lowrey

New York, Oct ist 18781a

My dear Edison

I agree with you entirely as to Mr Twombly; & if he had not been at my office on my arrival, I should have been at his within a half-hour to lay my plan before him— As it was he agrees with me in everything except giving the Gas people an option— I explained that, I resorted to that merely as one means of putting some money in your pocket without taking it from our own subscribers, & asked if he would be willing to add that to the amount to be paid in so as to get for you the clear sum of $100,000 all cost of machinery experimenting &c to be paid out of the Company’s treasury— He answered very frankly & promptly that he would I believe now that he and I have a fair prospect working together to get you that sum; to provide an ample working capital, & to satisfy Mr Banker,2 & Edson before as tob these special points. I cannot now take the time to set them forth, but if you can receive a visit on Thursday or Friday from Mr Billings3 & two or three others I will have everything ready & will talk it all over— Please let me know what day to go over—

Give your whole mind to the light— I will see that not only do you get what you ought to have but that every reasonable expectation of those who have “spoken to you” is satisfied— I want Western Union people to have the best chance at this because both you & I know who we are dealing with; & my night reflection had determined me to call on Mr Twombly this morning— We are therefore quite in accord in this respect; & I welcome Mr Twombly’s co-operation, for I believe he will do as he said, he would (i.e) try to get you a suitable & worthy compensation instead of trying as is not unnaturally the usual custom, to get the lowest price which your modesty or your necessities might make possible—

I enclose a copy of a letter just written by me to him in response to a request for a copy of a project for a company &c which I showed him—

By the way, Mr Billings says that twenty five cents per light would give you a income exceeding Mr Stewarts— 4 I told him & Twombly that some fixed royalty would be a condition because you were thus assured of something definite, but the amount might properly be the subject of negotiation upon the basis of your getting $100,000 & of their getting their money back before the payment of any dividend— Page 541

You will note what I have said about their having one year before paying the second fifty thousand—

Keep your expectations moderate, notwithstanding this suggestion of large figures— Perhaps we may not get it all Truly

G. P. Lowrey

You will probably have to cure Edson’s & Banker’s disappointment by giving them (confidentially) in addition to what they subscribe for, $5000 of your free stock.

ENCLOSUREc

New York, Oct 1st 1878a

My Dear Mr Twombly:

I have been detained so long that I cannot now revise as I would wish, the memorandum which I read to you this morning and I therefore submit in this form the substantial part of a project for a company to own and use or license the use of Edisons electric light

First. I understand that all serious difficulties have been overcome and that there is every reason to believe that he has discovered the means of giving an electrical light suitable for every use at a vastly reduced cost as compared with the cost of gas.

He is willing to sell one half of this invention for $150 000, payable, say $50 000 upon the execution of a contract between him and a company to be formed; $50 000 at the end of say, one year provided the company then desires to go on, his patents to be all reassigned and his contracts cancelled in case they do not wish to go on; and $50 000 or so much as may be necessary to be disbursed by the company in experiments machinery &c requisite for completely perfecting all things connected with making the light.

Second. In order to accomplish the essential features of it, Mr Edison desires and I suggest as a feasible method that we organize a stock company with a capital stock of $300,000, $150 000 of which to be issued as full paid stock and reserved by Mr Edison; $150 000 to be subscribed for by parties acceptable to yourself and to me

Third. The board of directors to be chosen entirely by the subscribers to the cash subscription subject however to objections by you or by myself. The object of this reservation being as was expressed between us to day, to protect Mr Edison from the chance that persons interested in other means of lighting Page 542 might seek the control of such a company with a view to suppress rather than to develope this invention

Fourth = After the Company shall be in operation the first profits to be devoted to the repayment to cash subscribers of the amount paid in— After such repayment Mr Edison to have a fixed royalty per annum, per light, the amount of which I cannot even intelligently suggest now, although as you are aware Mr Edson and Mr Banker had in theird proposed contract with him fixed it at 25¢ per light per annum, and after the payment of that royalty the profits to be divided upon the stock as in every other case, (margin A.)e

(A) I assume that there can be no objection to a royalty fixed at a proper amount and payable to the inventor before making dividends, since, at that time, the subscribing stockholders will be the owners of one half these valuable inventions free of all cost. The patents to be conveyed by Mr. Edison are to cover all inventions by him, now made or to be made within five years, for the United States and Canada.

I think on the whole, I will wait until I can see you tomorrow and have the benefit of your reflection upon these points before reducing the matter to the form of a contract or prospectus. This may save me some little trouble, and be done beneficially.

I have said nothing about the matter which we so fully discussed—(ie) the way in which these stock subscriptions should be distributed. You understand that in this matter I am acting for Mr Edison, charged with the duty of protecting his interest solely. I should prefer to have this thing taken up among our friends because we then know with whom we are dealing. But there are some reasons, as I expressed to you to day, why I think one third of the cash subscription should be distributed among good men like Mr David Dows 5 and Mr. A. H. Barney,6 and others having no connection of any sort with Gas Companies; that some (perhaps a third, but certainly far from a controlling interest) should go to parties who are distinctively in the Gas interest or other lighting interests; and the remainder (and I should hope the larger portion) I should like to see taken by Western Union people. Truly Yours

(s[igne]d) G. P. Lowrey OB7

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:16). Letterhead of Porter, Lowrey, Soren & Stone, Attorneys & Counsellors at Law. a”New York,” and “187” preprinted. b”as to” interlined above. cEnclosure is L (copy). dObscured overwritten letters. eFollowing paragraph written in margin. Page 543

1. At three o’clock in the afternoon of 1 October, Twombly telegraphed Edison to arrange a meeting and was told by Batchelor that “Edison has just gone to bed.” Batchelor then suggested that Twombly and Edison arrange to speak by telephone, but Twombly urged that Edison come in and spend the night in New York. Although Edison telegraphed later that afternoon that he would come into New York at seven-twenty, Twombly arranged instead to go out to Menlo Park. He was apparently to be joined by Chauncey Depew, the general counsel for William Vanderbilt’s New York Central Railroad. Telegrams between Twombly and TAE, Batchelor and Twombly, and Depew and TAE, all 1 Oct. 1878, all DF (TAEM 18:13–15); DNB , s.v. “Depew, Chauncey Mitchell.”

2. James Banker had been a Western Union director and member of the company’s executive committee for many years. Western Union 1873–78.

3. Unidentified.

4. Probably A. T. Stewart.

5. David Dows was a commission merchant located at 20 South St. Wilson 1879, 390; Wilson’s Business Directory of New York City 1879,496.

6. Ashbel Barney was president of the U.S. Express Co. Wilson 1879, 71, and “City Register,” 39.

7. Unidentified.

  • Equipment Specification: Electric Lighting

Menlo Park, N.J., Oct 1st 1878a

Spiral so moulded right in plaster paris.1b

Contact point made one solid and small spring with spark point 2c


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Diaphragm model3


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

TAE
J Kruesi
Chas Batchelor
M N Force
Stockton L Griffin

Page 544

D, NjWOE, Lab., Vol. 16:75 (TAEM 4:548). Written by Batchelor; letterhead of T. A. Edison. Copied by William Carman into Cat. 994:159, Lab. (TAEM 3:249). ‘“Menlo Park, N.J.” and “187” preprinted, followed by centered horizontal line. ‘Drawing followed by centered horizontal line.

1. Edison’s drawing of this arrangement for the burner is in Vol. 16:68, Lab. (TAEM 4:545).

2. Edison and Batchelor drew alternative lever arrangements on 1 October and, on 3 October, Batchelor prepared another drawing with instructions for machinist George Jackson to alter the arrangement of the spring on the lever: “The little holdback for this spring at X is too far away from the points You must put it right close up to them only 1/16 away from them.” Vol. 16:69, 75½, 79, 97, Lab. (TAEM 4:545, 549, 551, 561); see also Batchelor’s undated instructions to Kruesi regarding the spring arrangement in Vol. 16:410–11, Lab. (TAEM 4:847).

3. The same day, Edison drew a lamp with an iridium burner molded into plaster of paris and regulated by this diaphram arrangement. NS-78-005, Lab. (TAEM 7:815).

Charles Batchelor’s lamp regulator drawing of 3 October.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Edisons drawing of an iridium burner lamp.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

  • Frotn Grosvenor Lowrey

New York, Octr 2nd 1878a

My Dear Edison:

Mr Twombly met me on my arrival in New York this morning and took me to Mr Vanderbilts house where I spent about an hour and a half. They seemed a good deal fortified by a remark of yours that I had put the figures up much higher than anything you had anticipated. I told them that proved how important it was that you should have a friend to advise you. We separated after a good deal of talk with an engagement to meet again at Mr Vanderbilts house this evening.

In the meantime Mr Billings has been here, and I have telegraphed to know when you could show the light. He says the proposition which I made in the letter to Mr Twombly, (a copy of which I enclosed to you yesterday,) is reasonable, if the light Page 545 is what I described it to be, and I have not attempted to do more than describe what my eyes rested upon.

And, now, Mr Banker and Mr Edson have been here. Mr Edson declares himself ready and willing to take up the proposition as made to Mr Twombly and go right on with it. I repudiated entirely his interpretation of what had taken place as constituting a contract, and said to him that he knew perfectly well that nothing had been arrived at, and fixed, in such a way as to make it improper for either party to with-draw. He himself would have felt at perfect liberty to have said to you that day, after thinking about the electric light, “I don’t think there is much in it, and I won’t put any money in”; and you know that you would not have felt that you had any right to complain of him for that.

I intend to unite all these competing interests into one concern; and Mr Edson and Mr Banker have declared that they will be satisfied if they have a chance to subscribe, for $10,000 each, in the $150,000 subscription, if you will make to them some private concession out of your stock. I would suggest that you give them $5000 each. I believe then that with this strong combination they will make more money than they would if they had been organized in the way they proposed with all the rest of the world outside fighting in the courts and elsewhere. They have just left me, and Mr Edson seemed, on the whole, to be contented. I said “you must smile upon me when you meet me, and not think I have wronged you.”

I do not see how you can do otherwise than come to New York if telegraphed for by Twombly; nevertheless I think in such matters two men may sometimes thwart each other, if they act separately, and you should be as reticent as you can, putting the matter upon me, or requiring, before saying anything, that I should be present.

Mr Twombly and I have discussed various ways of paying the $100,000; and probably this evening there will a proposition made that you shall receive $25 000 cash; that they spend $25 000 for the experiments; that at the end of the year, if the experiments are successful, you shall have $25 000 more, and that then you shall receive a yearly sum payable per month or per week, as you see fit instead of the round sum of $50,000 more, down. I think they will agree to this; and I suppose, from what I have heard you say about such matters, you would prefer the money payable in that way, from time to time.

I then propose that the first profits shall be used to restore Page 546 these gentlemens money; that after that you shall have a royalty, the amount of which we must get out with a little more soundness of judgment than before, for they all laugh at 25¢ royalty, Mr Vanderbilt saying this morning that it would produce to you Mr Astors fortune every year, and he did not suppose you wanted so much— There will be, therefore, two yearly sums to be provided for; one yearly sum in lieu of a cash payment of $50,000, and which may be made for your life or for the life of the patent, depending on what the sum is, and the other to be a yearly sum in lieu of royalty.

Mr Vanderbilt thought that would be more satisfactory to you than a royalty, because it is possible to cheat or be deceived in respect to royalties, and very difficult to keep the accounts.

I repeat to you that I see no difficulty in causing all these present competitors to unite to feel pleased with you and with me and with each other and give you what I demand.

And don’t you tell people any more that I demand too much for you. I mean to be perfectly just; and would not willingly demand too much for you any more than I would willingly demand less than I think ought to be paid to you. Yrs

G P. Lowrey

LS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:25). Letterhead of Porter, Lowrey, Soren & Stone, Attorneys & Counsellors at Law. a”New York,” and “187” preprinted.

  • From Theodore Puskas

Paris, le 2nd Octob. 18781

My dear Edison,

As I cabled you some days ago I made arrangements that one thousand dollars should be paid ia tob my name creditb to Serrell.—

I will cable you in a few days to let me know whether the money is paid by the tenth1—otherwise I will send it by cable from here. I will send also the surplus if more is needed.— I made it one thousand because the first lot for which I paid in New York was twelve hundred fifty—including Spain at 300,—but now according to the new law in Spain the inventor has 2 years time to apply for a patent.— If you let me have a share in the additional countries too—for which we have the telephone & phono patent,—please tell Serrell to cable me the amount and I will forward it at once with great pleasure.— If your invention is practical and only a little superior Page 547 to what they have got now in electric light—there is lots of money in it; and patents ought to be taken out in every known country.

Do you know [-]c Werderman’s patent.—(I think he got his patent ifor England in June last.)—2 They say he found also the indefinit subdivision of light.— It is rumored here that the London Gas Companys paid him about a fortnight ago for his English patent one million dollars.

There is a very strong Company here in france for Electric light.— I had already a talk with the managers—they are very anxious to hear more about your light. We will get from them all the money we want. Yours very truly

Theo. Puskas

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:174). Letterhead of Theodore Puskas. a“Paris, le” and “18” preprinted. bInterlined above. cCanceled.

1. Edison noted on the letter that he received it on 14 October.

2. Richard Werdermann’s low-resistance lamp (Brit. Pat. 2, 477 [1878]) produced a small, low-powered light at the point of contact between a thin carbon rod and a large carbon disk. An article about Werdermann’s light and system appeared in the 9 November London Metropolitan, under the heading “Gas and Water Notes.” This article noted that commercial introduction of the system was being undertaken by J. Berger Spence of 31 Lombard St., and that Cornelius Herz assisted Werdermann with a public demonstration on 6 November. Cat. 1240, item 1023, Batchelor (TAEM 94:420); “The Werdermann Electric Light,” Sci. Am. 39 (1878): 373.

The mechanism of Richard Werdermann’s contact arc lamp, with its carbon block and rod.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

  • Equipment Specification: Electric Lighting

Menlo Park, N.J., Oct 2 18781a

Mr. Kruesi—I want to have 5 lamps to show:—

1 = They all want to have safety spark points on lever.b

2 = They all want mounting on bases with bindpostsb

3 = They all want to have no 28 Iridium wire on spirals and expansionc rods.b

4 They all want to have 14 copper running from bindpost up to lightb

5 They all want no 28 copper wire connecting the shaft to bracket (round shaft points)b

6 Two of these 5, upstairs, have platina in, they also have thin copper connections from bindpost to working parts. Wire must be Iridium and copper thickerd Page 548

Kruesi Next one must have spring instead of lever like this and 2 iridium spirals of No 28 wire about 12 or 14 turns on each


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Kruesi Make an experimental Instrument on a sounder base like this:—


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

A is a bracket to hold one end of spiral

B is a pointed lever holding the other end, it is provided with a double point arrangement C.

D is regulating point. E is the safty point if the spiral busts the lever falls by weight W on to point

Make spring C very delicate and put ‘hold back’ close to points.b


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Regulator and Safety catch.2


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution
Page 549

Make base with 2 posts & glass over to put anything in3 Quantity spirals4


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Make spirals of finest platina wire with hook at each end & six holes in each plate.

The spirals to be ¾ long without the hooks The plates to be 1 in apart

Top ring

bottom ring

T A Edison
J Kruesi
G E Carman
Chas Batchelor
M N Force
Stockton L Griffin
W[illiam] C[arman]

D, NjWOE, Lab., Vol. 16:77, 81, 83, 86, 85 (TAEM 4:550–52, 554, 553)-Written by Charles Batchelor; first three pages on letterhead of T. A. Edison. Document multiply signed and dated. All except Vol. 16:77 copied by William Carman in Cat. 994:160–61, 170, Lab. (TAEM3:250, Page 550 255). a“Menlo Park, N.J.,” and “187” preprinted. bFollowed by centered horizontal line. cInterlined above. dFollowed by horizontal line.

Drawing from Charles Batchelor’s instructions; the slanted line front lower left leads to the copper strip and holes he mentioned.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

1. The editors have combined this series of experimental lamp specifications into a single document.

2. Text is “Plaster of Paris.”

3. The following day, Batchelor asked Kruesi to “make connections for the inside post, so that I can put them any where for circular or straight spirals.” He also made additional drawings and indicated that Kruesi should place “the holes in the copper strip and through the base so that I can shift the post close to the other one or keep further away.” Vol. 16:96, Lab. (TAEM 4:560).

4. Text is “no insulation” and “6 in a circle, finest platina wire.”

  • Technical Note: Telephony

Menlo Park, N.J.,» Oct 2 1878


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Platina Telephone receiver1 passage of the current heats the receiv platina & expansion works the diaphragm =


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

air draft cools platina & alters the resistance.

T A Edison
J Kruesi
G E Carman
Chas Batchelor
M. N Force
Stockton L. Griffin

Page 551

X, NjWOE, Lab., Vol. 14:159 and Vol. 18:14 (TAEM 4:317, 1057). Letterhead of T. A. Edison; document multiply signed and dated. Vol. 14:159 copied by William Carman in Cat. 996:85, Lab. (TAEM 3:321). a“Menlo Park, N.J.,” preprinted.

1. This design was one of several receivers Edison described in a 27 September draft caveat. This design and the one following, like those of 27 September, were intended to avoid infringing Alexander Graham Bell’s patent by getting rid of the electromagnet in the receiver or by having it vibrate the diaphragm indirectly. Both of the designs here draw on Edison’s efforts to regulate the current in his electric lamps by using the expansion and contraction of a platinum wire to alter the resistance in a circuit.

A telephone receiver design, using “iron with some elastic substance,”in Edison’s 27 September 1878 draft of a caveat.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Another design in the draft caveat became patent application Case 159, but no patent ever issued and only the drawing is extant. The patent described in this application or one of the other 27 September designs may be the new receiver mentioned by Edison in Doc. 1461. Vol. 14:150–51, 153, 155–56, Lab. (TAEM 4:307–8, 310, 313–14); Patent Application Drawings (TAEM 8:754).

  • To Grosvenor Lowrey

[Menlo Park,] Oct 4th 3da [187]81

Friend Lowrey,

Go ahead— I shall agree to nothing, promise nothing and say nothing to any person leaving the whole matter to you. All I want at present is to be provided with funds to push the light rapidly.2 Yours

T A Edison

ALS (letterpress copy), NjWOE, Lbk. 3:390 (TAEM 28:824). aInterlined above.

1. On 4 October, Lowrey and Hamilton Twombly went to see Edison at Menlo Park. Lowrey to TAE, 4 Oct. 1878, DF (TAEM 18:30).

2. On 5 October, Lowrey telegraphed Edison: “Those gentlemen prefer to wait until some day next week when the light is in good condition to be seen send your messenger down for the money I will leave it at the office for him answer as soon as you get this because if there are no trains coming down I will send my messenger out by the 3 oclock train.” Edison replied that he would send a messenger. Lowrey advanced Edison three hundred dollars for electric light expenses with the expectation he would be reimbursed after the formation of the Edison Electric Light Co. Two hundred dollars of this money went to Lemuel Serrell for patent expenses. Lowrey to TAE, TAE to Lowrey, and Porter, Lowrey, Soren & Stone to TAE, all 5 Oct. 1878, DF (TAEM 18:31, 771); Electric Light Co. Statement Book, Accts. (TAEM 88:424, 427).

  • Draft Caveat: Electric Lighting

Menlo Park Oct 3 1878

Caveat No. 31

Electric Light Subdivision

The object of this invention is to subdivide the Electric Light and to make a Lamp which is self acting or controllable

The invention consists in the various devices for effecting this object, such devices I am now experimenting with to ascertain their availability for the purpose I have allready filed caveats in which several forms of Lamps are shown and described2

Fig 1a


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 1 shows the method of causing the rise in the temperature to regulate the temperature of the spiral by the expansion of the inclosed air.3 Q is the glass case made air tight .A. is the incandescent spiral wire D. is the bottom frame4 work two air holes5 B. and B’ lead from a chamber containing A into a space. C is a diaphragm air tight, when the spiral A becomes heated it instantly expands the air and this forces the diaphragm outward to a distant proportionate withb the rise in temperature in the centre of this diaphragm is a platina wire K faceingb this is another platina point6 1 on the end of a flexible spring m when the temperature rises in a to a certain point come in contact and short circuit the spiral it temperature falls and the air contracts the diaphragm recedes and the same operation goes on incessantly. H is an extra platina point7 called “the safety “catch” this point is connected to the diaphragm, should the points K & 1 fail to make a connection owing to dust or oxide the temperature of A will rise still higher (but not to its melting point) this will force the spring m down and the spiral A will be short circuited. Just as if K & 1 had not failed an extra catch is arranged with the spiral which should it fuse will close the circuit, these safety catches are shown in figs 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 & 8 the two springs which hold the spiral in all cases are allowed to fall back or forward when the spiral melts and close the circuit Page 553

fig 2


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 3


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 4


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 6


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 7


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 8


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 9


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 9 shews the secondary Battery S. B. arranged with the short circuit to prevent sparks in the points a small condenser might replace it.

fig 10


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 10 shews a spiral filled with some non conductor which becomes incandescent at a low heat

fig 11


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 11 shews a seperate spiral S. immerced in air or a liquid in a seperate compartment covered by a diaphragm the operation is obvious

Fig 12


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution
Page 554

Fig 12 shows the spiral S in a house8 worked by secondary Batteries S.B instead of the direct current the latter be used to charge the Battery9 m and its lever is vibrated rapidly by a self make and break spring or an electric Engine clock-work or other motor may rotate a commutator to accomplish the circuit changes

fig 13


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 13 shows a spiral placed horizontally the two connecting wires being carried through a peice of chalk .C. or similar material m is Brass peice contaning the chalk provided with two air holes10 1 and i’. to allow the expanded air to remove the diaphragm K. outward and regulate the temperature of the spiral .S.

fig 14


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 15


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 16


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 17


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 18


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 19


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 20


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 21


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 22


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 23


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 24


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 25


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 26


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 27


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 28


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 29


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 30


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution
Page 555

fig 31


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 32


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 33


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 34


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 35


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 36


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 37


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 38


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 39


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Figs. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31 & 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. & 39 are different forms in which I propose to experiment with in ascertaining the best form for giving light by incandescenceb due to the passage of the Electric current through them

fig 40


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 40 shows a regulating wire n and cone c of fine metalic foil kept incandescent.

fig 41


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 41 shows a simple method of regulating the temperature of the spiral S.

I shall probably claim regulating the temperature of a conducting body rendered incandescent by an Electric current by causing the expansion of air in which it is enclosed to move a diaphragm lever or equivalent substantiallyb as set forth

2d The double contact points or safety catches substantially as set forth

3d The various arrangement of the incandescent Bodies

Thomas A Edison

Page 556

DfS (copy), NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 997:69 (TAEM 3:386). Written by William Carman. aDrawings together on two separate pages. bObscured overwritten letters.

1. Figures 17–19, 21–22, and 39–41 were included in Edison’s Caveat 85, filed 25 October 1878 (Edison Caveat 85). Drawings related to this draft caveat are in Vol. 16:59, 64, 66, 68–75, 78–85, 89, 91–93, 95, 104; and NS-78-005; both Lab. (TAEM 4:538, 543–48, 550–53, 557–60, 567; 7:814–18). Many of the drawings in the draft caveat have figure labels for parts which are not discussed in the text.

2. Though Edison had drafted two electric light caveats (Docs. 1427 and 1456), he did not file his first caveat on this subject until 7 October (No. 82). A second (No. 84) was filed on 12 October, and two others (Nos. 83 and 85) were filed on 25 October. Only the latter two are extant, but what may be a copy of one of the earlier caveats is in DF (TAEM 18:864). See Doc. 1576 and Edison Caveats 83 and 85.

3. See Doc. 1462.

4. “D” appears at the far right inside the frame.

5. Both are labeled “B.”

6. Mislabeled “s.”

7. “h” in diagram, below “s.”

8. Perhaps “shunt” in original.

9. Should be “electromagnet.”

10. “J” and “J”‘ in drawing.

  • Technical Note: Telephony

Menlo Park, Oct 3rd 1878

Speaking Telephone Receiver1


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

The above enclosed in a case to prevent evaporation deliquescent 2 Page 557


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Attachment for truing Discs3


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

TAE J
Kruesi
G E Carman
C. P. Edison
Chas Batchelor
Martin Force

X, NjWOE, Lab., Vol. 18:15–16, 18, 17 (TAEM 4:1057–59). Written by Charles Edison; letterhead of T. A. Edison. Document multiply signed and dated. Copied by William Carman in Cat. 996:81–83, Lab. (TAEM 3:319–20).

1. Text is “water & sponge” and “deliquescent.”

2. Text is “Boog Troup” (bug trap).

3. Another arrangement labeled “for truing up discs” and dated 2 October is in Vol. 18:13, Lab. ( TAEM 4:1056).

  • Telegrams: To/From William Wallace

October 4, 1878a

Menlo Park, N.J.,b 3:30 pm

Mr William Wallace

What is the price of duplicate of machine that you got the long arc from 1 Answer free

T A Edison
Ansonia, Conn 4:3055

T A Edison

One Thousand dollars to you twenty five per cent discount confidential

Wm Wallace
Menlo Park, N.J.,b 5:00

Wm Wallace

Have you one on hand

T A Edison
Ansonia, Conn 6:11

T A Edison

Can have one ready in three days

Wm Wallace
Menlo Park, N.J.,b 6:12 pm

Wm Wallace

Send it and draw at sight2

T A Edison

L (telegrams), NjWOE, DF (TAEM 17:937). Written by Stockton Griffin; letterhead of T. A. Edison. aDate taken from document, form altered. b”Menlo Park, N.J.” preprinted.

1. The generator acquired by Edison, and which he subsequently referred to as the large Wallace, is on exhibit in the Menlo Park laboratory complex machine shop at the Henry Ford Museum and Greenfield Village (Acc. 29.1980.1832). According to Prescott 1878c (p. 423), “the machines made by Messrs. Wallace & Sons weigh from one hundred and twenty-five to three thousand pounds each, and are capable of producing a light equal to that of from one thousand to forty thousand candles. Some of them will even maintain the arc with the carbons three and a half inches apart.” Edison was apparently referring to this latter feature in his telegram. According to the New York Sun, Edison’s small Wallace generator produced light equal to 4,000 candles while his large one produced the equivalent of 24,000. “Edison’s Electric Light,” New York Sun, 20 Oct. 1878, Cat. 1241, item 963, Batchelor (TAEM 94:382); Edison’s testimony, p. 42; John Kruesi’s testimony, pp. 80–81, both Keith v. Edison v. Brush.

The basic design of these generators was conceived by Moses Farmer in 1875. They were subsequenly improved and manufactured Page 559 in William Wallace’s shop. Two different sizes of Wallace-Farmer dynamos were among several machines tested earlier in the year by Edwin Houston and Elihu Thomson for the Franklin Institute (their candlepower is largely unknown). Their report, reprinted in Prescott 1879 (439–72), noted the difficulty of obtaining sufficient power to maintain a large Wallace-Farmer generator at its proper speed. They also found the small Wallace-Farmer uneconomical because so much energy was lost in local action. Indeed, their primary criticism of the Wallace-Farmer design was its armature, in which the coils projected from the rotating disk, which produced “considerable resistance to rotation” and caused excessive heating. This defect was also noted by other investigators. Houston and Thomson 1878; Morton 1879, 52; Thompson 1886, 31.

The Wallace-Farmer “large” dynamo.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

2. The machine was probably sent on 7 October, the same day that Edison was billed for it. On 10 October, Wallace wrote Edison to tell him that the machine should be run at about 800 revolutions per minute and indicated that he should “have received it ere this.” Cat. 1161:57, Accts.; DF (TAEM 17:942).

  • Mining Circular

San Francisco, Oct. 4th 1878.

Dear Sir:—1

Mr. Thomas A. Edison of New Jersey has begun some scientific inquiry and experiments with a view of devising means for effectively and economically reducing the temperature in the deep workings of mines.2

He seems satisfied that he can accomplish this far enough to make it possible for men to work easily through an eight or ten hour shift.

To assist him in this, he has requested me to get as much information as possible regarding the present thermal condition of the principal mines on the Comstock lode, and the effectiveness of the means now in use for ventilating and reducing temperature.

Believing that, in view of Mr. Edison’s well known reputation as an inventor, and the importance of the result likely to be obtained, you will readily furnish the information he Page 560 wishes, I enclose a blank to be filled out with such information as you may have or can easily obtain,3 and returned to me to be forwarded to him, or if you prefer, it may be sent directly to him, addressed, Mr. Thomas A. Edison, Menlo Park, New Jersey.

I trust that you will add any information likely to be of any use to Mr. Edison, and at as early date as possible, forward. Very truly Yours

Howard Schuyler4

ALS (electric-pen copy), NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:595).

1. This circular letter was addressed to the secretaries of mining companies based in San Francisco.

2. When Edison toured a mine in Virginia City, Nev., during the summer, he had been impressed by the damp heat in the shafts. He told a reporter after his return to Menlo Park that “the perspiration just flowed off one when we got down to the 1, 800-foot level. The air was full of moisture and, of course, there was no evaporation. We just breathed the dampness in through our lungs and sent it out through our pores.” He noted that the dry outside air was far more comfortable despite being over 120 degrees. “Edison’s Trip and Inventions,” New York Daily Graphic, 28 Aug. 1878, Cat. 1240, item 858, Batchelor (THEM 94:338).

After his return from the West, Edison proposed that reducing moisture in the shafts would lower the temperatures, which exceeded 150 degrees. He told The New York Sun that he knew the cause of the heat:

“What makes the heat? The water. That’s what makes it. Pumps are at work all the time, trying to pump it out, but the walls and levels and all nooks are dripping with moisture. This water evaporates and generates more heat. The way to stop it is to stop the evaporation. Do you see that little pond out there,” pointing to the little basin near the laboratory. “A pint of cotton-seed oil thrown upon it will stop its evaporation. All right. Now if they will take a few pails of cotton-seed oil and go down into the mine where the men are working .. . and swash the walls with the oil, covering the standing water, it ought to stop the evaporation in the mine. The generation of heat would cease, and the air become much cooler. I believe that if the thing was tried it would prove a success.” [“Four Hours with Edison,” New York Sun, 28 Aug. 1878, Cat. 1240, item 859, Batchelor (TAEM 94:339)]

3. Schuyler enclosed a copy of the blank. On 16 October, Josiah Reiff forwarded to Edison what was probably a completed form, which has not been found. DF (TAEM 18:596, 16:242).

4. Howard Schuyler was a railroad civil engineer living in San Francisco. He had earlier helped to survey a transcontinental route, and about this time he supervised construction of the North Pacific Coast Railroad’s line north from San Francisco. Langley 1878, 759; Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 36 (1896): 572–74.

  • Technical Note: Telephony

Menlo Park, N.J.a Oct 4th 1878

Speaking Telephone Receiver1


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

A—point made of caustic & chalk or other substances2


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

TAE
J Kruesi
G E Carman
Chas Batchelor
Martin Force
Chas P. Edison
W Carman

X, NjWOE, Lab., Vol. 18:19 (TAEM 4:1059). Written by Charles Edison; Page 562 letterhead of T. A. Edison. Document multiply signed and dated. Copied by William Carman into Cat. 996:82–84, Lab. (TAEM 3: 320–21). a“Menlo Park, N.J.,” preprinted.

1. Text is “water” in the smaller sketch; “ metal ,” “wick,” and “water” in the larger one.

2. Text is “water.”

  • To Theodore Puskas

Menlo Park N.J. Oct 5th 1878’

My Dear Puskas

I take pleasure in acknowledging the receipt of your favor of the 23d ult and the accompanying documents. 2 Am translating them by the aid of a dictionary. Will return them to you by the first steamer, which I think sails Wednesday Oct 9th.3 They will go on one of the French line and will I think, just reach you in time and that is all—

Regarding the phono receipts, I think ½ would be a fair division.

I take pleasure in informing you that I have discovered a new telephone receiver in which no magnet is used. It reproduces the voice several times louder than any magneto receiver— Whispering is reproduced so as to be heard one foot away from the receiver.

The Electric light is going to be a great success.

I have something entirely new— Wm H Vanderbilt and friends have taken it in this country and on Monday next advance $50,000 to conduct experiments

I retain ½ half of the capital stock of the Co they are to form and also receive a royalty of $30,000 yearly if it proves more economical than gas which I am certain it will do. Vanderbilt is the largest gas stock owner in America.

Carbon telephones great success here. I furnish 200 carbon buttons daily to manufacturers (several firms being engaged) making them for the Western Union

I propose to send you through Gouraud a sample of each kind. I do not send them direct for fear of the French patent law, on the subject of imported articles patented in France— 4 Very Truly

Thomas A. Edison.

LS, HuBPo, TP. Written by Stockton Griffin.

1. An undated draft by Edison is in DF (TAEM 16:364); a letterpress copy is in Lbk. 3:394 ( TAEM 28:828).

2. See Doc. 1449 n. 2. Page 563

3. The same day as this letter, Edison received a cable from Puskas, “Power must be here by twenty first,” to which he replied, “Papers go Wednesday.” DF (TAEM 19:937).

4. If the holder of a French patent imported into France objects manufactured abroad, but covered by the French patent, the patent could be voided.

  • Technical Note: Electric Lighting

Menlo Park, N.J., Oct 5 1878a

Caveat No 4 Electric Light1


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

I propose to use reflectors on the bottom and top of the straight glass holders, or in the case of a globe place the incandescent conductor in the centre so it will be in the universal focus Perhaps I can use something in the glass that will radiate well, thus throwing back the heat & allowing the light to pass through.2

If Iridium wire is so impure I propose to use a cable composed of a number of exceedingly fine wires twisted together instead of a le»g single strand with the same amount of metal in the stranded cable

TAE

Chas Batchelor

X, NjWOE, Lab., NS-78-005 (TAEM 7:823). Letterhead of T. A. Edison; document multiply signed. ““Menlo Park, N.J.” and “187” preprinted.

1. Though among several pages of drawings and notes made by Edison between 3 and 8 October in preparation for draft caveat No. 4 (Doc. 1485), this was not included.

2. In a note of 8 October, Edison wrote, “Paint the globes with substance that will reduce the refrangibility of the light.” NS-78-005, Lab. (TAEM 7:825).

  • From Moses Farmer

Newport R.I. Oct. 7″ 1878.

Friend Edison,

I enclose a small bar of pure Iridium—thinking that you may like to use it for a tracing point for one of your Phonographs— Page 564

I have for some time been intending to send it to you—but have neglected to to do— I would expect it to answer better than steel—& to be little inferior to a Ruby—because it is stronger—

While it is not tough & will not bear bending still it is not as brittle as a Garnet—

It is one of the bars that I have used for experiments on Electric Light—1 It gives off much more light than does Platinum—because it will bear a higher temperature—

I will not however withstand so high a temperature as will a similar carbon bar in vacuo or in Nitrogen— I have obtained as much as 100 to 125 candle light from a square inch of platinum—five or six hundred or even more from Iridium—& over 14 000, from a sq. inch of carbon—

This latter is the most promising—when sealed tightly from oxygen either in vacuo—or in Nitrogen—

How soon will your new Phonographs be ready— Shall you sell or rent them—? If you sell them what will one cost me?—

Would you loan me one of your Carbon Telephones for a few weeks? & could I also get one of Phelps Crown Telephones for a few experiments— The Bell hpeople have loaned me half a dozen or more for experiment—& have constructed them with different resistances—5 ohms 80—450—660 &c.—& with one pair I conversed through 623 000. ohms readily—& could hear with a shunt on the receiver which took off half the current— [Stocky?]2a whose hearing is impaired wishes to know if you are making progress towards affording relief to deaf people. Truly Yours

Moses G. Farmer.

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:188). aIllegible.

1. Farmer first experimented with electric lights in 1858. The following year, he succeeded in lighting the parlor of his house in Salem, Mass., with platinum-foil lamps heated to incandescence by the current from a set of batteries and regulated by a variable rheostat. Farmer later exhibited his lamps at Charles Williams’s shop in Boston, where he had a small laboratory. The exhibition of these lamps ended with the fire at Williams’s shop discussed by Edison in Doc. 34, and it is likely that Edison had seen Farmer’s lamps. Farmer published an account of his experiments in Prescott 1879 (515–25), in which he stated

Pure iridium gave the best results of any of the metals. Alloys of iridium and platinum gave next best results, and next to this, platinum and palladium. Carbon, when inclosed in an atmosphere free from oxygen, also gave satisfactory results. Nitrogen, carbonic oxide and hydrogen are all suitable gases to surround the incandescent Page 565 carbon. A vacuum is, perhaps, better, were it not for the difficulty of maintaining it.

The important point is, that the higher the temperature of the incandescent substance, the greater the amount of light; and it is very noteworthy, that it requires nearly half as much current to make platinum shine in the dark as it does to fuse the wire or ribbon. Three quarters of the fusing current will not give one half the light that will be given off by seven eights of the fusing current. A flat ribbon of platinum will give nearly one hundred candle lights per square inch, if it be maintained within two hundred degrees Fahrenheit of the melting point, and I have been able to keep it at this temperature for hours and days. A bar of pure iridium, owing to its higher melting point, will give several times as much light as an equal and equally exposed surface of platinum; but, since pure iridium is neither malleable nor ductile when cold, it is costly to work it into convenient shape; hence, I have had recourse to alloys of platinum and iridium, which, although they do not give so much light as pure iridium, are yet superior to pure platinum.

It is not known if Prescott received Farmer’s account before he sent this chapter to Edison for review in mid-November (Doc. 1492 n. 1). See also accounts of Farmer’s electric light experiments in Defendant’s Exhibit Silliman’s Journal Article, Sawyer C Man v. Edison (U.S.), (TAEM 47:916); Farmers’s reminiscences, MGF; and Bright 1972, 44–46.

2. Unidentified.

  • Frotn George Gouraud

[London,] 7 Oct 1878a

Edison

Panic in Gas shares.1 electric light occupying much public discussion large combinations forming to work it but hesitate which system to adopt.2 how soon can Adams shew your system here, if you will cable what it is desirable to say about it, if anything I will publish such a letter in leading newspapers as will at least delay anybody’s purchasing until your system can be seen

Gouraud

L (telegram), NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:138). Message form of Direct United States Cable Co., Ltd. a“187” preprinted.

1. According to the 1 January 1879 issue of the Telegraphic Journal and Electrical Review (7:2): “On the 4th of October, when public interest in the new illuminator was beginning to rise, Mr. Edison telegraphed to London and Paris that he had solved the problem of sub-dividing the electric light indefinitely; and such was the influence of the inventor’s reputation, and the excited state of the financial atmosphere, that a panic in gas shares, from which they have not yet recovered, immediately ensued.” The telegram as quoted in the 10 October issue of Nature (18:610) stated: “I have just solved the problem of the sub-division of the electric light indefinitely.” Neither the telegram nor other direct quotations of it have been found; however, it is very similar to the text Page 566 of Charles Batchelor’s 16 September letter to James Adams (Doc. 1438). On 5 October at least one Paris paper, L’Electricité (TAEM 94:418), published an account of Edison’s telegram. Regarding the price of gas in London and New York see “Edison’s Electric Light: The Invention that is Expected to Finally Put Out the Gas,” New York Daily Graphic , 14 Oct. 1878; “The New Inventions,” ibid., 21 Oct. 1878; London Daily News, 9 Oct. 1878; all Cat. 1241, items 955, 961, 970, Batchelor (TAEM 94:377, 381, 385); “Gas in London and New York,” New York Sun, 23 Sept. 1878, Cat. 1032:134, Scraps. (TAEM 27:923); “The Electric Light and the Gas Companies—Remarkable Eifect of a New Invention in the Stock Markets,” Sci. Am. 39 (2 November 1878): 272.

2. By mid October three electric light companies had been registered: the Electric Lighting Company and the British Electric Light Company, each with capital stock of £100,000, and the Sun Electric Light Company, with a capital of £5,000. At the same time, the London Court of Common Council expressed interest in electric street lighting. On 8 October, the London Stereoscopic Company, which was marketing Edison’s phonograph, began using a Siemens arc lighting system in front of its Regent St. shop. “The Electric Light and Mr. Edison’s Discovery,” Manchester City News, 19 Oct. 1878; “The Electric Light,” London Daily News, 9 Oct. 1878; both Cat. 1241, items 970, 991, Batchelor (TAEM 94:385, 402); Bowers 1982, 105, 108.

  • Technical Note: Phonograph

[Menlo Park,] Oct 7 1878

Phonograph 1

Cylinder stationary fast on shaft

Cylinder with 3 threads on one end2

Arm for mouthpiece on sleeve” with rack to engage in the cylinder thread

Arm with upright to stop against

Friction device for holding up the sleeve when turning out

Flyb wheel on bottom of second shaft3 Cylinderb 9 in[ch] diam

Designb in Shell clockwork covered up & speak through mouthpiece

Makeb arm that carries all mouth piece, stop pin, and rack swing from one common centre4


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

TAE
J Kruesi
Chas Batchelor
Geo E Carman
M N Force

X, NjWOE, Lab., Vol. 17:149 (TAEM 4:1011). Written by Charles Batchelor. aObscured overwritten letter. bPreceded by dash as check mark. Page 567

1. Work on this new design for a dictating phonograph apparently began about 5 October, when either Edison or Batchelor sketched several elements, including the flywheel arrangement (below a clockwork drive inside the base), the cylinder, and the method of arranging a roll of tin foil in the interior of the cylinder. Most of the drawings related to this design are by Batchelor and most date from 8 October. Measured drawings were prepared on 9 October and the last related drawing is dated 14 October. Time sheets indicate that five members of the laboratory staff spent 60 hours working on the dictating phonograph between 9 and 17 October. An account record shows that a total of forty dollars was spent making a machine between 11 and 18 October. There is no other evidence of work or experiments with this device, although the design was included in Edison’s U.S. Patent 227, 679, which he executed on 19 March 1879. Vol. 17:144–78, Lab. ( TAEM 4:1007–37); Cat. 1185:284, Accts. (TAEM 22:681); time sheets for John Kruesi, Rudolph Hense, John Hood, Thomas Logan, and Alfred Swanson, DF (TAEM 17:740, 747–50).

Edison may have been speaking about this machine in an interview that appeared in the 20 October New York Sun.

A sheet of tin foil that will hold 4,000 words is now placed in the machine automatically. A perfected instrument runs by machinery, and you can stop it at any time by pulling a cord. The register is perfect, and it does not get out of gear. While it does not talk as loud as some of the old machines, it catches the labials and consonants perfectly and throws them out more evenly. Any man can dictate to it at his leisure, and his office boy can run out a half dozen or dozen words, stop the machine by pulling the cord, and write out what is desired. [“Edison’s Electric Light,” Cat. 1241, item 963, Batchelor (TAEM 94:382)]

2. This may refer to the set of drawings Batchelor made the following day showing the method of drawing the tin foil out from the reel within the cylinder and attaching it to the outside. At the bottom of this set of drawings Batchelor noted, “3 rods foil drawn one way first next time the opposite way so as always to place it between two rods.” Vol. 17:167, Lab. (TAEM 4:1026).

Method of drawing tinfoil from the inside reel and attaching it to the cylinder.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

3. This arrangement was shown by Batchelor in a drawing of 8 October. Vol. 17:162, Lab. (TAEM 4:1021). Page 568

Patent drawing ofan arm and rack arrangement with flexible tube to allow operator to pause the phonograph during recording and playback.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

4. The patent drawing shows an arm and rack arrangement connected to a flexible tube that allowed an operator to pause during recording and playback. According to the patent, the operator

simply has to draw upon the flexible tube, which swings the parts so as to disconnect the screw-rack from the flange s of the cylinder. This at the same time moves away the recording or the phonet point. The cylinder A can continue to revolve, and when the operator is ready he releases the pull upon the flexible tube, and the parts commence to act again at the exact place where the operation was suspended, because the screw-threads will only drop together when the proper part of the thread s comes to the corresponding part on the rack 25. [U.S. Pat. 227, 679]

  • Draft to William Barrett

Menlo Park, N.J.,a [c. October 7, 1878] 1

Write Barrett & say will resene! him some more apparatus for his lectures Say that the Statement of Hughes that Clerac made resistanceb tubes with carbon the resistance being varied by pressure and which were said to have been used to regulate the resistance of telegraph lines cannot possibly be true for the reason that any changes the amount of resistance that would be thrown in and out of the line by the difference of pressure would be tso small as not to be detected by any apparatus worked on telegraph lines, that I have tried tubes of every size & character with carbon in every degree of finer division & no morse apparatus would detect the change that the thing is an after thought on the part of Hughes and one which fortunately can be proved untrue. CUndoubtedly Clerac mayde tubes filled with carbon that were adjusted to 50 10 500 &or any number of ohms but that he filled tubes with carbon & obtained these resistance by varying the pressurec couldd not possibly be true in 1856 if it cannot now be done; I believe that it is rather unusual to bring Nothing has ever been published that I can find where Clerac claimede this statement of Hughes was set forth. Regarding Mr Preece; Page 569 None of my letters in the public Journals accused him of anything but abusing my confidence; which he did from what cause I cannot imagine. When I said abused my confidence I did not imply that he gave to Hughes any ideas. But that he had abused the confidences I placed in his promise that he would bring the matter my Carbon telephone before the authorities & societies there a result which I had hoped for and which I sent him oned of my assistants with telephones. I gave him every chance to explain matters because in my first telegram which was widely published, I said, “If you do not set the matter right I shall with details.” After waiting for some time and receiving no reply I then wrote the letters The hard words spoken of were came mainly from newspaper reporters who sympathized with me especially as nearly every scientific man here whom these reporters saw gave the opinion that there was no difference between the microphone & telephone You will notice that my letters are made ofup mostly of extracts from printed publications while Hughes’ replies are insinuations & statements «ethaving nothing to do with the controversy. In one statement he says my apparatus was cumbersome & did not work well that an induction coil had to be used, (that Cl with one week afterwards he applies an induction coil to his device to make it speechb audible to an audiencef & writes to that effect to a French paper—) He then drags Clerac in makes a statement that an account of itg was published in the Journal Telegraphique of 1873. whereas there is not one word about it & insinuates that my tubes in 1873 was a singular coincidence;d Yet not one word is found about it in the Journal Télégraphique of 1873; I am quite willing te setMr Pr to explain matters when Mr Preece shall come out before our society of Telgh Engineers and explain Scientifically the difference between theh Carbon Telephone & Microphone;

It may astonish you when I state that I have a peice of paper with sketches of my own and Mr Preece when he was here in the laboratory in which an instrument is drawn precisely the same as is sold by one firm in London as the Hughes Microphone This drawing was made to shew to him’ the effect of pressure by weights, thus2


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution
Page 570

His name is shown—one of my scrap books

Again the London Engineering left out of the article I sent them the cut


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

andd kept all the others in probably because it looked too much like the microphone; again they left out the paragraph where I said I used conducting sulphides oxides, finely divided metals etc and then also severald paragraphsd about the non use of a diaphragm but in every case giving credit to Hughes for just what they suppressed from the article. Now the proEditors of Engineering could not have any object in suppressing these paragraphs’1 and both Mr P & H had hence I cannot but infer that it was their handiwork, if so why was this necessary if everything was as they claimed.

The fact of the matter is If prior publication is ofd no use: what protection has any scientific man against justb such mat ters as this, against a person who dont read the journals and designs apparatus in

Excuse me for writing so long a letter but I feel very grieved over this matter Preeces failure to understand Hughes work and to defend me, or at least explain and also at his subsequent action. He must have known that I was the first to use finely divided conducting matter to translate sonorous wvibrations into electric waves. Exactly what Hughes did.

The Motorgraph action was discovered by me in holding my finger on a tin recording point of a Bain recorder in 1872. Ab Motion to a lever was moved’ was obtained in 1874 A machine was designed & made in 1874 whereby vibrations were obtained, levers moved etc.

The Bell telephone was made an used by me in 1875, before Bell had invented his. I used several of them for receiving musical vibrations but Bell had the merit of discovering that such Receivers would act as transmitters. Litigation This is the point of the litigation in the patent office at the present time.

TAE

ADfS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:194). Letterhead of T. A. Edison. a“Menlo Park, N.J.” preprinted. bInterlined above. c”by varying the pressure” interlined above. dObscured overwritten letters. e”Clerac claimed” interlined above. f”to an audience” interlined in margin. g”of it” interlined above. ‘“difference between the” interlined above, ‘“to him” interlined above, ‘“was moved” interlined above. Page 571

1. The letter as sent to Barrett was dated 7 October. See Doc. 1507.

2. The paper with this and other drawings mentioned by Edison has not been found, though there are similar drawings from the period of Preece’s 1877 visit (cf. Doc. 920 [fig. A]). Preece and Edison did discuss the pressure relay and the first pressure tests of plumbago also took place during that time (Docs. 909, 937, and 941).

  • Draft to George Gouraud

Menlo Park, N.J., Oct 8 1878a

Working up details of

Was Gouraud.

Say nothing publicly about light let them go ahead I have only correct principle. Requires six months to work up details. Gas men here hedged by going in with me.b Twenty telephones go on seventeenth, dont wait for new things go ahead on what you have, sample new receiver be sent soons ready.1

= Edison

〈Copy sent to Ward〉2c

ADfS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:139). Letterhead of T. A. Edison. a“Menlo Park, N.J.,” and “187” preprinted; date written by Griffin. b”Gas ... me.” interlined above; “by” and “ing” interlined above and below “go” in main interlineation. ‘Written by Stockton Griffin.

1. On 3 October, Gouraud had cabled: “Send immediately twenty transmitters only with binding posts also new receivers without magnet if ready. Takes too long to make anything here.” On 7 October he again cabled: “Are any more telephones on the way. Shall we go ahead & make a lot like those already received or wait new model without magnet receiver. Hurry forward a lot after model you most approve.” DF ( TAEM 19:936, 938).

2. A clean version of this, for transmission to London, was sent the same day with a covering note to George Ward of the Direct United States Cable Co. Lbk. 3:396 (TAEM 28:830).

  • From Charles Bailey

New York, October 8th 1878.a

Dear Sir:

Please find herewith my report of sales for the month of September, which shows a gratifying continuance of public interest in your invention; the demand however for these merely experimental instruments cannot be expected to last many months longer, but will I hope be replaced by Sales of the “Standard machine” which I understand you are perfecting.1

While appreciating that you are always very busy we should be glad to see you oftener when in town. Very Truly

Chas. E. Bailey Treas.

Page 572

ENCLOSUREb

New York Oct. 8. 1878.c

Statement of Phonographs Sold and del’d. in September 1878. 2

A. M. Musser3 (Royalty paid)4 #1.
Jacob Backus (Royalty paid) #8.
H. A. Parr (Royalty paid) #19.
Silver & Laws #80. 185.
J. N. Fartenburg #86. 185.
M. T. Higginbotham #91. 185.
E. B. Hamlin #98. 185.
Ditto #99. 185.
W. L. McGee #100. 185.
E. H. Harvey #102. 135-
A. C. Lovell #i05.5 185.
E. B. Hamlin #106. 185.
M. F. Lopez #107. 185.
J. P. Calvert #108. 185.
Orrin Bros #109. 185.
E. B. Hamlin #110. 135.
$2305c
20%d on above amt is $461.c

This amt. $461. is accordingly passed to the credit of your a/c this day.c

E[rrors].&Q[missions].E[xcepted].c

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 19:192). Letterhead of Edison Speaking Phonograph Co. a“New York,” and “18” preprinted. bEnclosure is an AD written by Bailey on ledger paper. cUnderlined twice. d20%” preceded by line across left column. ‘“This. .. day.” preceded and followed by lines across left column.

1. Edison Speaking Phonograph Co. royalty reports to Edison show that forty-six large phonographs had been sold by the company to prospective exhibitors during May 1878 and another twenty-seven in June. Only three sales were reported for July, one of which involved an exchange; fifteen more phonographs were sold in August, while three previously sold machines were sold again. Sales rose in October to twenty-three, after James Redpath’s royalty ended, and the total was again $2, 305 with Edison receiving $461. In November, however, only ten phonographs were sold and Bailey remarked that it was “to be expected that the interest in a mere exhibition machine will die out but Mr. Johnson hopes to produce something before long that will excite a new demand.” Edison Speaking Phonograph Co. royalty statements for May-November 1878; Bailey to TAE, 4 Dec. 1878; all DF (TAEM 19:181–83, 187, 190, 193, 198, 200–1).

Similar concerns about future sales had been expressed two weeks Page 573 earlier by Theodore Puskas, who reported total sales of about 150 phonographs in Europe but asserted that there were “over 200 on hand which I cannot sell.” Puskas to TAE, 23 Sept. 1878, DF (TAEM 16:110).

2. This is an example of the monthy royalty statements Edison received from the Edison Speaking Phongraph Co. reporting the purchaser’s name, the serial number of the phonograph purchased, the price for each, and the amount due as a royalty. The machine’s number would be found on each of its major parts. Regarding phonograph prices see Doc. 1397 n. 1. Other statements from 1878 are in 78–031, DF (TAEM 19:173); similar reports exist for January through July 1879 in 79–032 (TAEM 51:681).

3. No attempt has been made to identify the purchasers.

4. The phonographs numbered 1, 8, and 19 were listed in the royalty report for May as having been sold; it is evident from the reports that when a sale failed to go through or a machine was returned, Edison kept the royalty he had been given for that sale but received no royalty upon its resale.

5. This machine is on display at the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Mich, (see Doc. 1416).

  • Draft Caveat: Electric Lighting

Menlo Park NJ Oct. 8 1878

Electric Light Subdivision Caveat No 41

The object of this invention is to subdivide the Electric Light by causing the Electric Current to pass through conducting Bodies and render them incandescent

The invention consists in the various devices for accomplishing this object.

Fig 1a


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 1 shows a peice of metallic foil aA. through which the current passes, the top of this foil is secured to the top of the globe holding it at X an extension arm d is arranged so that the contact spring B rests upon it and places tension on the foil the extreme end of B is faced with platina contact is Page 574 made on a platina faced wheel g this wheel is secured to a shaft which secures causes an upward or downward motion without turning by the action of the screw n. M is a rigid stud in which the devices are secured on the shaft of the platina wheel g is a ratchet wheel with two springs2 h & K engaging in its teeth when the screw n is adjusted downward the ratchet and wheel g is rotated about 1/16 of an inch thus bringing clean platina for contact purposes every time the lamp is used with the wheel ½ an inch in diameter a fresh surface would be brought to face that on the spring B once daily for 24 days which is increased as we increase the size of the wheel, c is a small spring attached either to the spring B or to the frame of the instrument the object of this spring is to keep the foil A stretched when the spring B comes in contact with the wheel g

Fig 2


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 2 shows a resistance R inserted in the circuit when the foil A is thrown out by the expansion acting on the lever L to seperate it from the spring c.

Fig 3


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 3 shows in place of a resistance R a second foil Page 575

Fig 4


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 4 shows a device for lessening the spark when the foil A expands and brings the points together the battery X acts to send a current through A in the opposite direction to the main current

Fig 5


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

In fig 5 C is a chalk cylinder 1 & 2 are springs3 connected to it between the springs is the foil A X is a cylinder containing a regulating wire n this wire short circuits itself as well as the foil A whenb the temperature approaches the melting point

Fig 64


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

In fig 6 the short circuiting lever is worked by tensionb” the expansion of the spiral serving to bring the lever around to the short circuiting point

Fig 75


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

In fig 7 a rod s of silver placed in close proximity to the foil A cools Ac when it expands to such an extent that it bows out and touches the silver Page 576

Fig 86


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

In fig 8 A is the foil d a lever with a pad at c closing the orifice of the tube m through which a draft of air endeavors to pass when the foil expands to a certain degree the pad at c leaves the tube m and a draft of air passing to a instantly cools it by radiation

Fig 9


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

In fig 9 a double spiral is used to give light and a single wire for regulation

Fig 10


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

In fig 10 a carbon rod A dips in a molten mass of metal X in the carbon block B this gives brilliant incandescence, a carbon rod A should be fed downwards by proper mechanisms as it wastes away

Fig 11


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 11 shows two carbons 1 & 2 placed within a short distance of each other and in contacts at their ends when no current Page 577 passes. X is a platinum rodd inclosed in the circuit and secured to the carbon 2 when the current passes X expands and with the assistance of the spring s seperate the carbons and establishes the arc

Fig 12


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 12 shows the expansion of a spring X by the heat of the arc

Fig 13


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 13 shows double expansion wires A & B

Fig 14


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 14 shows two carbons 1 & 2 working on torsion wires the arc being maintained by repulsion

Fig 15


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 15 shows a foil for incandescence on a peice of chalk it is ribbed in the center for strength Page 578

Fig 16


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 17


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 18


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 16–17 & 18 are similar

Fig 19


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 19 A is the foil B a weight short circuit takes place in a cup of mercury X

Fig 207


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

In fig 20 several levers 8 are 1 2 & 3 are used to make contact should one fail the others connecting should all fail to connect with 4 and short circuit the foil it would still be saved by the stirrup 8 leaving the levers and the current passing through spring 7 and resistance R 5 is the adjusting screw for the contact 4.6 is a mercury cup to insure contact together of all the levers

Fig 219


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

In fig 21 spring replaces the levers of fig 20 Page 579

Fig 22


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

In fig 22 the object is the same as in fig 1 but rotation of the platina wheel is obtained by the expansion of the Zinc rod X. every time the foil becomes incandescent a click in the rod engaging in the ratchet on the platina wheel.

Fig 23


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 23 shows thec ordinary regulator with the addition of a lamp and wick which assists the incandescence of the foil and which for some purposes is a useful adjunct

Fig 24


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 25


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 26


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 24–25 & 26 shows methods of connecting the spiral ein a magneto electric circuit Page 580

Fig 27


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 28


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 27 & 28 shows methods of connecting several regulators in 27 they are connected for intensity in 28 for quantity10

Df (copy), NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 997:77 (TAEM 3:389). Written by William Carman. aDrawings together on three separate pages. bObscured overwritten letters. c”cools A” interlined above. d”rod” interlined above. ‘Interlined above.

1. Figures 4–23 and 27–28 were included in Edison’s Caveat 83, filed 25 October 1878 (Edison Caveat 83). Drawings related to this draft caveat are in Vol. 16:98–101, 104–5, 107–9, 111–13, 115 and NS-78-005, both Lab. (TAEM 4:561–64, 567–69, 571–73, 575; 7:819–26). Many of the figures in the draft caveat contain part labels that are not discussed in the text.

2. Above “M” and to the left and right respectively.

3. Located to the right and left of “A,” which is at the top of the drawing.

4. Text is “mercury.”

5. Text is “Platinum—foil bows out touches S—cools.” Another version of this drawing is in NS-78-005, Lab. ( TAEM 7:825) with the following description: “Platinum wire X heated to incandescence by current bows outwardly toward S & touches it when it reaches a certain temperature thus cooling it.” The platinum, wire or foil is the thin line in the center of the lamp, the silver is the thicker line to the right.

6. Text is “draft air,” the foil is unlabeled.

7. Edison’s U.S. Patent 218, 866 includes this design.

8. At left center.

Charles Batchelor’s measured drawing ofa foil-lamp design.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Methods of attaching platina foil burners.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

9. On 3 October, Charles Batchelor made a measured drawing of a lamp that appears similar in design to those shown in figures 20 and 21 Page 581 and, on the same page as another drawing of a similar lamp, he illustrated various methods of fastening the platina foil. Edison’s U.S. Patent 218, 866 includes this design. Vol. 4:100–1, Lab. (TAEM 4:563–64).

10. Cf. Doc. 1098.

  • To George Bliss

[Menlo Park,] Oct9[i87]8

Dear Sir

Genl Stager informs me that the W.E. Mfg Co have plenty of pens in stock but that they will not let them go except for cash and complains that you are behind in payments and that is the whole trouble— I hope this can be fixed up otherwise the business is ruined— Puskas will telegraph me on the 28th of this month $8,0001 of which deducting some expenses I suppose 1/9 will be yours.2 Will notify you when it is rec’d and you can draw at sight. Very Truly

T. A. Edison G[riffin]

L (letterpress copy), NjWOE, Lbk. 3:399 (TAEM 28:833). Written by Stockton Griffin.

1. See Doc. 1449 n. 1.

2. As per the terms of their agreement of 17 December 1877. Kellow (TAEM 28:1195).

  • To Hilborne Roosevelt

[Menlo Park,] Oct9[187]8

Dear Sir

I understand that the President of the Phono Co1 says that I am not entitled to any royalty on phono exhibitions.2 I should like to be informed of this decision officially. 3 Very Truly

T. A. Edison G[riffin]

L (letterpress copy), NjWOE, Lbk. 3:398 (TAEM 28:832). Written by Stockton Griffin.

1. Gardiner Hubbard. Although William Applebaugh had been named president when the Edison Speaking Phonograph Co. was incorporated, the functional authority always was Hubbard’s and he soon assumed the title. Doc. 1305 n. 2; Eustis Hubbard to Gardiner Hubbard, 17 Sept. 1878, Box 1205, NjWAT.

2. No inquiry from Edison nor any response to this effect has been found. The contracts binding the various exhibitors of phonographs to pay royalties to the company terminated on 1 October 1878, and Edison knew that by late September several thousands of dollars had been received, but the company’s 8 October royalty report to him (Doc. 1484) made no reference to that revenue. Page 582

3. Apparently Edison addressed this to Hilborne Roosevelt because he had suggested to Edison in September that various changes be made in the Edison Speaking Phonograph Co. as well as in the disposition of the rights to use the phonograph in toys. Both Edward Johnson and Uriah Painter had urged Edison to discuss the matter with them before trying to settle anything with Roosevelt. Roosevelt indicated the next day that he thought it proper that Edison get a share of the company’s exhibition royalties, and the following day he proposed alterations in the company’s contract with Edison to make that explicit. Eventually Edison was credited with $1, 031.91, a twenty percent share of the net royalties of $5, 159.55. Johnson to TAE, 21 Sept. 1878; Painter to TAE, 26 Sept. 1878; Roosevelt to TAE, 10 and 11 Oct. 1878; Edison Speaking Phonograph Co. royalty statement for December 1878; all DF (TAEM 19:123, 125, 128, 130, 204).

  • To Henry Morton

Menlo Park, N.J., Oct. 10, 1878.

Dear Sir:—

Your favor of the 9th has just been received.1 The Sun article was somewhat exaggerated. 2 But it is safe to say that I have some new ideas in regard to the electric light, more especially relating to the infinite subdivision of the same. I expect to put in at least 6 months solid work perfecting it. Am just ordering a 50 H.P. engine for this line of experiment.3

I do not think I will enter the lecture field for several years.—Can’t spare the time.—and have no inclination that way.4 Very truly yours,

T. A. Edison, G[riffin].

PL, NjWOE, Lit., Edison Electric Light Co. v. U.S. Electric Lighting Co., Defendant’s Exhibit Edison-Morton Letter (TAEM47:884).

1. Morton’s letter is in DF (TAEM 17:690).

2. This refers to Doc. 1439. In his 9 October letter (see note 1), Morton had told Edison that “so many people ask me about it that I will take the liberty of inquiring if you really have hit upon some new idea in connection with the electric light, or if the Sun article was only ‘taffy.’” A week later, Morton gave a lecture on the electric light to the American Gaslight Association during which he stated: “In the subdivision, as gas is now used, there is not even the prospect of anything being done. Even Mr. Edison says not for some years to come.” “Gas and Electricity,” New York Herald, 18 Oct. 1878, Cat. 1240, item 958, Batchelor (TAEM 94:319); Morton 1879.

3. See Doc. 1500 n. 1.

4. In his 9 October letter (see note 1), Morton told Edison that a Mr. Pugh wanted Edison to lecture. Pugh subsequently engaged George Barker (see Doc. 1582 n. 4).

  • From George Barker

Philadelphia, Oct. 10, 1878.

My dear Edison:—

On looking up the subject of titanium, I find that it has never been” obtained except in the form of powder; in which form the dealers in rare chemicals sell it; as you will see by the catalogues of Trommsdorff, Schuchhardt, and Karlbaum which I have mailed you today.1 Since it decomposes water at 500o, it must take fire and burn to oxide at a red heat or less. I think silicon is better than titanium, for light. As to Rutile, there is a mineral dealer here who I think would supply you. If you say so I will get the price from him. If you only want a small quantity, I think you had better buy the titanic acid already made. This can be converted into titanic tetrachloride, and the vapor of this passed over heated sodium to obtain the metallic titanium.

I sent you yesterday an ounce bottle of chemically pure oxalate of cerium, precipitated from an acid solution by oxealic acid. If you want more, I can send you another bottle. I would like to know if you find it any better for your purpose than the commercial oxalate, which contains Di 2 and La.

How does your new light come on? Mr. Bentley called me on the telephone yesterday and introduced me to a Mr. Wise3 of the Permanent Exhibition here, who told me that Brush’s machines4 were not giving satisfaction, and he desired to know about your invention. I told him your expectation was to make it public in a few weeks and that you had promised it to me for my lecture on Nov. 14th. I told him he ought to go over to N.Y. to the American Institute and see how Wallace’s machines worked lighting up that building. By the way you were over there last night I heard. What success has Wallace in lighting up? I believe his machine is the best in this country yet and I should like to see a comparative test made between that and the Siemens machine.5

Speaking of Wallace, I felt a little sorry for him when you told me the arrangements you had made for putting your new light on the market. I wish you had let him know of the plan, so that he could have gone into the company on equal terms with the men whose names you gave me. He is a capital fellow and an honest man, and I should like to have him have a chance in your new method of lighting.

So soon as you can spare one, I hope you will send me one of the new lights to experiment with with my Gramme machine6 in preparation for my lecture. You know I am expecting you and Bachelor over to help me show that new light. Page 584

Can you tell me where the cap is for the cone of the tasimeter I have? You had it in your bag.

I enclose some papers of yours I had & a letter which came to St. L. after you left.7 Draper would like your Tasimeter paper in the form of a report to him. 8 May I make the change? Ask Bachelor to send me these things soon. With best wishes Cordially yours

George F. Barker.

Dont forget the cartes-de-visite.

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:205). aObscured overwritten letters.

1. The catalogs of Theodore Schuchardt of Gôrlitz, C. A. F. Kohlbaum of Berlin, and H. Trommsdorff of Erfurt are pasted into Cat. 30, 102, Scraps. (TAEM 27:955, 957, 961).

2. Didymium, a name used to describe a mix of rare earth compounds.

3. Unidentified.

The Charles Brush dynamo design marketed in 1878.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

4. This dynamo was designed by Charles Brush and manufactured by the Telegraph Supply Co. of Cleveland. According to Prescott 1878c (423–25), there were two significant features that distinguished the Brush dynamo from other machines. The first of these was the design of the armature and its windings. Unlike many of its contemporaries, the Brush ring armature was grooved, the number of grooves differing according to the purpose for which the machine was designed. The insulated copper wire used for the winding was placed in some of these grooves. This allowed the projecting portions of the armature to revolve very close to the poles of the magnets, thus utilizing more of the magnets’ inductive force. Other, empty grooves exposed more of the armature surface to the air, more readily dissipating the heat developed in operation. The second design difference involved the manner of connecting the armature coils to the commutator so as to prevent those not in contact from “affording a path to divert the current generated in the active sections” (Prescott 1878c, 425). The Franklin Institute committee on dynamos had recommended the smaller Brush machine as “admirably Page 585 adapted to the production of intense currents, and [it] has the advantage of being made to furnish currents of widely varying electromotive force” (Prescott 1879, 47 2). They were also impressed by the ease with which it could be maintained and repaired.

A Siemens/ von Hefner-Alteneck dynamo from this period.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

A Gramme dynamo from this time.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

5. This dynamo was manufactured by the Siemens brothers’ firms in Germany and England. Werner Siemens devised the first significant improvement in the design of generator armatures in 1857, when he introduced the shuttle armature to replace the disk armatures used in most machines to that time. Ten years later, he also coined the term dynamo-electric machine (later shortened to dynamo) for self-exciting electric generators. In a dynamo, the turning of the armature between the poles of the machine’s electromagnet induces a small current in the armature coils. In a positive feedback loop, this current circulates through the field electromagnets, increasing the magnetic field in which the armature turns, increasing the induced current, increasing the magnetic field, and so on. This process continues until the core of the electromagnet is magnetically saturated and the dynamo reaches its full output. Werner’s brother William, head of the London firm Siemens Bros., also conducted important researches on the efficiency of dynamo machines and contributed to the development of the Siemens design. The Siemens dynamo was further improved with the development of the drum armature introduced in 1873 by Friedrich von Hefner-Alteneck, chief engineer at the factory of the German firm Siemens and Halske. This armature was found to be highly efficient and became the basis for most modern designs. King 1962c, 369–79; Thompson 1886, 152–56; Thompson 1902, 11, 13–15.

6. Frenchman Zénobe Gramme developed a ring-armature dynamo in 1870 that became the first commercially successful machine and the most widely used by mid-1878. At that time it was considered the most efficient of all dynamos. King 1962c, 379–91; Thompson 1886, 115–18.

7. Unidentified.

8. Doc. 1401.

  • From Grosvenor Lowrey

Tarry town Oct 10th 1878a

My Dear Edison:

Mr Banker has been ill for two days this week and Mr Twombly’s occupation and my own engagements have prevented us from coming together. But I have fixed Saturday as a day for meeting to organize a company and pay in the first $30 000 subscription. If I need you on that day I will telegraph you. If you need money send over a messenger, first telegraphing the amount which you will require.

Mr Carr1 and Mr Depew called on me a few days since. I told them I thought we were not yet ready to entertain proposals for the foreign patents. That it was your design to perfect the light with all the appurtenances here and when that was done you would be ready to name a price for foreign countries. Page 586

They seemed entirely satisfied with this, especially as I assured them that they should have fair notice when we were ready and an opportunity to compete with others.

I should like to have a word from you from time to time letting me know how you progress.

Are the foreign patents applied for? Does Mr Serrel look after all these things for you.

Our friends Banker, Edson and Twombly appear quite content with their respective interests. I think nature has formed Mr Twombly to want a little more always, but with this not uncommon defect I am disposed to like him and find good in him.

With the English patents I think we can get money enough not only to set you up forever but to enable you at once if you desire to build and formally endow a working laboratory such as the world needs and has never seen. I should like immensely to see your name given to a place of that sort, which while conducted as nearly as possible on self supporting principles would give a fair opportunity for indigent but ingenious men to have their ideas exploited or exploded as the case might be. Do not you think that might be made a very useful institution. I presume it would be very difficult to arrange so as to suit every-body and perhaps the notion is only whimsical Very truly yours

G. P. Lowrey

LS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:33). Letterhead of Porter, Lowrey, Soren & Stone, Attorneys & Counsellors at Law. a“187” preprinted.

1. Possibly Col. Lewis Carr, whom Stockton Griffin telegraphed about arranging a visit to Menlo Park on 8 October and who tried to arrange an appointment with Griffin in New York at the beginning of November. Griffin to Carr, 8 Oct. 1878; Carr to Griffin, 1 Nov. 1878; both DF (TAEM 16:201, 368).

  • Technical Note: Electric Lighting

[Menlo Park,] Oct 10 78

Electric Light Experiment1

1 Fix the Mercury guage and Air Pump2a

2 Arrange a piece of sheet platina ¼ wide and very thin 1/5000 in the glass bulb, with proper bindpost for large wire that we may try the effects of a partial or whole vacuum on radiation from the spiralb 〈O.K.〉c Page 587

2 Make 2 large cells consisting of Make 2 platina strips ⅛ wide one & the other ¼ wide both same length & having same resistance on Bradley strap 4 3 with large C and H cell4 One foil being twice as thin as other arrange the 4 C H cells to heat either to redness but not to incandescence These foils to be without regulators and arranged so that glass tubes can be placed over them, which tubes are air tight at top and ground on bottom so that there is no leaakage at bot of air good solid connections required 〈OK started〉5d

The idea is to ascertain if we do not gain by increased light by increased surfaced without alteration of resistance and also to ascertain if the radiation nullifies the effect of increased surface

(3) Make 2 lamps without regulators same as above with ¼ inch foils, very thin, one coiled in cylindrical form and the other straight the edges of cylinder not lapping but butted with smallest crack possiblea 〈OK started〉6d

(4) Piece of Platina ¼ in wide to fit double pillar machine rolled if possible 1/10000 inch thick and set in machine.3

(5) On one of the old style lamp regulators I want a platina point on lever ⅜ long and on the screw a brass cup containing Mercury in which I place two or three drops of glycerine 〈OK〉7d

“Old-style”glycerine lamp regulator.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

(6) Make With one of the machines made with ⅛ inch foil very thin arranged with a standard candle to see the p. c. of loss with thick and thin tubes of glass over it, the idea being that while glass does not obstruct light in the same ratio as radiant heat hence there may be a gain in amount of light by employing thicker bulbs Arra

() Arrange on a vertical revolving shaft at 300 per min. a lamp one of old style spirals with regulator securely clamped to the shaft with two heavy rings & heavye connection springs for conveying the current to lamp; idea being to increase quantity of light & diminishing its intensity the spiral must describe a 2 in[ch] circle.8a

Old-regulator lamp to revolve on shaft.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Make two induction coils of No 3 primary and 2 layers; and No 8 Secondary 8 layers cores 3 inch diameter 12 inch long cast iron, also cast iron backs placed on bases with bindposts for heavy wires— 9

T A Edison
J Kruesi
Wm Carman
Chas Batchelor
M. N. Force
G E Carman

Page 588

X, NjWOE, Lab., Vol. 16:126, 127, 125 (TAEM 4:582–83). Written by Charles Batchelor; document multiply signed and dated. aFollowed by centered horizontal line. bFollowed by centered horizontal double line. cWritten by Batchelor, underlined twice. dWritten by Batchelor. ‘Interlined above.

1. These notes were copied by Batchelor into a notebook that was later disbound; possibly the missing Experimental Researches Vol. 3 (see TAEM 3:277). The copy was made on 22 October and titled “E. ‘Light’ Experiments to be tried” (Vol. 16:154–55, 177, Lab. [TAEM 4:604–6, 622]). They are probably copies of Edison’s original notes, which are no longer extant (see Doc. 1543 n. 2).

2. Edison acquired the vacuum pump in January 1875 and had used it in September 1877 for his first incandescent lamp experiments. PN-75-01-05, Accts. (TAEM 20:31); TAEB 3:547 n. 2.

3. This refers to resistance coil No. 4, a strip of sheet copper, that was used with the Bradley galvanometer to measure the resistance of a conductor. Bradley 1872, 8.

4. Probably the large capacity bichromate of potash batteries made by Condit, Hanson & Van Winkle which Edison had used during his 1877 electric light experiments. See App. 2.

Experimental lamp for thin foil burners.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

5. On 23 October, Batchelor gave John Kruesi instructions to make these two lamps and provided a sketch to guide him. Vol. 16:157, Lab. (TAEM 4:608).

6. On 23 October, Batchelor gave Kruesi instructions to make these lamps (NS-78-005, Lab. [TAEM 7:841]). On 3 November, he annotated his 22 October version of this note (see note 1 above) with the comment: “Apparently great difference—coiled-one gives most light. More noticeable on the little Weston machine. The coiled-one measured .07 ohms and the flat one .11 ohms.”

7. On 27 October, Batchelor gave Kruesi a sketch and instructions for making this lamp. The same sketch appeared in the 22 October version of this note (see note 1). Vol. 16:167, Lab. (TAEM 4:616).

8. On 27 October, Batchelor gave Kruesi a sketch and instructions for making this lamp. He indicated that the lamp should “revolve on a Page 589 shaft 1 inch out of centre upright and carry connnections to it by springs (heavy) one (the top) collar insulated & connected to regulator lever— Put this up on table upstairs and set running from shaft underneath.” Vol. 16:168, Lab. (TAEM 4:616).

9. In his 22 October version of this note (see note 1), Batchelor provided a drawing and indicated, “We decide to make this in this manner. Cores with closed armatures at each end.”

Experimental induction coil drawn by Charles Batchelor.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

  • From George Prescott

New York, October 11, 1878a

Friend Edison

We are about to order an additional lot of telephone receivers, but before doing so would like to know what progress you are making with your new receiver. If you are likely to have it out soon it would be better for us to wait for it, or to order a small lot to cover our immediate wants.

My new chapter on Electric Light is nearly completed. If you wish me to say anything about your work in this direction let me know what, as soon as you can, because I want to finish the chapter, and electrotype it before going on to your experiments in telephonic matters etc. 1

I ordered your material as requested and sent you cuts of tasimeter which I presume you duly received.2

Shall I assign half of my quadruplex patent to you, according to agreement of August 19, 1874, or shall I assign the whole of it to the Company. I will do as you wish.3

Dr Nicholson4 was here yesterday, and says he will show who invented the quadruplex first when he gets before the Patent Office.5 Yours truly

Geo. B. Prescott

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:221). Letterhead of Western Union Telegraph Co., George Prescott, Electrician. a”New York,” and “187” preprinted.

1. On 13 November, Prescott wrote again to indicate that he would send Edison “the closing pages of my new chapter on electric light in a few days, and would be glad to have you carefully look over what I have said about your investigations, and such alterations or corrections as you desire to make I shall insert with pleasure. Should you desire to have your invention described at any future time I will keep the pages of the book unbound, and insert your matter in a separate chapter.” Prescott apparently sent this chaper on 19 November and Edison returned it the following day. Prescott to TAE, 13 and 19 Nov. 1878, DF ( TAEM 17:240; 16:450).

This appeared as Chapter 14 in Prescott 1879. It followed the chapter from Prescott 1878c on electric lighting and preceded a new chapter Page 590 on “Edison’s Recent Telephonic and Acoustic Inventions.” As in the first electric light chapter, most of the discussion concerned arc lighting and generators, but there was some discussion of incandescent lighting that included a notice of Edison’s British Patent 4, 226, filed 23 October 1878. Discussing Edison’s work, Prescott noted his claim to have developed a method of preventing the wire from fusing

by so applying a small bar that it will expand the instant the wire reaches within a few degrees of the fusing point, and intercept the flow of the current through the wire sufficiently to prevent fusing.

This automatic arrangement secures, it is said, an even temperature in the wire or thin strip of platinum, and consequently a steady glow of pure light. If this is done economically, and the practical limit of the subdivision is sufficiently extended, it is obvious that a marked advance has been made in artificial illumination. Actual trial, however, must determine whether the action of the automatic bar regulator will do all that is claimed for it. [Prescott 1879, 507–8]

Prescott also distinguished Edison’s incandescent light regulator from those of Moses Farmer and William Siemens by noting that “in both of the latter it is the current which is regulated, while in the former it is the temperature of the incandescent substance, each lamp being entirely independent of the strength of current above a certain amount, and each also independent of the other” (p. 508).

2. Six tasimeter illustrations appeared in a section titled “The Micro-Tasimeter” in the chapter on “Edison’s Recent Telephonic and Acoustic Inventions” in Prescott 1879 (551—58).

3. Prescott assigned half of his U.S. Patent 190, 898 to Edison. Prescott to TAE, 17 Oct. 1878; patent assignment, 16 Oct. 1878; both DF (TAEM 19:557–58).

4. Dr. Henry C. Nicholson (b. 1824) was a Kenton County, Ky., physician whose interest in electricity led him to make experiments on telegraphy. As early as 1847 he had experimented with a printing telegraph using funds provided by American telegraph entrepreneur Henry O’Rielly. He conceived a multiple telegraph around 1867 and began experiments along this line in 1870. In 1871 and again in 1873 he communicated his ideas to Western Union president William Orton and company electrician George Prescott. Nicholson also demonstrated a system at the Cincinnati Exposition in 1873. Nicholson’s testimony, Nicholson v. Edison.

5. After reading an account of Edison’s and Prescott’s work on quadruplex telegraphy in the 15 July 1874 issue of the Journal of the Telegraph,, Nicholson applied for a patent. He filed his application on 14 October 1874; Edison had filed his on 1 September (Doc. 472). Action on the applications was suspended in view of a probable interference on 31 December 1874 (see TAEB 3:379 n. 4). Nicholson believed that Edison and Prescott had adopted ideas communicated in his letters to Western Union, and this became the basis of his claims in the patent interference. The proceedings were delayed by other Patent Office and court actions; it officially began in 1878, the case was not resolved until 1885, and Edison’s patent on the core of the quadruplex was not finally Page 591 granted until 1892. To protect its rights to quadruplex telegraphy, Western Union had entered into negotiations with Nicholson in January 1875 for control of his invention, concluding an agreement on 12 February 1875. Nicholson’s testimony, Nicholson v. Edison; Commissioner of Patents to TAE, 16 May 1892, Pat. App. 480, 567; Orton to Anson Stager, 23 Jan. and 3 and 9 Feb. 1875, LBO 14:145–49, 171–77, 189–92; Nicholson to Western Union, 16 Dec. 1889, C. L. Buckingham Correspondence File, Box 12, WU Coll.

  • From Hilborne Roosevelt

New York Oct 11 1878a

My dear Edison

I am sorry not to have been able to explain the state of the different casses—lb I have nearly fixed the Toy business as you see but Russell will not deal with the Phono Co but only with me but is willing for me to arrange withb the Phono Co myself and I propose forb them to operate it having my half interest or the profits arising therefrom— In the matter of our own contract I have made the alterations we spoke of which I hope will meet your views. You see I put in the Exhibition royalty at the same time to close that up fairly to you— I think I can arrang with Russell on the basis I send— I am very anxiousb to restore peace in our camp and increase the value of our stock &c— Yours truly

Hilborne L Roosevelt.

I enclose two letters’b for you to send me after copying in your letterbook, if they are all right—2 pleaseb send at once as there has been much delay with the Toys already HLR

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 19:130). Letterhead of Hilbourne Roosevelt. a”New York” and “187” preprinted. bObscured overwritten letters.

1. Roosevelt is apparently referring to proposed changes in Edison’s agreement with the Edison Speaking Phonograph Co. See Doc. 1487 n. 3.

2. This postscript was probably written the following day. One of the enclosures was Roosevelt’s version of his agreement with Edison regarding the toy phonograph contract (draft dated 12 Oct. 1878, DF [ TAEM 19:131]). This was copied by Edison with changes (Doc. 1499). The other enclosure may be similar to the copy made by Stockton Griffin of an Edison letter to Roosevelt, dated 14 October, regarding proposed changes in Edison’s agreement of 30 January (Doc. 1190). This letter indicated that Edison would release the parties to that agreement from their obligation to raise $50,000 within one year of the contract as long as they retained $100,000 capital stock in the treasury in order to carry on the business of the company. In return they would release Edison from any obligation to repay $8,000 if a standard machine was not developed within a year of the contract. Edison would Page 592 also be guaranteed twenty percent of the phonograph exhibition receipts. It is not known if this letter was sent (DF [TAEM 19:133]).

  • From Grosvenor Lowrey

New York, Oct 12th 1878a

My dear Edison

Please be at my office at 2 o’clock on Monday—1 At that I expect to be ready to place $30,000 at your service for developing the light. At that time I will have the contract which I propose ready—2 I have drawn it hastily & enclose you a copy3 to be examined by you before we meet— I think on the whole you should see me & bring back the paper at twelve o’clock, and I can then have it re-written before 2 o’clock at which time I will fix a meeting to organize the Company and complete everything—4 I got in very late this afternoon & found Mr Griffin just going— He assures me that you do not need the $1240, for bills this afternoon & that Monday will do— If you needed it I would, although it is three o’clock, send out & get the greenbacks— I could give you a check but that would do you no good so late5

Another bid for the foreign patents has just come to me from the largest Banking House here— I told them that the longest pole would knock the persimmon, & I explained to them that they must compete with Carr, Depew and all others fairly—

The right way is to perfect the <thing here and then—we shall see— I don’t dare tell you how much I propose to ask downb, besides retaining royalties, interest &c Yrs tly

G. P. Lowrey

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:36). Letterhead of Porter, Lowrey, Soren & Stone, Attorneys & Counsellors at Law. a“New York,” and “187” preprinted. Interlined above.

1. That is, Oct. 14. Lowrey’s firm, Porter, Lowrey, Soren, & Stone, was located in Drexel, Morgan & Co.’s building at 3 Broad St. (where it meets Wall Street), which would soon become the address of the Edison Electric Light Co.

2. Lowrey probably refers to Doc. 1576, Edison’s 15 November agreement with the Edison Electric Light Co.

3. Not found.

4. The Edison Electric Light Co. was incorporated on 16 October to “own, manufacture, operate and license the use of various apparatus used in producing light, heat or power by electricity.” The thirteen incorporators included Edison, several members of Lowrey’s law firm, Tracy Edson, James Banker, Norvin Green, Robert Cutting, Jr., Egisto Page 593 Fabbri, and Nathan Miller. The capital stock was set at $300,000. Articles of Incorporation, DF (TAEM 18:38).

An accounting of money received and expended by Lowrey on “Electric Light Matter” indicates that he received $4,000 from Drexel, Morgan & Co. on 12 October; $1,000 from Fabbri & Chauncey, $4, 200 from Edson, $1, 400 from Banker, $2, 600 from Cutting, and $5,000 from Miller on 14 October; and $1, 800 from Green on 18 October. This constituted two-thirds of the $30,000 to be paid Edison, with the rest of the money probably contributed by the members of Lowrey’s law firm. Edison Electric Light Co. Statement Book, Accts. (TAEM 88:427); on Fabbri and the firm of Fabbri & Chauncey, see Doc. 1504 n. 4.

5. On 7 October, Lemuel Serrell had written Edison that he needed an additional $245 for electric light patents. At the bottom of this letter Edison listed this and other expenses amounting to $1, 240 and asked Griffin to get the money from Lowrey (DF [TAEM 18:772]). On Monday, 14 October, Lowrey paid out this amount in the form of four checks; $245 to Serrell for the patent expenses, $750 to Wallace & Sons for the new dynamo, $117 to the jeweller Rother for the purchase of iridium, and $128 for the purchase of chemicals and other materials (Edison Electric Light Co. Statement Book, Accts. [TAEM 88:427]).

  • Technical Note: Telephony

[Menlo Park,] Oct 13th 1878

Edisons New Telephone Receiver Bracket for Same1


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Coil partitioned off on inside

T A Edison
Chas. P. Edison
J Kruesi
Chas Batchelor
M N Force
G E. Carman

Page 594

X, NjWOE, Lab., Vol. 18:35 (TAEM 4:1070). Written by Batchelor.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

1. Text is “Transmitter” and “Listen.” Charles Edison began designing telephone wall brackets on 7 October. Over the next few days he proposed several alternative designs for brackets, including some that were similar to the Phelps shelf-bracket (see Doc. 1394). In most of these drawings the transmitter was placed on an extension arm rather than being placed in the cabinet. Charley initially showed a listening tube for the receiver as in the Partrick & Carter telephones (see Docs. 1355 and 1388), but on 10 October, probably to take advantage of the electromotograph receiver’s loud-speaking quality, he proposed replacing the listening tube with a horn. Drawings of 13 October also show a horn rather than a listening tube. A measured drawing suggests that a unit like the 10 October design was actually made. Vol. 18:23–27, 30–33, 35–37; NS-78-011; all Lab. (TAEM 4:1061–69, 1071–72; 7:930).

  • Equipment Specification: Telephony

[Menlo Park, c. October 13, 1878]1

Mr Kruesi

Will you start Moffatt2 on this box. You will see that the front is hinged That holds the transmitter I will be there soon


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Will you also sketch out for Hense3 a chalk holder for the Motograph like this


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Make the chalks so that they can take them off and put another something same as the one I have drawn for the other one only not so wide

B[atchelor]
TAE
J Kruesi
M N Force

X, NjWOE, Lab., Vol. 18:47 (TAEM 4:1081). Written by Charles Batchelor. Page 595

1. Kruesi and Force signed Kruesi’s note: “Electro motograph receiver previous to Oct 21st 1878.” What may be a measured drawing of this design, labeled “Edison’s Carbo-Chalk Telephone,” is dated 13 October (Vol. 18:39, Lab. [TAEM 4:1075]). The design appears to be intended to ensure that users properly switched between transmitter and receiver. The front of the box containing the transmitter apparently had to be swung down in order to hear the receiver and then swung back up to speak. Another design, dated 17 October and labeled “Carbo-Chalk Telephone,” also appears to have been intended to overcome the switching problem. It was made by George Jackson during the last week of October (Vol. 18:42–44, Lab. [TAEM 4:1077–78]; time sheet, DF [TAEM 17:767]). The problem of switching is apparent in other designs from around this date. On 14 October, for example, Charles Edison drew several arrangements for automatic switches on one of which Batchelor noted that users “wont always put tube up & will take it down before they call” (Vol. 18:40–41, Lab. [TAEM 4:1076]).

2. Charles Moffat joined the staff at the end of September and did carpentry and other work around the laboratory. His name appears as Moffat in the 1880 census, as Morfitt on time sheets, and as Moffett in Jehl 1937–41, 688. His time sheets indicate that he worked on telephone boxes from 18 October through 1 November (U.S. Bureau of the Census 1970, roll 790; DF [TAEM 17:731, 741, 749, 759, 768]). For other telephone box arrangements made during October see Vol. 18:46, 48, 121, Lab. ( TAEM 4:1080, 1082, 1151).

3. Rudolph Hense joined the staff on 2 October. He was apparently a machinist and worked on electric light and telephone experiments. His time sheets indicate that he worked on electromotographs throughout the month of October. DF (TAEM 17:729, 738, 747, 756, 766).

  • To George Gouraud

Menlo Park N.J. Oct 14. 781

My Dear Gouraud

Rec’d Adams Cable dispatch tonight about Bell people putting on injunction on our receivers with magnet.2 I cannot see how his patent can be maintained because the instrument as shown in his patent is not the one he uses, the one in the patent being inoperative.

However it is perhaps best that Bells patent should be sustained because if left open to the public it might damage us: The new receiver removes all question of patent rights in any country. I have several here in operation but am waiting to see if there are any defects before sending to you— The moment I am satisfied on this point they will go forward— The new receiver is such an enormous advance in telegraphy that you will be astonished— Batchelor last night heard whispering when 15 feet distant from the receiver. Ordinary conversation comes out about as loud as originally spoken, and but one cell Page 596 of callaud battery is required— In fact with the carbon transmitter and this receiver we have control of Telephony for the future, so be careful.

Electric Light. You know I telegraphed you that I had put you in with some strong parties here on light—3 So you will be counted in but I can make no arrangements as I am committed to parties here. In this country W. H. Vanderbilt and friends have taken it advancing $50,000 cash to experiment with and giving me ½ of the stock of the Co besides paying a royalty of $30 000 yearly.4 I am having fine success with the experiments— Am putting in a 50 H. P. engine and lot of electric machines for experimenting—5 British patent was sent last week. 6

Private. Parties after the light in England are J. S. Morgan,7—Reed8 the English naval constructor in connection here with Cauncy Depew and Col Carr, also Emil Erlanger9 Paris (Banker) who cabled— This information is private— Please understand that in any arrangement I make, you are to be in because I consider you as my representative there.

Have rec’d no papers as yet about Telephones— Central System here is a grand success —Very Truly

T. A. Edison G[riffin]

L (letterpress copy), NjWOE, Lbk. 3:408 (TAEM 28:841). Written by Stockton Griffin.

1. A draft, written by Edison, is,in DF (TAEM 16:237).

2. On 12 October, Adams cabled: “Bell company secured an injunction on me and manufacturers, must meet promptly forward all use-full documents.” DF (TAEM 19:939).

3. Doc. 1461.

4. For the actual terms see Doc. 1576.

5. Edison had begun to request pricing and other information about commercial generators in late September. By mid-October, he had received catalogs and price lists from Condit, Hanson & Van Winkle, suppliers of Weston dynamos (see Doc. 1508); the Telegraph Supply Co., suppliers of Brush dynamos; Arnoux & Hochhausen; and Siemens Bros, of London. Theodore Puskas also sent Edison a price list from the Alliance Machine Co. and made inquiries among other Paris electrical manufacturers. Edison’s growing interest in generators was described by a New York Herald reporter who had visited Menlo Park on 11 October. During the visit, Stockton Griffin had shown him the small Wallace generator and explained that “Edison has just purchased a new one... which gives much more power, and in a few days we will have a fifty-horse power engine to work it, as we don’t get power enough with the present one.” Griffin indicated that although “Edison has as yet given but little attention” to the subject of generators, he believed that the “cost can by an improved generator [be] reduced to a much smaller figure.” Arnoux & Hochhausen to TAE, 10 Oct. 1878; Telegraph Supply Page 597 Co. to TAE, 10 Oct. 1878; Siemens Bros, to TAE, 16 Oct. 1878; Puskas to TAE, 25 Oct. 1878; all DF (TAEM 17:943, 945, 952, 996); “Edison’s Electric Light,” New York Herald, 12 Oct. 1878, Cat. 1240, item 949, Batchelor ( TAEM 94:375).

6. British Patent 4, 226 was filed 23 October 1878.

7. International banker Junius Morgan, the father of John Pierpont Morgan, was patriarch of the Morgan banking dynasty. He headed the London firm J. S. Morgan & Co. DAB, s.v. “Morgan, Junius Spencer”; Carosso 1987, chaps. 1–4.

8. Naval architect and constructor Edward Reed. DNB, s.v. “Reed, Sir Edward James.”

9. On 5 October, Edison received a letter from the New York banking firm of Plock & Co. regarding “Our friend Baron Erlanger of the firm of Emile Erlanger & Co, Bankers, of Paris & London” who had sent a telegram asking them to “see Edison ask him communicate with us concerning his electric light improvements.” On the back of this letter, Edison’s secretary, Stockton Griffin, wrote “called at Plocks [October] 7th told him Puskas had sole charge— see him before he commits himself.” DF (TAEM 18:135); Wilson 1879, 1163; see also Doc. 1480 n. 1.

  • To Theodore Puskas

Menlo Park N.J. Oct 14. 781

My Dear Puskas

Money $1900 received by Serrell Saturday.2 Patents go forward next Thursday.3 It will be necessary to take two, if not three sets ofa patents— The first set will contain the germ principle with apparatus that is somewhat imperfect— I cannot delay the patents to perfect the system because once the principle secured I am safe from the effect of publicity— The second set of patents will have to be obtained when the apparatus has reached a stage where several hundred are shown at once in operation and perhaps a final set, but it is possible that only two sets will be necessary. The first set will cost from 12 to $1500.

The arrangement with Vanderbilt is closed up and they have paid in their money—

No one but yourself and I have anything to do with the light on the Continent. Emil Erlanger the Paris banker cabled houseb here to secure light and theyc came here to me. I referred them to you. My impression is that I can make my system a great success so do not commit yourself without submitting terms to me— Very Truly

T. A. Edison G[riffin]

L, HuBPo. Written by Stockton Griffin, a“sets of” added in margin. bInterlined above. ‘Added in margin. Page 598

1. Edison’s draft of this letter is in DF (TAEM 18:143) and a letterbook copy is in Lbk. 3:410 (TAEM 28:843).

2. Puskas had cabled Edison about this on 9 October. After a telegraph exchange with Serrell, Edison replied the same day that Serrell had not yet received the money. DF (TAEM 16:201–3).

3. That is, electric-light patent applications for the continent of Europe, including France, Belgium, Germany, Austria, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and Russia. On 16 October, Lemuel Serrell telegraphed Edison that he wanted to see him regarding electric light matters. Three days later, Edison asked him when “will those foreign papers be ready to sign” to which Serrell replied “Ready Wednesday.” On 22 October, Edison asked Serrell if the papers would be ready for the next day’s steamer as it was “very important that some of them go as Scientific American is going to publish” (on this point see Doc. 1554 n. 2). The applications were apparently sent on Thursday, October 24, with the necessary powers of attorney. Serrell to TAE, 16, 19, 22, and 23 Oct. 1878; TAE to Serrell, 19 and 22 Oct. 1878; Serrell’s bills to Puskas, 8 Nov. 1878; all DF (TAEM 18:774–77, 797–98); see also Doc. 1550.

  • To Hilborne Roosevelt

[Menlo Park,] Oct 14 [i87]8a

My Dear Mr Rosevelt.

You know that Painter and Johnson were the parties who first dealt with me on the Phonograph Matterb and I am in duty bound to ask them if they are satisfied that I should make changes in the contract as proposed.1 For myself I do not see but that it is all right and fair to all but still I should like to submit the revised contract to both Painter & Johnson before doing anything in the matter.

Regarding the Toy contract that is another matter, because I am not under obligations to them in this respect, and I see no reason why you should not personally buy Harris out. But of course if the Phonograph Co claim that the small machine of Harris is not a toy then I have no right to say to you that you may pay Russell ten cents on each Neither have I anything to do with the amount you pay Harris, because that is a private matter between you and him.2I enclose you a letter somewhat changed to see if it will satisfy you and accomplish the object you have in hand. If not I will try and alter it as far as I can with justice to myself. Yours

Thomas A Edison

ENCLOSURE3c

Menlo Park NJ Oct 14, 78a

Hilborne L Roosevelt Dear Sir

In the matter of the Toy contract I am willing you should take one half interest with Mr O Russell on the following conditions. Page 599 You must furnish the necessary capital and take the business management and Mr Russell must assist you as far as possible. There must be no clashing between yourselves and the phonograph Company. I will waive the matter of the payment of $6000 annually as a minimum sum for royalty for two years from the date hereof in consideration of your paying me twenty per cent royalty on the selling price of the toys instead of ten per cent, but at the expiration of the two years the $6000 clause shall again become operative but the royalty shall be reduced to ten per cent, the above to be put in legal shape. Mr Russell is to allow you to take in partners if you so require. The experiments on toys must be paid by yourself4 Very Truly

ALS (letterpress copy), NjWOE, Lbk. 3:404–5, 407 (TAEM 28:837–38, 840). “Circled “C” written above. bObscured overwritten letter. “Enclosure is L (copy) written by Stockton Griffin.

1. This apparently refers to Edison’s 14 October letter to Roosevelt discussed in Doc. 1493 n. 2.

2. In the enclosure below, Edison changed Roosevelt’s draft (see Doc. 1493 n. 2) by removing the terms under which Roosevelt would buy out Harris.

3. Another copy of the enclosure, written by Edison, is in DF (TAEM 19:132).

4. On 16 October, Russell and Charles Harris dissolved their partnership in the toy company. The following day, Roosevelt and Russell first tried unsuccessfully to meet with Edison to finalize arrangements for Roosevelt to take his place. After failing to meet, Roosevelt telegraphed Edison on 25 October, “Will your majesty make an appointment for Russell and myself.” Finally, on 5 November the three men met and signed two additional agreements that waived the annual payment to Edison and changed the terms of the royalty due him, as set out in this letter. They also provided that Roosevelt could join Russell in the toy phonograph contract and allowed him to “associate with him as partners the Edison Speaking Phonograph Company.” Roosevelt to TAE, 17, 24, and 25 Oct. 1878; agreements of 5 Nov. 1878; all DF (TAEM 19:138, 142; 51:768–69).

  • Frotn Edward Hampson

New York, Oct 15 1878a

Dear Sir:

Please do me the favor not to mention the price at which I sold you the Brown Engine, this will be to your interest, as well as mine, in case you wish to dispose of it— $2500 is as low a price as we care to make for this size:1 The man I wrote to about your Hydraulic Press, wants to know how much pressure you want, and the nature of your work, says he can’t tell what you want without more information— The plan for Page 600 your Boiler & Engine House is well along, and expect to call on you with it in a day or two—2 I will call on you again or send some one to see you about the other Pump— I have some nickel plated shafting would like to have you see— I have written to the mason & will see Mr Kinney— 3 Please call when you come to N.Y. Yrs very truly

E. P. Hampson.4

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:480). Letterhead of Edward P. Hampson. a“New York,” and “187” preprinted.

Steam engine made by C. H. Brown & Co.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

1. This was apparently an eighty-horsepower steam engine. Edison had begun making inquiries about steam engines at the beginning of October. On 9 October, William Wallace responded by recommending the engine of C. H. Brown & Co. of Fitchburg, Mass., and the following day Edward Hampson, a New York engineer and agent for Brown & Co., sent Edison a price quote of $1, 600 for a fifty-horsepower engine. Other responses came from George Corliss of the Corliss Steam Engine Co., Wheelock’s Steam Engine Works, and the Buckeye Engine Co., which also submitted a bid. Edison subsequently agreed to have the Buckeye Engine Co. install an eighty-horsepower at their “own expense in order to make a competitive trial or exhibition with the engine which I am putting up.” They would then be free to remove it if he decided not to buy it. The Brown engine was shipped to Edison from Boston where it had been exhibited at the Boston Fair and arrived on 15 November; the Buckeye engine arrived at the end of the month. Corliss to TAE, 3 Oct. 1878; George Gibson to TAE, 7 Oct. 1878; Wallace to TAE, 9 Oct. 1878; Hampson to Stockton Griffin, 10 Oct. 1878; Corliss Engine Co. to TAE, 10 Oct. 1878; Wheelock’s Steam Engine Works to TAE, ii Oct. 1878; Buckeye Engine Co. to TAE, 12, 14, 17 Oct. and 30 Nov. 1878; Hampson to TAE, 9 and 14 Nov. 1878; TAE to Hampson, 14 Nov. 1878; Charles Batchelor to Buckeye Engine Co., 30 Nov. 1878; all DF (TAEM 18:460–68, 471, 477, 482, 522–23, 525–26, 556–57); Batchelor to George Caldwell, 23 Oct. 1878; TAE to Buckeye Engine Co., 29 Oct. 1878; Lbk. 3:445, 458 (TAEM 28:874, 884).

2. The boiler and engine house were built at one end of a new brick machine shop. The entire structure was designed by Babcock & Wilcox, who also supplied the boiler. The Babcock and Wilcox elevation and cross-section drawings for the building are in Pretzer 1989, 54–55. Babcock Page 601 & Wilcox specification for boiler, 12 Oct. 1878; Babcock & Wilcox to TAE, 4 Nov. 1878; both DF (TAEM 18:572, 513).

3. Unidentified.

4. According to his letterhead, Edward Hampson sold “steam engines and boilers, wood and iron working machinery, saw mills, grain mills, hoisting engines, etc.” His business was located at 91 Liberty St. in New York City.

  • From Norman Lockyer

[London,] Octr 15 [1878]

My dear Edison,

I was so sorry to miss you after your return to NY. Why did you not come to the century?1 One may elapse before we meet unless you are very good .

Thanks for the cuts for Nature2 but I want you to let Nature have the first say about your things & not almost the last! What in thunder is this new gas arrangement of yours? I have just bought some gas shares but I am prepared to go in for one universal bust & explosion in Nature if you will only let us talk about it in time.

Have not received the tasimeter3

The Museum here has not received your first phonograph4

We are both gaping for the fulfillment of your promise.

Now please send me all your novelties while they are red hot likewise a photograph of you like the one you gave the crafty Fox. Believe me Ever faithfully yours

J Norman Lockyer

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:239).

1. On the afternoon of 28 August, Edwin Fox had telegraphed Edison that Lockyer was sailing for London the next morning and wanted to see Edison at the Century Club where he was spending the evening as Henry Draper's guest. Griffin promptly relayed this message to Edison, who was at the Edison Speaking Phonograph Co. offices. Later that evening, however, Edison replied to Fox, "Say to Lockyer very sorry last train had left ere telegram received." DF (TAEM 15:1086–87). New York's Sketch Club, a serious artistic and literary society, had expanded and reconstituted itself in 1846 as the Century Club. According to its charter, the Century was open to persons wishing to cultivate "a taste for Letters and the Arts and social enjoyment." Many of its founders were noted authors or artists, but the Century's rapidly growing membership was more inclined to social enjoyment. By this time it was known as a place of genteel leisure for New York's professional and independently wealthy men. Bender 1987, 123, 139–40.

2. Lockyer is probably referring to illustrations for the article “Edison’s Inventions” that appeared in the 24 October issue (18:674–76). The cuts, from various Scientific American articles, showed the harmonic Page 602 (tuning fork) engine, carbon rheostat, phonomotor, and megaphone.

3. Edison had apparently promised Lockyer a tasimeter. Just prior to the eclipse, Lockyer had sent an enthusiastic report of the instrument to Nature (18:401–2):

One of the many points of interest here, to me, has been the observatory in which Mr. Edison has been experimenting on his tasimeter. It is truly a very wonderful instrument, and from the observations made last night on the heat of Arcturus, it is quite possible that he may succeed in his expectations. For its extreme delicacy I can personally vouch. The instrument, however, is so young, that doubtless there are many pitfalls to be discovered. Mr. Edison, however, is no unwary experimenter.

4. It would be two years before Edison actually sent his first phonograph to the Patent Office Museum in South Kensington, London (now the Science Museum). See TAEB 3:649.

  • From George Gouraud

London 16 Octr 1878.a

T. A. Edison Esq

Telephones

Everything is going on satisfactorily and I shall forward you in a few days the papers in the case of the first organisation namely “The Railway Speaking-Telephone Company of Great Britain (Edisons Patent)” outline form prospectus of which I enclose.1

The object of my first transaction as reported to you by Cable and approved was mainly with the idea of securing the entire time and services of a very useful man who makes the first advance himself and under my direction “pulls the wires.” I took the course I did with respect to submitting to you the proposition by Cable for the reason that the only way I could get him to decide at once was by saying that I would join him in the purchase on that basis, he therefore does not know that you share with me the Stock I am to have. The plan accomplished the purpose. He does not know nor does any one else the basis of my contract with you nor is it necessary that they should. What I do with them I do on the merits of the basis known to them: what I do with you is nobody’s business but yours and mine.

I propose to get several times the sum named as advanced Royalties from the Company formed and you will also receive a large proportion of the shares of the Company as well.

Now, I will tell you generally what my ideas are as to the best means of making the most of the splendid material in hand namely,—that we shall not sell out the whole thing to, Page 603 nor place the whole matter in the hands of, any one set of people however good they may be but that we shall organise all over the Country in all the large Towns in Great Britain a separate Company called “The Speaking Telephone Company of”—Edinburgh, Glasgow, Manchester, Sheffield & so forth—having a local Board in each place consisting of the best men in the place and divide it as on outlined inb form Enclosed.

I propose for the general basis of these Companies something like the following

1. That the Patentees shall grant exclusive Licenses,c he to receive one-fourth (if I can make it so—one-fifth at least) of the price charged by the Company as Royalties or Sale leaving to each Company the rates to be determined

2. The Company to pay an advance of as much as I can get in each case on account of Royalties all the way from £1000 to £20,000 depending upon the comparative estimated values of the districts licensed.

3 That you are to have perpetual representation on the Board of each Company so long as your interest in its business is dependent upon Royalties or profits. I mean until—as it is possible might be the case—your entire interest were bought out.

I propose that I shall be that Director but whoever he may be he shall have the power to appear by proxy at all meetings of either an entire Board or an Executive Committee thereof.

There are some novel features about this plan but they have the merit of common sense and the plan of separate Companies in any such undertaking is, I believe, in this Country quite unknown; but several friends of mine whose opinions I esteem most highly confirm my impression that it is the very best we can adopt.

I propose to have everything perfected in the way of the organisation down to the minutest detail so that whenever we are ready to exhibit the thing in a certain locality we may take advantage of the local excitement and gratuitous advertising which we are bound to get from the Press and be ready to at once accommodate a few of the people who are sure to want to go in; and, striking whilst the iron is hot there will be nothing to do but receive their cheques and furnish to them their Shares. I should propose to offer as available for local subscription as a rule only a proportion of the total Share issue beginning with a half and raising the amount to accommodate any demand beyond that. Page 604

I have had numerous offers already to organise Companies in different places if I would place the matter in the hand of the proposers but I have decided that one organisation being perfected it is a mere matter of machinery to grind out as many more as may be needed and by these means we will save parting with interest that we would have to give to others to do work that we can get done at a small expense ourselves. This plan you will observe practically gives me control over our joint interests—yours and mine—of each organisation and the system of local Companies will enable us to get into, not only the Board but as Shareholders of the Telephone Company a vast number of prominentd people who could not possibly be expected to either take Shares or be Directors in a single London Company. The one exception to the exclusive privilege in any single geographicalc district to any one Company will be “The Railway Speaking-Telephone Company of Great Britain” whose business will be confined exclusively to Railway Companies which run everywhere and to which, in the end we may be obliged to sell the privilege outright as a means of getting the most money since experience proves that they are apt to prefer the payment of rather round sums to have done with internal administrations and to avoid the necessity of requisitions and accounts. But you will see that this exception will not materially affect an extensive business to each local Company.

Unless I am greatly mistaken you will derive a most satisfactory income from your share in thiese Companyies and which it shall be my special pride as well as my own best interest to make as large as possible

Bell Telephone Co’s Injunction

We all agree that we had better not put out any Telephones commercially in any way until we get the new Receiver since you declare that that will place the question of infringement beyond all possibility Meanwhile we really lose no time since we shall go on with a sort of private demonstration of the power of the instrument and the selection of our shareholders and Directors, but you will of course appreciate the great importance of losing no time in placing us in that impregnable position which the new Receiver promises to afford

Your Telephone generally

I have established a little Telephone Exchange of my own account as per Plan enclosed,2 connecting my office with several offices in the City with which I am always in constant communication I show the Telephone from here and I may Page 605 say that without exception everybody who has thus far seen it—and only the choice few have been invited—pronounce it, as of course you will not be surprised to hear—all that we can ask with respect to its superiority to Bell’s—in a word the gist of the comparison is simply that one is practicable and the other is not; and no one asks anything better than yours so that if your new Receiver is as your Cable informs me four times as loud—well, unless it jars upon the brain I suppose it will not do any harm but what you have given is good enough, still I suppose you cannot help followingc it up to get the existing to what you believe to be the possible or what to you is synonymous with perfect.

We none of us like the tube instrument the Receivers being so far away there was a certain resonance from the action of otherwise imperceptible waves of the atmosphere striking against the tubes themselves. We like the bracket form infinitely better and are having a lot made with a table adapted to the size of English Telegraph forms and the Call Bell underneath so that there is nothing visible but the Transmitter and Receiver. We put an extra arm to the Transmitter bracket so that it may be used when sitting upon a chair or by giants or dwarfs, children &c. We will also have a bracket upon the wall in which to hang the receiver should it be desired to sit long either for conversation or reading through the Telephone making it unnecessary to hold anything. We shall go ahead with this form of transmitter and use the present receiver for those made in advance of the new and independent Receiver.

I enclose copy of the manner in which I metc the first attack of Bell which I think will meet with your approval and will show them that we mean business.3

What I meant in my Telegram about sending Transmitters only was that Adams for some reason decided to make the Receivers here

Electric Light

If I had had my wits about me when your Telegram came announcing your discovery in this connection I might have made you a clean million as it played the very devil with Stocks all over the country. They have since rallied somewhat partly due to circulation by the Bulls of reports that your discovery is all a hoax; notwithstanding Adams is deluged by letters and visits of enquiry. I enclose sample of two letters selected from this morning’s mail with the circular form of reply adopted in one case and special reply in the other. 4 I also enclose card which will probablyc appear in to-morrow’s papers Page 606 from Adams. By the way I am conducting all this correspondence in Adams’s name but from the address of my office where he has a private room and every convenience.

Now, my dear fellow, I would express my very high appreciation of the compliment you pay me and your kindness as well in proposing to place in my hands this further invention and one, which, if all is true that is credited to it should be found the most money-making thing that you could possibly have produced and I need only assure you that you shall have, as usual, my best attention. I regret that you should have found it necessary to combine with me in England somebody in New York as you intimate however “bright strong ac party” it may be. With regard to the Continent and your sentiment for Puskas Ie will abstain from comment from motives of delicacy. 5c I feel it however due to you to state that one circumstance concerning him in which I have felt your honor to be at stake and the course which I pursued in connection with it.

It has been impossible for me to proceed in the matter of the preparation of the necessary papers between yourself and the proposed Companyies without more information concerning the Patents Deeds &c than I had; and, inasmuch as you advised me that the Telephone Patents were included in the Phonograph patents and that I should obtain a copy of Nottage’s contract as a basis I undertook to do so, and finding the only practicable means to be a letter from Puskas to the Solicitors who drew it instructing them to furnish me a copy. I applied to him for it and after considerable hesitation and some delay he gave me a letter requesting them to allow me to read it and take a copy if I desired. This letter I gave to my Solicitors who made several visits and applications and quite contrary to the custom in the profession they were unable to obtain it, being pressed for the reason they finally gave it to be that supposing me to be interested with you they objected upon the ground that Puskas your agent in this matter had never paid the costs which had been repeatedly demanded of him. Upon receiving this information I immediately instructed my solicitor to state that I was connected with you and represented your inventions in this country, and that I would personally guarantee the prompt payment of all the charges in question incurred in your behalf. Now my dear fellow you must draw your own inferences from this statement which is more evidence corroborative of more than one rumour I have heard about the gentlemen in question.

I feel perfectly certain that this invention can be worked to Page 607 more profit from London as its centre than by any other possible means as all the large Continental Banking interests have Branches or Resident Partners, or intimate connections here in London and if your Light is what we are led to infer it will be the biggest thing in the world for making money with. I am always at your command and if you like to make my interest in this subject include the Continent either as a whole or as a part you will of course do so.

Other letters referred to as enclosed I have not time to get copied, will go forward by next mail.

ENCLOSUREf

The Speaking-Telephone Company of

Directors

________ a Swell

________ an M.P

________ a Railway Director

________ a manufacturer

________ a merchant

________ a Banker

Mr Butcher6—& myself—

Bankers

The best firm of Localc Bankers

Solicitors

The best firm of local Solicitors

Brokers

The best firm of local Brokers & also a good firm of London

Brokers as Londond Brokers to the Coy.

Consulting Engineers

Thomas A Edison & The most prominent Electrician

in the District

Telephone Engineer

James Adams

ENCLOSURE*

London, 187h

Edison’s Electric Light

To the Editor of7

Sir:

May I ask so much of your valuable space as to allow me to take this means of replying to the communications which are pouring in upon me from all quarters, as well as personal applications to an extent quite beyond my powers to meet with personal interviews. Page 608

Nothing can at present be said upon the subject of Edison’s Electric light further than has already been made known through the medium of the press, except that every effort is being made to push forward the securing of the patents so soon as this is accomplished, not a moments time will be lost in exhibiting the process in this country.—

Meanwhile no contracts can be entered into for the sale of, or licenses under the patents; but the numerous applications already received as well as any that may be hereafter received will be duly noted and the writers communicated with whenever that part of the business is ready to proceed with.

It may perhaps be of value to add that the reports circulating in some quarters to the effect that “the whole thing is a hoax” must have emenated from interested parties as there is no doubt whatever that Mr Edison has made the “alleged” discovery in question.

It shall be my very great pleasure Mr Editor to extend to yourself together with the other Editors of the leading journals the first invitation to witness the practical operations of “The Edison Electric light.” Yours faithfully

Assistant to T. A. Edison.

L, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:243). Note form of George Gouraud; note form is electric pen copy. aLondon” and “1878.” preprinted. bInterlined above by Gouraud. cObscured overwritten letters. dInterlined above, f“strong a” interlined above by Gouraud. gEnclosure is D, in same hand as letter, enclosure is D (electric-pen copy), in an unknown hand on letterhead of Edison’s Carbon Telephone. h“London,” and “187” preprinted.

1. The enclosure is probably the printed prospectus in DF (TAEM 19:998). No other papers for this company have been found.

2. Not found.

3. Not found.

4. Only one of the letters is known; it is from the law firm of Wilson, Bristows, and Carpmael. Gouraud’s “special reply” survives, as does a copy of a general response letter and a short electric pen circular response letter. These are in DF (TAEM 16:256–60).

5. Gouraud wrote Edison on 18 October criticizing Puskas for combining with Bailey on European telephone matters and again on 26 October describing Edward Brewer’s poor opinion of Puskas. He concluded the latter letter by commenting that “there must be some fire where there is such a continual smoke.” DF ( TAEM 19:948, 960).

6. Probably William Butcher, subsequently jailed on forgery charges, whose 21 September 1878 agreement Gouraud later charged to be fraudulent. Gouraud to Edward Bouverie, 14 July 1879; TAE agreement with Bouverie, 1 Aug. 1879; Renshaw & Renshaw to Gouraud, 20 Sept. 1879, all DF (TAEM 52:616, 648, 800).

7. Two days later the London Times published the first three paragraphs of this letter in substantially the same form. It was signed by Page 609 James Adams using Gouraud’s address at 6 Lombard St., London. “Edison’s Electric Light,” London Times, 18 Oct. 1878, 4.

  • Draft Caveat: Electric Lighting

Menlo Park Oct 16, 1878

Electric Light Caveat No 51

The object of this invention is to subdivide the Electric Light by causing Etc Etc

Fig. 1.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 1 shows a method whereby as the current increases in strength the foil A Expands and rotates the lever B around the disc C by means of the shaft m and string or cord n. The spring s serves to keep the foil A stretched X [-]a is a flat foil on the face of the chalk disc C, this foil is included in the circuit when A expands the arm B moves to the left and cuts more of the foil X in circuit hence as the current strength increases more foil is thrown in circuit reducing the temperature of A hence A cannot rise in temperature to the melting point

Fig 2


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 2 shows a method to decreasing the resistance of the incandescent foil A when its temperature rises hence the temperature cannot rise above a certain degree. Upon the expansion of A the lever B is brought in contact with A and a portion of the circuit passes through B. S. is a spring to keep the foil A stretched Page 610

fig 3


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 3 shows the regulation of the temperature of the foil A by stretching short circuitingb it. a second but smaller strip B forming a part of the short circuit

fig 4


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 4 shows the usual short circuiting method with the addition of and extra device for throwing the incandescent conductor of out circuit when it is not to be used & throwing in circuit a resistance equal to it, so as to keep the resistance of the line perfectly constant. C & D are contact points seperated by the disc n upon the upward movement of the screw g— when they are seperated the foil A is cut of circuit & the resistance R thrown in Page 611

fig 52


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 5 shews a method of throwing more or less foil in circuit by means of an axial magnet. X is the axial magnet C a pulley on which a long strip of foil is wound, n is a weight to keep the foil stretched B is a rod dipping in mercury through which the connection is made, when the current strength increases the core is attracted within the magnet spool to a certain distance & thisc give rotation to the drum C and the weight n uncoils more foil Page 612

fig 6


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 6 is a similar arrangement a spring X gives the downward motion. C is the drum carrying the foil and a an extra foil whose expansion allows C to rotate and more foils unwinds

fig 73


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 7 shows a variable short circuit around the incandescent foil A. C is a block on which is wound fine wire a spring n when A expands flattens out and short circuits more or less of the wire on c & thus shortens the shunt around A Page 613

fig. 84


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 8 shows a similar device X is a spiral spring which acts as a resistance a downward movement of the lever on the expansion of a brings all the spirals together and forms the short circuit thus preventing any spark

Fig 95


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 9 is a similar device the rotation of the cylinder short circuits more or less of the springs upon the metal peices B thus shortening the shunt Page 614

fig 10.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 10 shows a shunt formed by a Carbon button

fig 116


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 11 is another modification of the carbon button principle

fig 12


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 12 shows a sliding contact Point X being the platina Page 615

fig 13.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 13 shows the sliding contact point which in this case does not short circuit1 the foil A but closes a local circuit containing a battery and magnet the lever of the magnet short circuits the foil A

fig 147


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 14 is a similar device but the magnet is worked by a current from a derived circuit

fig 158


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 15 the magnet does not make a platina contact short circuit but one by pressure thus preventing sparks Page 616

fig 16


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 16 shews a rotating wheel with a peice of Carbon in it more or less of this Carbon is thrown in the shunt as the foil a expands or contracts

fig 179


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 17 shows a device whereby an increase in the current puts in an increased length of foil A in expanding rotates d and this having a large surface ied being a larger wheel allow more of the foil B to unfold. C is a spring to keep the foil stretched Page 617

fig 1810


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 18 shows an increased length of foil placed in circuit by means of axial magnetism

fig 1911


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 19 shows a coiled shunt whose resistance is increased or decreased by more or less contact with mercury

fig 20


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution
Page 618

Fig 20 shows two revolving contact wheels to insure clean contact points

fig 21


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 22


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 21 & 22 shows gradually diminishing resistancec of shunt by means of several springs arranged so that with a slight expansion of the spiral one spring comes in contact with its point and shortens the shunt and so on

fig 23


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

fig 24


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 23 & 24 show devices for giving increased length of foil when the current strength is increased Page 619

fig 25


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Fig 25 shows isc similar to 23 & 24 except the movement of the foil is obtained by mercury

Thomas. A Edison

DfS (copy) and ADS, NjWOE, Lab., Cat. 997:81 and NS-78-005 (TAEM 3:392; 7:828). Text written by William Carman, drawings multiply signed (some by Batchelor). aCanceled. b”short circuiting” interlined above. cObscured overwritten letters. d“Circled.

1. Figures 1–3, 5–16, and 19–25 of this draft caveat were included in Edison’s Caveat 85, filed 25 October 1878 (Edison Caveat 85). Edison’s drawings for the draft, all dated 15 October and many witnessed by Batchelor, are in NS-78-005, Lab. ( TAEM 8:828–36). They have been used in place of the copies made by William Carman.

2. Edison wrote “out” and canceled the horizontal line at top center—representing the cord from the magnet core—and redrew it attached to the underside of the pulley, thereby creating an apparently unworkable design. Text at right is “axial mag.”

3. Text is “insulated.”

4. Edison also wrote “Try” on this drawing.

5. Edison’s drawings also include an unfinished and unnumbered variation of this. NS-78-005, Lab. ( TAEM 7:828).

6. Edison wrote “TExpmt” on this drawing.

7. Edison wrote “Try this” on the drawing.

8. Edison wrote “This” on the drawing.

9. Edison wrote “Try this” on the drawing.

10. Edison wrote “Try this” on the drawing.

11. Text is “Mercury.”

  • Frotn Grosvenor Lowrey

New York, Oct 17” 18781

My Dear Edison:

I have received your enclosure from the ex-Mexican Consul.1 Page 620

Decidedly I should think it best to take out patents in Mexico, and in others of the Central and South American States— wherever there is patent law, and to get Government concessions where there is not. You remember that upon Mr Edson’s suggestion you consented that these should go into the arrangement with the Edison Electric Light Company, subject however to a different provision as to royalty; that is to say, as I understood it, your royalty for those Southern Countries is not to be counted in the $30 000 to which you are limited for the United States and Canada.

Mr Soren2 is now going over the contract carefully, and I will have a provision put in fixing a similar limit for South America, say $30,000 for those countries. That, I think will be fair. After a conversation with Mr Banker this morning I think it right to suggest that you should not answer, for the present, any enquiries which may be put to you by parties recently in negotiation with you as to the progress you are making. After reflection it is our opinion that those parties have not been actuated by the most elevated sentiments, and we see no reason why they should be favored with the means of judging whether to come in or not within the fortnight which I gave. The answer which was made to me on the day when we parted, in your presence & in that of Mr Edson and Mr Banker, was such as to make me regret that I had suggested keeping the thing open. I think, therefore, as that gentleman3 is for the moment out, he is not entitled to have any information as to how you are getting on.

In respect to your letter of the 18th to your Paris Agent I should like to see you, and then we will draft a letter suitable to go to him.4

I am fully of opinion that the very best thing you can do is to interest J. S. Morgan & Co, of London, with you directly, so that they will be interested in enhancing the price instead of being interested in reducing it. I have mentioned this to Mr Fabbri,5 who has again complimented me upon getting to be too much of a Banker; but added, “of course that is the very wisest thing that Mr Edison could do, because then you may be sure that all the money there is in Europe to be got out of this thing will be got.” and I will add fairly accounted for.b

The rights and interests of Col Goreau and of your Paris Agent, of course, are to be protected. If these gentlemen are intelligent they will at once see that by enlisting the services of such a house as Morgan & Co their own interests will be very greatly enhanced. Page 621

I should like to know when you are coming in, and will telegraph to find that out today.6 Yours Very truly

G. P. Lowrey

LS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:152). Letterhead of Porter, Lowrey, Soren & Stone, Attorneys & Counsellors at Law. a“New York,” and “187” preprinted. b”and I . .. accounted for” interlined above by Lowrey.

1. Not found.

2. George Soren was one of Lowrey’s law partners and an incorporator of the Edison Electric Light Co.

3. Unidentified.

4. It is unclear what Lowrey means by Edison’s letter of the 18th, but see Doc. 1505.

5. Egisto Fabbri had become a Drexel, Morgan & Co. partner in 1876. After becoming a partner he stepped down as head of Fabbri & Chauncey, a major New York shipping and commercial firm with which Drexel Morgan did a large business. Carosso 1987, 148, 167–68.

6. No such telegrams have been found.

  • To Theodore Puskas

Menlo Park, N.J.a Oct 17, 18781

Dear Sir

I cabled you on the 15th inst as follows

“Puskas. Paris. Dont commit yourself on light without consulting me.” Edison2

Since I communicated with you last some friends [of]b mine in this country have engaged with me for the purpose of developing and perfecting in the highest degree the electric light, and with that in view have provided the requisite capital for that purpose as I have already informed you. By this means I hope before concluding any definite arrangements with any persons in Europe for the use of the light to be able to exhibit precisely what it can do and for that reason I am desirous that nothing should be consummated for the present, or until I have given you definite instructions on the subject. In the meantime my friends Messrs Drexel Morgan & Co of this city (being among the parties who have interested themselves here) have mentioned to me that Mr Harjes3 of their house in Paris would at the proper time be willing to confer with you in respect to what shall be done with the light in Europe. I shall be glad if you will put yourself in communication with Mr Harjes upon this subject, and meantime do nothing tending to commit either yourself [or]b me until we have completed entirely our demonstrations of the light here and until [I]b have given you further instructions. Yours Very Truly

T. A. Edison per Griffin

Page 622

L (letterpress copy), NjWOE, Lbk. 3:425 (TAEM 28:856). Written by Stockton Griffin. “Place from Edison’s laboratory handstamp; circled aC” written at top. bEdge of letterpress copy cut off; text from draft.

1. This letter was drafted by Grosvenor Lowrey following his letter to Edison of the same day (Doc. 1504). The draft is in DF (TAEM 18:150).

2. This cable is in DF (TAEM 18:145). Puskas answered on 17 October that he would consult Edison (DF [TAEM 18:149]).

3. John Harjes (b. 1830) was resident managing partner of Drexel, Harjes & Co., the Paris subsidiary of Drexel, Morgan & Co. Carosso 1987. 134.

  • Technical Note: Electric Lighting

Menlo Park, N.J., Oct 17 1878a

Caveat No. 6.1


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

regulating the total current.2


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Regulating the speed of the magneto also its current.3

TAE

X, NjWOE, Lab., NS-78-005 (TAEM 7:838). Letterhead of T. A. Edison. a“Menlo Park, N.J.,” and “187” preprinted.

1. The previous day Edison had drawn three pages that he labeled “Caveat No. 6” (NS-78-005, Lab. [ TAEM 7:836–37]). Most of those Page 623 drawings are lamp regulators resembling designs in draft Caveat 5 (Doc. 1503); one is a dynamo regulator. On 6 November he labeled three more pages of drawings the same way (Doc. 1556). He never filed any of these designs in a caveat.

2. These regulators (with the drawing from 16 October mentioned in note 1) show Edison’s first attempts to govern the output of a dynamo. The sketches show the large Wallace dynamo, which had recently arrived at the laboratory. In this drawing the cylinder at lower right represents an axial magnet (described in Doc. 1503 [fig. 5]) that works against a spring (at upper right, with the dynamo output wire attached) to pull an iron core downward with increasing force as the current through the coil (the dynamo’s output current) increases. If the current becomes great enough, the contact points (to the right of the cylinder) will short-circuit the output current (with potentially disastrous results).

Sketches from Edison’s testimony.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

3. This design shows the main current shunted through a governor attached to the dynamo’s shaft (at left). It is related to a design Edison sketched during his testimony in an 1881 patent interference in which a similar shunt runs through the field coils and a variable resistance. Edison said that that sketch and another related one showed experiments done in October or November 1878. Edison’s testimony, pp. 55–56; Edison’s Exhibit No. 9, both Keith v. Edison v. Brush (TAEM 46:141–42, 176).

  • From William Barrett

Dublin Oct 19, 1878

Dear Mr Edison

I wrote to you yesterday1 & today brings your letter of the 7th I am very glad to have your version of the Preece-Hughes affair if you will allow me I will at once publish the principal part of your letter; moreover, though Mr Preece is a personal friend of mine I prefer2 offending him to the suppression of what is true, and so far as I can judge with Preece’s Hughes & your letters before me—you appear to have been wholly justified in the statements you made. I will let Sir Wm Thomson see your letter & write [soon]b to himc on the question. Lord Rosse2 whose name is of considerable influence in scientific circles was here yesterday3 I regret that your letter was not before me then but I will show it to him on his return to town in a few days— I propose incorporating the facts you give me in an article in Nature and coming from an independent source I trust the English & New York papers will see your claims is justified. As to Clerac’s resistance tubes I am glad to have your confirmation of my own opinion that no mere variation in pressure—would suffice for Telegraph work— These are obviously afterthoughts just as in my own Page 624 case after my discovery of-flames there was an attempt made (by an eminent Scientific man to whom I had shown my early expts after suppressing my name & virtually claiming the discovery for himself) to refer the whole thing to some one else who happened long prior to have made an incidental and forgotten observation remotely related to it. Leaving these matters let me congratulate you on your new triumph. I hope your discoveries are in good hands The Carbon telephone is likely to be a much better speculation to the companies working it than it was for you. Have you tried recording the signals sent— An idea suggested by one of Varleys patents might be useful. A wire in a coil vibrating under the action of the current & its vibrations [revealed]4—by its movements in front of a chintz with a light behind.

With the Tasimeter I would suggest a cylindrical silvered mirror behind the strip, this gives a line of light fallingd on the strip— Do you wish these made by an special firm? I suppose it is patented & a royalty might be paid by the makers—I will go to London next week purposely to try some expts with your telephone on a 110 miles wire (Norwich to London) Mr——M. P. has lent me for the purpose. I send you a Dublin paper today with a short paragraph I sent them on your Telephone Perhaps something may be got out of the new expts I send you by withe this by book post— I will give Adams one of the instruments for you though they are hardly worth sending— I want electro’s of some of your things shown in Prescotts book for “Nature” & can they be got to save fresh wood cuts5 Yrs &c

W F Barrett

L (copy), NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:273). Written by Stockton Griffin. a“I prefer” interlined above. bCanceled. c”te him” interlined above. Transcribed as “pulling”. ‘Interlined above.

1. In this letter Barrett described some of his experiments with the tasimeter. DF (TAEM 16:270).

2. Laurence Parsons, the fourth Earl of Rosse, was an astronomer and later chancellor of Dublin University. DNB, s.v. “Parsons, Laurence.”

3. In his letter of 18 October, Barrett stated that he and Rosse had experimented with the tasimeter for two hours with imperfect results and that Rosse had indicated that he would “come again when I [Barrett] have more thoroughly mastered the instrument.”

4. Apparently unable to read Barrett’s writing, Griffin wrote “recorded” above and “reverted” below “revealed” as possible alternatives, enclosing the three words in braces.

5. See Barrett i878d.

  • From Condii, Hanson & Van Winkle

Newark, N.J., Oct. 19 1878a

Dr Sir

We shipped you to day N.J. Exfpress] the 12 in machine,’ this is our usual plating machine2 and of medium E[lectro]. M[otive]. Force3 Mr. Weston4 requests us to write you that in case you prefer one with greater El. M. force we will exchange for this, and that if you require any assistance in adjusting brushes5 &c beyond directions sent we shall be happy to send some one fr. factory6 Yours truly

Condit Hanson & Van Winkle7

L, NjWOE, DF, (TAEM 17:970). Letterhead of Condit, Hanson & Van Winkle. “‘Newark, N.J.,” and “187” preprinted.

1. Edison had ordered this machine on 10 October, apparently after obtaining a catalog of the Weston dynamos sold by Condit, Hanson, & Van Winkle. He purchased it for $306.25, a 12V2 percent discount of the listed price. TAE to Condit, Hanson & Van Winkle, 10 Oct. and 7 Nov. 1878, Lbk. 3:400, 485 ( TAEM 28:834, 911); Condit, Hanson & Van Winkle to TAE, 10 Oct. 1878, DF (TAEM 17:944).

2. Weston’s electro-plating dynamo was 12 inches long. It provided an output of steady direct current in comparatively large amount but not of very high voltage. In a letter of 12 October, Condit, Hanson & Van Winkle indicated that it had a two-inch pulley face and ran at a speed of 800 revolutions per minute. DF (TAEM 17:946); Prescott 1884, 658–60; Woodbury 1949, 64; U.S. Pat. 180, 082.

Edward Weston’s electroplating dynamo.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

3. The term electromotive force had been used with a variety of meanings but had come to refer strictly to voltage (see Prescott 1877, 73, 270; Sabine 1867, 333–41, and Thompson 1888, 15–24). Numerical measures of the electromotive force and other aspects of the Weston plating dynamo have not been found.

4. Edward Weston (1850–1936) was an English-born, Newark-based inventor and manufacturer of electrical technology and instrumentation. Woodbury 1949; DAB, s.v. “Weston, Edward.”

5. Wire brushes electrically connected the spinning portion of the dynamo with the rest of the circuit. They needed to press as lightly as possible against the moving metal contacts to minimize power loss to friction, yet firmly enough to guarantee good contact with minimal resistance and sparking.

6. It is not known when the dynamo was delivered to Menlo Park nor when it was set up and connected by belt to a steam-powered shaft to run it, but by 13 November the laboratory staff was conducting comparative tests with it and the two dynamos Edison had acquired from William Wallace. See Doc. 1572; Vol. 16:260, Lab. (TAEM 4:699).

7. The Newark firm of Condit, Hanson & Van Winkle (Condit & Hanson before mid-1876) sold chemicals and electroplating supplies. Edison had been a customer since 1872. The firm was designated as sole agents for the dynamos produced by the Weston Dynamo Electric Machine Co. (Abraham Van Winkle, president). Condit & Hanson bill of 3 May 1872, DF (TAEM 12:851); Condit, Hanson, & Van Winkle to Page 626 TAE, ii July 1876, Scraps. (TAEM 27:618); Woodbury 1949, 62–66, 72–74.

  • From Edward Johnson

NY Oct 19 [1878]

My Dr E.

I saw Lowrey and made an appointment with him for middle of next week. Meantime you will no doubt see him and by letting slip a remark indicative of your preference to have the Phono control in Other hands than the Bell Co. you will facilitate my programme He asked me for my opinion of your progress in Electric Light I gave it him in my usual “sattelite” style Yours

Johnson

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 19:141). Letterhead of Edison Speaking Phonograph Co.

  • Fromjosiah Reiff

[New York, c. October 19, 1878]1

Dear T.A.

How about the Canada Patents?2

J. C Reiff

Would it not have been old fashioned to have put me in as one of the incorporators of the Co here? Why cannot you have me in the company as a Director say on your a/c?

It might help us both—

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:283).

1. Reiff wrote this on the back of a letter from DeWitt Taylor dated 19 October (DF [TAEM 16:282]). Taylor, who wrote from New York City, probably sent this letter in the morning mail, as he indicated where he would be that day until 2:30 p.m. Reiff may well have sent Taylor’s letter to Edison in the afternoon mail. Lists of the Edison Electric Light Co. incorporators were published in both the 18 October New York World and the 20 October New York Sun (Cat. 1240, items 952, 963, Batchelor [TAEM 94:376, 382]).

2. Taylor had written Reiff on behalf of a mutual acquaintance named Kimball who was interested in introducing Edison’s electric light in Canada. Taylor also expressed interest in acquiring an electric light agency for himself.

  • From James Adams

London Oct 20th/78

T. A Edison

I reed your two letters to day’ will send by next mail the desired information.2 I go to Paris on the 22d but will not be able to stay very long as I have got my hands full here, but shall divide my time up between the two places as best I can Puskas was here the other day, and wants to know how soon I can go to Italy, but it will be impossable for me to go for a month yet. Bell people is rather softening than otherways I dont think they will trouble, us just yet. Blakey & Co.3 is going ahead making our telephones independent of them I think they would rather come to some kind of terms with us than go to law, however it remains to be seen what they will do. The fire department will be the first, to have our telephones in. there wires is mostly underground & very hard wires to work. I could put in any number of them if I only had them. I have got a first rate place in Gouraud’s office for Experimenting, it look quite a small laboratory I got in to day 112 fuller Bat-terys4 I have had him experimenting on his batterys for some time back, & he says that they will last eight months, or he will charge nothing for them, and very cheap and makes very nice looking boxes two cells in a case. I like the Western Union form better than any I ever seen and they take every-ones fancy here, that is the stile I will make in the future, only I put two receivers in place of one. You speak about deprecating Puskas actions I tell you everything I hear how and where from and you can be your own judge expecting to hear from you soon I am yours truly

Jim

Saw the editor of the Journal of the Telegraph and he feels sure that the reason that you did not send him some cuts was because you think that Preece is in some way connected with the paper, he says he once was but not now. he wanted me to ask you if you would bea kind enough to send him a cut of yourself.5 I believe he has has written to you himself. The few tube telephones that I have made I will use them someway out in the country they are good enough for short & quite wires I wish you would send me a good stock of lamp black as early as you can and I wish you would send me a bradly reostate. 6 I am in want of that very bad as I am going about from place to place I would like to have my own mesureing apparatus dont forget to send that

Things could not look up better than at the present time I Page 628 have no further troubles Perfectly satisfied that I can work any wire in London

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 19:953). “Interlined above.

1. Not found.

2. It is not known what information Edison had requested. The next extant letter from Adams is dated 30 October from Paris. In that letter he reported that “there has been no telephone tests made here for the last two months except a few days before I came over, and everthing was busted, at any rate they only could just hear it by talking very loud so they thought telephones had given out. I tried them today and found it so.” After testing the telephones, however, he discovered that their poor showing was at the Versailles end on account of iron hooks used to hang the wires there and he arranged for the use of another line. He also told Edison that he had seen Count Du Moncel who “still inclines towards Hughs.” DF (TAEM 19:962).

3. Probably the firm of Blakey and Emmott, located in Halifax, England. Povey and Earl 1988, 18.

4. A powerful bichromate of potassium cell invented by John and George Fuller (Brit. Pat. 3, 339 [1877]). Relatively inexpensive to maintain, untended Fuller cells could stay in good condition for a few months if little used. Steady usage required attention to the cells at intervals of four to six weeks. Edison and his staff had experimented with Fuller cells for the electric pen, which like the telephone was used intermittently. Niaudet 1884, 211–20; Maver 1892, 17–18; TAEB 3:201, 220, 225 n. 15, 227 n. 2.

5. The Journal of the Telegraph was published in New York; Adams meant the London-based Telegraphic Journal and Electrical Review, edited by John Munro. William Preece had helped begin the Telegraphic Journal in 1872 and he edited the first few issues. On 24 October, Munro asked Edison to provide a photograph for the Telegraphic Journal and Electrical Review to publish in an ‘occasional series of illustrated biographical essays on “our most eminent home and foreign electricians.” Munro thanked Edison in November for sending a portrait and stated that “we intend to produce the photo and biography immediately after publicity has been given to the Edison Electric Light.” He asked that Edison permit the Telegraphic Journal to publish it “in the same number with our detailed and illustrated description of your light” at the same time that American journals printed full details about the light. However, Munro’s planned “Edisonian number” did not appear in the next several years. Baker 1976, 107; Munro to TAE, 24 Oct. and 25 Nov. 1878, DF ( TAEM 17:208, 252).

6. Leverett Bradley, the late Jersey City manufacturer, had developed a rheostat and galvanometer set for making accurate electrical measurements. Bradley 1872.

  • From George Barker

Philadelphia Oct. 20th 1878a

My dear Edison:—

The papers you placed in my hands have all been sent to the printers and I shall have some proofs to send you soon.1

I am quite surprised at the attitude Morton took the other night in regard to electric illumination.2 If he hadn’t seen your light, he might at least have believed your statements about it. I am waiting to see how astonished he will be when the thing comes out. By the way how much longer before you are to make the thing public? Let me know when the seal of secrecy is removed, please. I notice in the papers of Friday a list of incorporators of an Electric Light Co. with a capital of $300,000. Is this a Company formed for New York state only, or does this Company control the whole thing? I sent a note of introduction to you the other day by a Mr. Davis, a prominent gas man.3 I was introduced to him by Dr. Genth & dont know him at all, though he seemed a gentlemen & represents a large capital. The gas people seem inclined, at least the more intelligent of them, to take up electric lighting. Has any move been made toward your light in Philadelphia? If there should be, I should like a chance there. My brother-in-law Mr. Thompson of St. Louis at whose house we were, you remember, is Sec. & Treas. of the Laclede Gas Light Co.4 He writes me to know if he can do anything to secure the right for your new light for Missouri. If there is a chance, I would be glad if you will favor him, if you can as well as not. There seems to be a great panic among the gas people in Europe too. By the way did you see Sir Wm. Thomson’s statement “The electric light, if there are a sufficient number of lamps can be produced with equal economy at a great and a small distance.”

You know I am depending on you for my lecture of Nov. 14th. I am expecting Bachelor to come with you & to stay with you at my house. Come over Wednesday if you can so that we can experiment all day Thursday. I expect to have two of Wallace’s machines, my own Gramme, a Siemens and a Brush machine; so there will be a grand chance to try your new light with the different currents. I would like to have you loan me for the lecture at least twenty burners, as I want to put a dozen on a chandelier on the stage and turn them on and off as you would gas. Then as you suggested a few on stands would be a good thing beside. I expect too, to drive all my machines on the stage with the new Otto gas engine5 which you saw at Wallace’s. I think now I shall have a four horse and a seven horse Page 630 power engine on the stage. I want to do a good thing and to give the Edison light a fine scientific send off.

If Bachelor is not too busy will you ask him to send me the things I gave him a memorandum of, particularly the automatic apparatus. I have sent my article on the tuning fork method 6 to the printers without having made the experiments I wanted to with that apparatus. How about the phonograph you said you would loan me? I notice you have two or three capital ones lying round your place and rusting. You might just as well let one lie round my place, where I will keep it from rusting and keep it for my own private use. Do send me one if only for a short time. When can you send me one of your new lamps to experiment with on my Gramme machine?

Have you seen Draper since he got back? He got 13 tons of game. He wants you to come & see him some day in N.Y. The Nat. Academy meets in N.Y. Nov. 5. Cordially yrs

Geo. E Barker.

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:286). Letterhead of University of Pennsylvania. ‘“Philadelphia” and “187” preprinted.

1. This refers to Edison’s AAAS paper on the tasimeter (Doc. 1401) and another on the sonorous voltameter (Doc. 1382). Both of these appeared in the American Journal of Arts and Sciences and the proof pages are in Cat. 1241, item 1074, Batchelor (TAEM 94:438).

2. See Doc. 1488 n. 2.

3. On 19 October, Edison received a telegram from L. H. Davis (sent from Riverton, N.J.), who indicated that he wanted to see Edison the following Monday on “important business with introduction from Prof Barker.” Edison replied that he would be at Hamilton Twombly’s office in the Western Union building%t noon that day. The letter of introduction has not been found and it is unknown if they met.

4. James D. Thompson, secretary of the Laclede Gas Light Co., lived on Washington Avenue in a fashionable St. Louis residential district. Goulds St. Louis Directory 1878, 916.

5. A four-stroke cycle, horizontal gas engine developed by German engineer Nicolaus Otto in 1876 and manufactured by the firm Otto & Langen. Bryant 1967, 651–57.

6. Barker 1878.

  • From Edwin Fox

New York Oct 20 1878

Friend Edison

I notice with regret that some of the papers envious of your well earned fame are doing all in their power to detract from the same and belittle you. I know that so far as you are personally Page 631 concerned you don’t care what they say but it none the less pains your friends. As one of the latter therefore I speak in the hope that the suggestion I offer may have a tendency to spike their fears. The interview with you in Sundays Sun is of the character that does you harm. 1 It makes you do too much talking. My friendly advice to you is not to talk to any more reporters. Let them write all they please about your inventions, let them if they desire confab with every employee in the laboratory, but keep yourself aloof and reserved. Your works speak fro fora themselves. In all that I have written about you I have sought to keep you on a high pedestal. Holding you out to the world as a chewer of tobacco2 and all such trash as doesb the Sun in the interview published is really too bad. Knowing your natural reserve and silence about your great works I am all the more pained to see you represented in the character of a person talking ad libitum about them.

Gen Grants great fame is due more to his reserve and silence than to anything else.3 Every word that you utter for publication should be to accord with your reputation like thunderbolts.

I trust my dear fellow that you will take these few suggestions in the spirit in which I write them. They are the emanations of a friend who is honestly desirous of seeing you mount still higher on the ladder of undying greatness Truly Yours

Ed. M. Fox

P. S. When will you be in town? E.M.F.

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 17:206). “Interlined above. “Obscured overwritten letters.

1. “Edison’s Electric Light,” New York Sun, 20 Oct. 1878, Cat. 1240, item 963, Batchelor ( TAEM 94:382).

2. The Sun reporter described the following incident:

Here Mr. Edison dropped his cigar stump from his mouth, and turning to Griffin, asked for some chewing tobacco. The private secretary drew open a drawer and passed out a yellow cake as large as a dinner plate. The Professor tore away a chew, saying: “I’m partly indebted to The Sun for this tobacco. It printed an article asserting that I chewed poor tobacco. That was so. The Lorillards saw the article, and sent me down a box of the best plug that ever went into a man’s mouth. All the workmen have used it, and Griff says there is a marked moral improvement in the men. It seems, however, to have an opposite effect on Griff. You see he has salted away the last cake for his own use.”

On 29 August, Lorillard & Sons had written Edison, “We learn from an article published in today’s ‘Sun’ that you are obliged to keep constantly Page 632 on hand a stock of musty tobacco for the use of malefactors, general depradators, and visiting scientists. Permit us to present you for your own personal use a package of’gold bars’.” DF (TAEM 15:1091).

3. Former president and Civil War general Ulysses S. Grant, whose extensive, best-selling memoirs had not yet been written. DAB, s.v. “Grant, Ulysses Simpson.”

  • Technical Note: Electric Lighting

[Menlo Park,] Oct 20 1878

Electric Light.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

I propose to use two or more induction coils arranged with commutators on a small quantity magneto machine. This commutator throws the current from the magneto first into one primary & thence to the others, without breaking the continuity of the magneto circuit. The same commutator also throws the secondary in circuit of a main wire jus simultaneously with the thr taking off of the primary & so on = 1 I hope by this means to get a current which may be opened and closed without interfering with the magneto machine, 2 also to conveniently obtain any tension required,3 and to prevent loss Page 633 of power by dispensing with a great amount of dead magnet wire, weight etc on a magneto machine.

T A Edison
J Kruesi
Wm Carman
M. N. Force
Chas Batchelor
Geo E Carman

X, NjWOE, Lab., Vol. 16:147 (TAEM 4:598). Document multiply signed and dated.

1. On 10 October, Edison drew a detailed sketch of two such commutators. Although there is no accompanying descriptive text, they are attached to a “Base” that may be the base of a dynamo. Vol. 16:124, Lab. ( TAEM 4:581).

Edison’s sketch of alternative connections for induction coils and commutators.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

2. Keeping a dynamo running evenly while varying the load on its main circuit—for example, turning lights on and off—was a significant problem in electric systems.

3. Edison is proposing to use the induction coils as transformers to change the voltage on the main circuit, which could be done by altering the proportions of the primary and secondary coils.

  • To Grosvenor Lowrey

Menlo Park NJ Oct 21, 1878a

Dear Sir

Perhaps you may remember in the matter of the Quadruplex suit a claim of Mr E B. Welch,1 of Boston to some interest in that invention. His letters and the contract on which he based his claim I think appear in the records of the above named suit.2 He has been sending me threatening letters, copies of the two last received of which I send you herewith.3 The experiments in which he claims to be interested were relative to Duplex telegraphy and were not successful. The expenses were all borne by me. Of course you understand the W. U. Co own all of that class of inventions with which my name has been connected. Will you please look into the matter and see if Mr Welch has a valid claim against me and greatly oblige,4 Very Truly,

Thos A Edison

Page 634

LS (letterpress copy), NjWOE, Lbk. 3:432 (TAEM 28:862). Written by Stockton Griffin. ‘Circled “C” written above.

1. E. Baker Welch had supported many of Edison’s telegraph experiments in 1868–69. See TAEB 1:71 n. 1; see also Docs. 36, 61, 64–65, 68, 75, 79, and 84.

2. Though Welch’s claims were not part of the Quadruplex Case, Josiah Reiff had expressed concern about it during Edison’s testimony (Doc. 895; see also Doc. 577). The contract is Doc. 61.

3. Welch’s letters of 12 and 19 October (DF [TAEM 19:554, 560). Welch had concluded the latter by stating “I have your letters acknowledging the contract—so you cannot deny it now.”

4. Welch had first asserted his claim in a letter of 30 May 1878, to which Edison replied on 20 June that he had sold out his interest in the duplex and believed that Welch’s contract had no value. The 9 October letter was Welch’s next contact with Edison and he again asserted his belief, based on the advice of lawyers, that he was entitled to a half interest in any of Edison’s duplex inventions. Edison answered on 12 October, “Where was the consideration. I had to pay [Charles] Williams his whole bill and the thing was a failure a man cannot sell what isnt existing. I have sold out to the Western Union what interest I had if any. They knowing your contract, you must look to them.” Edison apparently turned this matter over to Lowrey in order for him to take action as Western Union counsel. DF ( TAEM 19:527, 554); Lbk. 3:293, 406 (TAEM 28:739, 839).

  • From George Walker

New York, Octo2i” 1878a

Dear Sir,

There has been constant complaint with regard to the fragility of the carbon buttons; a new instance coming to my knowledge this morning leads me to address you speceially on the subject—1 Last week we sent twelve carbon buttons to Mr Merrihew at Philadelphia; they were packed with great care but when they reached him they were reduced to a state of powder. We have had similar experiences from other quarters. Is there not some method by which these buttons can be made more tenacious?—if not, can not you suggest any mode of packing which would be liable to the least objection? It occurs to me that a pill box, capable of holding six buttons, might be made just large enough to receive them, separating them perhaps with paste board buttons and putting cotton at the top and bottom to receive a slight pressure.

As we are likely to have a great many of these to send, and as the inconvenience resulting from their breakage is greater than the cost of replacing them, some method should be devised Page 635 at once to avoid the difficulty. Please suggest one. Yours very truly,

George Walker Vice Prest.

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 19:780). Letterhead of Gold and Stock Telegraph Co., George Walker, Vice President. a”New York,” and “187” preprinted.

1. The carbon buttons were manufactured at Menlo Park. The carbon was obtained by burning kerosene lamps and scraping the soot from their chimneys. The resulting lampblack was then placed in a press and compressed into buttons which were carefully weighed (Jehl 1937–41 1:131–32). At the time of this letter, Edison was furnishing some 200 buttons per day to telephone manufacturers, including George Phelps’s Western Union shop, Western Electric Manufacturing Co., Sigmund Bergmann, as well as to the Gold and Stock Telegraph Co. of California (TAE to Theodore Puskas, 5 Oct. 1878, Lbk. 3:394 [TAEM 28:828]). For other complaints about breakage see George Ladd to TAE, 19 Oct. 1878; George Scott to TAE, 2 and 7 Nov. 1878; Philadelphia Local Telegraph Co. to TAE, 20 Nov. 1878; all DF (TAEM 19:779, 782, 791, 795, 800). Orders for carbon buttons are in 78–039, DF (TAEM 19:833).

  • To Sampson Low, Marston, & Co. 1

[Menlo Park,] Oct 22a [18738

Dear Sirs

I am in receipt of your favor of the 9th inst— The suggestion made by you meets my approval—2 As soon as the details are worked out I will write a pamphlet on the Electric light and send you the manuscript in advance of publication here—3 Very Truly,

T. A. Edison per G[riffin]

L (letterpress copy), NjWOE, Lbk. 3:437 (TAEM 28:867). Written by Stockton Griffin.

1. London publisher Sampson Low had retired from business in 1875. His firm continued under the name Sampson Low, Marston, & Co. According to their 9 October letter to Edison, the other members of the firm were named Searle and Rivington. DNB, s.v. “Low, Sampson”; DF (TAEM 17:198).

2. In their 9 October letter (see note 1), the London firm had suggested publishing in England a work by Edison on his electric light inventions just prior to a similar publication in the United States in order to secure the British copyright and rights to translation in countries with copyright treaties. In exchange they proposed giving Edison a ten percent royalty and half the proceeds of translation or reproduction rights in other countries. They suggested that Edison produce “a small book containing a few explanatory diagrams or illustrations.”

3. On Sampson Low, Marston, & Co.’s reply to this letter, Stockton Page 636 Griffin indicated that he had written Edwin Fox about the proposed pamphlet and he later apparently wrote the firm about Fox. Edison wrote them on 18 December to indicate that he had made arrangements with the New York firm Harper Brothers for publishing the pamphlet in the United States and indicated that “the work will be commenced at once, but owing to the peculiar condition of affairs as regards patent applications, I cannot say definitely when it will be completed.” Sampson Low, Marston, & Co. published this letter in January as part of a circular announcing the forthcoming pamphlet. However, the pamphlet was never completed. Sampson Low, Marston, & Co. to TAE, 5 Nov. and 31 Dec. 1878, 13 Feb., 17 Mar. (with enclosures), and 17 Apr. 1879; Edwin Fox to Griffin, 4 Mar. 1879; all DF (TAEM 17:226, 266; 49:671, 682, 697, 678); TAE to Sampson Low, Marston, & Co., 18 Dec. 1878, Lbk. 4:52 (TAEM 80:25).

  • To Henry Plimsoll 1

[Menlo Park,] Oct. 23d [187$

Dear Sir

Your favor of” the 21st with introductory letter from Mr Reiff was duly rec’d.2 I am at present working nights and sleeping during the day and am so busily engaged that for the present I cannot make an appointment. And besides I have transferred my interests in the Electric Light to a Co in New York. It is not my intention to meet the public in a business way with this invention. Very Truly

T. A. Edison G[riffin]

L (letterpress copy), NjWOE, Lbk. 3:441 (TAEM 28:870). Written by Stockton Griffin. “Circled “C” with arrow written above.

1. Henry Plimsoll, probably<the brother of British reformer Samuel Plimsoll, was seeking safe lights for coal mines. DNB, s.v. “Plimsoll, Samuel.”

2. PlimsolPs letter as well as Reiff’s 15 October letter of introduction are in DF (TAEM 17:974–75).

  • From George Barker

Philada. Oct. 23d. 1878.

My dear Dr. Edison:— (Chevalier de la Legion d’Honneur)1

Your letter of the 21st I received this morning.2 I am glad to know what you write concerning the business management of the Electric Light since now I can refer all who apply to me to Mr. Lowrey. I gave my card a day or two ago to Prof. Chauvenet3 of St Louis, who came to me seeking just this information.

What you say about the use of your new light for my lecture quite upsets me. You will remember that before I consented to give the lecture, I came to Menlo and saw you about it. And Page 637 that it was upon your promise to let me exhibit the new light at my lecture, that I agreed to give it. We not only talked about my having it, but we discussed the different forms in which it would be best to put it, and you offered me six of those cast iron stands with the lamp on them. Not only therefore have I promised several of my friends here that I would exhibit the new light at my lecture, but it has been advertised in the papers. I am anxious to make a complete demonstration on the electric light side of the question, and I have been counting on you to help me. As to the Company, I cannot conceive of their having any objection to its exhibition in a public lecture. On the contrary it would be an endorsiment of it which would be of the highest value to them. No, if that is the real reason and you yourself are all right and are anxious for me to have it, I will go to New York myself & with such letters as I can get, I think I could get their permission. Not to have one of your lights there at my lecture after all I have promised, places me in a position before this community which I would rather lose my right hand than occupy. Only two weeks ago and you wrote that you would try and come over to the lecture. Now you dont know whether you can loan me even a light for the occasion. I beg of you not to desert me now. Do let me show something that represents your new invention.

You will find the reasoning of Dr. Siemens4 upon which Sir. Wm. Thomson reasons so well, upon transmission of electricity, in the discussion which took place in the Institution of Civil Engineers, London, on the evenings of Jan. 22 & 29, and Feb. 5, 1878. It is published in their Proceedings, vol. lii, part 2. I have it in a separate pamphlet & will have it copied, if you care for it. Thomson says “with an exceedingly moderate amount of copper it would be possible to carry the electric energy for one hundred, or two hundred, or one thousand electric lights, to a distance of several hundred miles.” Houston & Thompson’s electric lamp of which Morton speaks so approvingly, proposes to use vibrating carbons producing a secondary spark at each separation, generated from a large coil in circuit. They think as this secondary spark is so bright they can get a bright light with very little battery power! Trying to lift themselves by their boot straps again!

Thanks for the things you promise to send me. I shall look for the phonograph tomorrow. Don’t let my lecture fail will you? Cordially yrs

Geo. F. Barker.

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 17:979). Page 638

1. Edison was named a Chevalier of the Legion of Honor (the lowest of the three ranks) at the close of the Universal Exposition in Paris. Official notification of his award has not been found, but New York newspapers of 22 October 1878 carried comment about it and background biographical information (e.g., “The Legion of Honor: Sketches of the Honored Americans,” New York Herald, and “Decorated Americans,” New York World, Cat. 1241, items 964–65, Batchelor [TAEM 94:383]). The only surviving item in Edison’s Legion of Honor folder in Paris records his elevation to the highest rank (Commander) eleven years later in connection with the 1889 Paris Exposition.

2. Not found.

3. William Chauvenet was professor of mathematics and natural philosophy and later chancellor of Washington University in St. Louis. BDAS, s.v. “Chauvenet, William.”

4. William Siemens headed the London firm Siemens Bros., one of the complex of family enterprises led by his older brother Ernst Werner von Siemens. William made significant contributions in several fields of science and technology. See TAEB 3:171 n. 2.

  • Frotn Grosvenor Lowrey

New York, October 23d 1878a

My dear Edison

There is an important meeting of the Board of Directors to-morrow and you ought to attend— The agreement will be ready to sign1

I think too for various reasons that we ought now, before the thing gets larger to have a talk with Drexel Morgan & Co in respect to matters on the other side; & for this purpose I wish you would bring in any papers or correspondence with Goureau or Puskas which wd enable me to judge more accurately of what is due to them

Much reflection confirms me in the belief that the Electric Light, if it is or is to be what we suppose, requires to be represented by sober business men of the highest commercial standing; and they must make just provision for any claims either defined or undefined,—legal, or moral only, which Mr Puskas or others may assert— The dignity, & importance of the invention to the world, demand that it shall be introduced by men possessing a comparative strength & power in the financial world—

But these men too are to be dealt with carefully; & if you could stay down to-morrow evening, I also would stay in town & we would have a clear talk with Mr Fabbri

The applications come pouring in— I have to-day an urgent application from Wheeler & Wilson2 to put the thing at once in their great factory at Bridgeport. Page 639

How would this suit you for an experiment. It is eleven hundred feet long, & has no light at present because of the risk from fire Yr Trly

G. P. Lowrey

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:45). Letterhead of Porter, Lowrey, Soren & Stone, Attorneys & Counsellors at Law. ‘“New York,” and “187” preprinted.

1. The meeting was adjourned to 31 October and twice more before the agreement was signed on 15 November (Doc. 1576). Edison Electric Light Co. to TAE, 31 Oct., 6, 13, and 15 Nov. 1878, DF (TAEM 18:54, 60, 68, 70).

2. The sewing machine firm founded by Nathaniel Wheeler and Allen Wilson. DAB, s.vv. “Wheeler, Nathaniel” and “Wilson, Allen Benjamin.”

  • Stockton Griffin to Grosvenor Lowrey

[Menlo Park,] Oct 23d [187]8a

Dear Sir

Mr Edison has been confined to his bed all day,1 is suffering from neuralgia in the facial nerves— He had great difficulty in reading your communication.2 He requested me to say that it is doubtful if he will be able to go to N.Y. tomorrow but he will do so if possible.3

Regarding [—]b the Wheeler and Wilson application he says he very much prefers making his first exhibit of the light at Menlo Park. Very Truly

S. L. Griffin

ALS (letterpress copy), NjWOE, Lbk. 3:444 (TAEM 28:873). “Circled “C” written above. bCanceled.

1. Griffin, on Edison’s behalf, also notified Hamilton Twombly of this in a telegram sent at 4:20 that afternoon. Edison had planned meetings with Twombly and with Lemuel Serrell, in the latter case to complete urgent business regarding foreign patents. Twombly to TAE, TAE to Twombly, and George Bliss to TAE, all 23 Oct. 1878; TAE to Serrell and Serrell to TAE, both 22 Oct. 1878; all DF (TAEM 16:304, 18:776, 775).

2. Doc. 1520.

3. Edison clearly planned to go but did not. At 8:50 a.m. on 24 October he had Griffin telegraph to Dr. Leslie Ward to come to Menlo Park because he was “quite sick” (Lemuel Serrell to TAE, TAE to Gamble, both 23 Oct. 1878; TAE to Ward, 24 Oct. 1878; all DF [TAEM 18:777, 19:563, 16:305]). When Lowrey found Edison was in bed under the doctor’s care, he asked if Edison would be ready to undertake business if he came to Menlo Park the next day; he was told that would not work but that Griffin would confer with him in New York instead (four telegrams Page 640 between Lowrey and Griffin, 24 Oct. 1878, DF [TAEM 18:4748]).

  • From George Gouraud

London 24 Octr 1878.a

T. A. Edison Esq.

Electric Light

I trust long before you receive this that the enclosed cable will have been replied to and that the Electro Bonanza will be born. I have been visited by a great number of influential people amongst the very first in the City who are all of one opinion that there never was a time so favorable to the launching of a large Company than the present for the Edison Electric Light Company. All conditions are anomalous. There are two hundred and seventy millions of Pounds Sterling ($1, 360,000,000) trembling in the balance on the actualities of your—as they call it—”alleged” discovery. The whole scientific world is as busy as a bee in trying to find out how you have done it and the danger of delay comes from this rather than anything else. Besides now we have a universal free advertising such as cannot be bought for money under any circumstances. Every paper throughout the Kingdom has something in it. I have endeavoured to keep you supplied with a fair assortment. It would have been folly to send you all as they naturally say much the same thing.

I am fully of opinion that my friends and advisers are right that now is the time to come out with a Company and that the Capital would be subscribed possibly several times over.

The long Cable concerning Reed and the Rapieff light is the result of several interviews which originated at their request and I have been for several days confined several hours each with Reed and some of his associates who are amongst the leading Bankers here. The result reached with them is expressed in the annexed cable so fully as to make further explanations unnecessary. They began naturally enough by proposing joint interests profits and that sort of thing but I would listen to nothing except upon the basis, if at all, of having Royalties on their thing only where it was used and so they finally expressed themselves as very satisfied. They were frank enough to say that although they were on the point of bringing out their Company when your discovery was announced that in the face of public expectations concerning you and what you probably ha4ve done that they had no chance to hope successfully Page 641 to float a Company on anybody’s light and so I think the terms as finally agreed to will be found to have no disadvantages to us and indeed have the very important advantage of enabling us to at once proceed with the Company by reason of the fact of our being able immediately to furnish some kind of Electric Light.

GEG

ENCLOSUREb

[London] 24 Oct/78

Edison

Can effect promptly the following with your approval E.J. Reed controls Rapieff system already lighting Times printing office and adopted1 Reed as well as I already have numerous applications for immediate supply light on large scale rumours current of other subdividing inventions one such already registered most desirable occupy field quickly Reed prepared supply light immediately Combination would under present excitement command any capital thus controlling existing and future monopoly proposed immediate issue of Company capitalc million sterling capital £100 000 cash payable to you advanced Royalties immediately your system is exhibited here your perpetual royalty to be determined by yourself Directors subject to your approval Reeds royalty proportionate on his patents only when used Reeds present outlay £5000 repayable by Company each system to stand on its own merits This combination no disadvantage to us but the contrary General opinion of firstclass people here that we should proceed immediately and present availability of Rapieffs light and existing demand justify it Cable reply promptly

Geo E Gouraud

LS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:157). Note form of George Gouraud; note form is electric pen copy. aLondon” and “1878.” preprinted. bEnclo-sure is L (telegram, letterpress copy). ‘Written between columns.

1. The Rapieff arc-lamp system was used in the London Times composing rooms. In this system, the usual single set of vertical carbons was replaced by two sets, each in the form of a V. When a current was sent through the lamp, the lower pair dropped away from the upper pair and remained at a constant distance as long as the current flowed. An automatic shunt with a resistance equal to that of the lamp was used to maintain the circuit when the arc was extinguished. Prescott 1879, 509; Dredge 1885, 1:415–20.

  • Telegrams: Edwin Fox to/from Stockton Griffinn

October 25, 1878a

New York 7 p.m.

S. L. Griffin or Chas Batchelor

Please telegraph me for publication Edisons condition tonight 1 If Dr Ward there2 will you oblige Herald by getting from him statement of diagnosis and prospect Answer quick

Edwin M Fox NY. Herald
Menlo Park, N.J.,b 8:35 p.m.

E M Fox

Mr Edison caught a severe cold Sunday or Monday and since Wednesday morning has been suffering from Neuralgia.3 Dr Leslie Ward says positively that it is merely local and is nothing serious.4 Says Mr Edison will be out again in two or three days Unless complications arise thinks he will be out in a few days Private. To Fox Ward sanctions the above

Griffin

He is being kept under the influence of anodynes and is comparatively comfortable tonight— Dr.c Ward remainswill here remain here for a time—

L and ALS (telegrams), NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:314). Written by Griffin; letterhead of T. A. Edison. aDate from document, form altered. b”Menlo Park, N.J.,” preprinted. cObscured overwritten letter.

1. Much interest in Edison’s well-being was shown during the day. Griffin evidently went to New York to see Grosvenor Lowrey. While he was away Charles Batchelor handled various inquires about Edison’s health, and a reporter, Walter Phillips, stated that many rumors were circulating about it. George Prescott to Batchelor, Batchelor to Prescott, Tracy Edson to Batchelor, Batchelor to Edson, Josiah Reiff to Mary Edison, Walter Phillips to Stockton Griffin, all 25 Oct. 1878, DF (TAEM 16:310–13).

2. Griffin had telegraphed Dr. Leslie Ward on behalf of Edison about an hour and a half earlier to come to Menlo Park to attend to Edison’s wife, Mary, who was about to give birth; at the same time Griffin sent a message from Edison asking Mary’s sister Alice Stilwell to come. DF (TAEM 16:314, 17:580).

3. October 25 was a Friday. The following day, Fox’s paper, the New York Herald, carried an article on “Mr. Edison’s Illness” (p. 5), which reported that Edison had “complained of neuralgic pains in the face” on Tuesday morning. His discomfort had increased during the day, “and by evening his face had swollen alarmingly, and serious results were feared. The next day his condition was, if anything, worse, and his attendants remained continuously at his bedside. The favorable change occurred yesterday morning.” The Herald also noted that “on several previous occasions Mr. Edison has been afflicted with neuralgia; but he has never before had such a severe attack.”

4. Immediately after receiving Fox’s inquiry, Griffin telegraphed a Page 643 message from Edison to Lowrey that Edison was still confined to bed though somewhat improved. DF (TAEM 16:315).

  • Stockton Griffin to Grosvenor Lowrey

Menlo Park, N.J., 8:54 [a.m.] Oct 26 1878 1

G. P. Lowrey

No particular change in Mr Edisons condition Dr Ward here all night. Called in Dr Dailey of Rahway this morning on account of Mrs Edisons whoseb condition which is not favorable.1 Dr Ward says he will certainly let me know if Mr Edison gets worse and approves of your suggestion to have physicians from NY if necessary2

S. L. Griffin

ALS (telegram), NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:316). Letterhead of T. A. Edison. a“Menlo Park, N.J.,” and “187” preprinted. “Interlined above.

1. Whether Mary Edison was suffering from anything in addition to difficult labor is unknown. Immediately after this, Griffin sent a telegram from Dr. Ward to his wife saying he would have to stay at Menlo Park at least until 1 p.m. DF (TAEM 16:316).

2. No message with such a suggestion has been found. Apparently it was made in Griffin’s meeting with Lowrey in New York the previous day.

  • Leslie Ward and John Daly to Edwin Fox

Menlo Park, N.J., 11:15 am Oct 26 1878a

Edwin M Fox1

Drs Ward and Dailey We have the pleasure to announce that Mr Edison is the Father of a twelve pound boy2 which came at nine oclock this morning Mother doing well ditto the Father

Mary and the infant William Edison.


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Drs Ward & Dailey

L (telegram), NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:317). Written by Stockton Griffin; letterhead of T. A. Edison. a“Menlo Park, N.J.,” and “187” preprinted.

1. This was directed to Fox at the “NY Herald office.”

2. The 27 October New York Herald printed a brief article on the birth of William Leslie Edison under the headline “Edison’s Latest. A New Talking Machine Makes Its Appearance in Menlo Park” (p. 7).

  • To Grosvenor Lowrey

Menlo Park, N.j., 5:09 p.m. Oct 26 1878a

G P Lowrey

Been up and dressed this afternoon feeling better got a twelve pound boy all doing nicely1

Edison

L (telegram), NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:317). Written by Stockton Griffin; letterhead of T. A. Edison. a“Menlo Park, N.J.,” and “187” preprinted.

1. A telegram, sent immediately after this one, from Margaret Stilwell, Mary Edison’s mother, to her son Charles, reported “all right here,” but said she would stay at Menlo Park until 28 October despite the apparent illness of her husband. Margaret Stilwell to Charles Stil-well, 26 Oct. 1878; Charles Stilwell to Margaret Stilwell, 28 Oct. 1878; both DF (TAEM 17:580–81).

  • Equipment Specification: Telephony

[Menlo Park,] Oct 26 1878

Telephonea


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

Kruesi:—

Make a telephone this pattern and put a clockwork inside to run the “chalk” and make the switch stop and start it. Design the chalk to be turned by a worm as it will not be strong enough without, as there is a strong pressure on the chalkb Page 645


					Image
Click for larger view
View full resolution

I think you had better drive from the second shaft and have only a few teeth in the worm wheel B[atchelor]

T A Edison
J Kruesi
Chas Batchelor
M. N. Force

X, NjWOE, Lab., Vol. 18:54 (TAEM 4:1089). Written by Batchelor. aUnderlined twice. bFollowed by centered horizontal line.

  • Technical Note: Electric Lighting

[Menlo Park,] Oct 27 78

Fundamental experiments

Paint the platina with”

Asphaltum

white lead paint

all the pigment paints—b

Mould platinum Black1 under great pressure in split mouldb

Make a Carbon of a mixture of ½ Carbon ½ Rutile=b Make a cylinder of 2/2 platina black 1/3 of precipitated chalk, use for incandescence.c

TAE
M N Force
J Kruesi
Chas Batchelor
Wm Carman
Geo E Carman

X (fragment?), NjWOE, Lab., Vol. 16:166 (TAEM 4:615). “Followed by blank line with “. ‘Followed by horizontal line across page. ‘Remainder of page torn off.

1. A spongy precipitate of platinum sometimes used in hydrogen and spirit lamps. Pepper 1869, 478.

  • Technical Note: Telephony

[Menlo Park,] Oct 27th 1878

Telephonea New Receiver

Discs made to receive on of =

42 grain Hg acetlb 30 min[ims] Na solution Not very low buf diaphragm squeaksd Page 646

32 grain Hg 30 min Na caustic very low & diaph. squeaksd

44 grains Hg. 30 min Na pretty good & loud no squeake 530 grains Hg 530 50b min Na 50 min Nad loud, needs a good deal of pressure though very good call it standard at presentc

6 grains Mercury 30 soda sol No good Blackd

42 grains Mercury 50 Min Na loud, needs a good deal of pressure though very good—good as standardc

30 grains Mercury 40 Soda Excellent good3 but squeaks best yest = Have to turn quickc

3 grains Mercury 30 Soda excellent good have to turn slow not quite so loud but clearer than previous onef

36 grains Acetat Hg and 40 min Soda Solution too low to be of use—no good—d

3 grains Acet Hg and 40 min Soda Sol. pretty fair but not up to Standard”1

42 grains Mercury 40 Soda Solution Beroked

18 grains Mercury 40 Soda Solution very good when turned slow—diaph. squeaksc

36 grains Mercury 20 Soda Solution middling fair articulation—makes considerable noise6

24 grains Mercury 20 Soda Solution prettyc good, seems to want Stiffer diaphragmc

36 Mercury Acet 30 Soda Solution Bang up good best yet!!! loud & clear Broke afterh

12 grains Mercury 30 gmin Soda Solution not very loud but works with light pressure

= 30 grains Acet. Mercury. 20 minims Soda Solution very poor, makes squeaking noise and when you turn fast it almost entirely disappears Broke taking out’

= 6 grains Acet Mercury. 40 minims Soda Solution”1 This is an elegant one, gives the natural voice and requires no pressure so being good for clockwork, very loud: squeaks a little1

= 42 grains Acet. Mercury 20 minims Soda Solution Not good enough = fair artic. but too lowd

12 grains Act Merc. 20 minims Soda Solution poor not loud enoughd

24 grains Acet. Mercury 40 min. Soda Solution no goodd

18 grains Acet Mercury 20 min Soda Solution No good 3 grains Acet. Mercury 20 Soda Solution Fair but lowd 18 grains Acet. Mercury 30 Soda Solution This is the Boss of the heap very loud and clear but it shake the diaphragm so that it rattles.k Page 647

12 grains Acet. Mercury 340 Soda Solution No good, not loud.d

Set the two best in the instruments and left them.

TAE
J Kruesi
Chas P Edison
Chas Batchelor
M. N. Force

X, NjWOE, Lab., Vol. 18:55 (TAEM 4:1090). Written by Batchelor; document multiply signed and dated. “Underlined twice. “Interlined above. ‘Obscured overwritten letters. aFollowed by centered horizontal line. bFollowed by centered horizontal line and large X in right margin. cFollowed by large X in right margin. d“Middling... noise” written by Charles Edison; followed by centered horizontal line. eFollowed by two large X’s in right margin and centered horizontal line. ‘Followed by centered horizontal double line. fFollowed by large X in right margin, centered flourish and centered horizontal line. gFollowed by large asterisk in right margin and centered horizontal line.

1. The following day Batchelor noted of discs made from mercury acetate: “We found that the current on line goes out through the transmitter but enough battery current also escapes through to affect the motograph very considerably & that by putting an extra cell in line & not changing the line or Battery wires we can get excellent talking.” He and Charley Edison proceeded to make extensive experiments with different acetate mercury discs. These continued through 30 October, when Batchelor tried a diaphragm that was twice as thick as their standard and used a mixture of 3 grains acetate mercury and 20 minims soda solution which he called “red hot for articulation.” After further experiments with thicker diaphragms and other solutions, he wrote “It seems to me that we want a greater percentage of caustic soda in the ‘chalks.’ So make a concentrated solution of it and try 3–20 on it.” On 31 October they conducted extensive experiments with chalks made from 3–42 grains acetate mercury and 20–50 minims of “caustic soda solutions of different strengths.” On 1 November, Batchelor also made a table showing the results of tests from the previous day of eight telephone boxes, each with a different chalk, and the result after they dried out overnight. They then “put large cells water in each with waste to see if any change tomorrow night,” but only one of the boxes did not change. After more tests, Batchelor concluded at 6 a.m. on the morning of 2 November that “all chalks made with strong solutions of soda are much more brittle than those tried before.” He also noted that 6 grains of acetate mercury with 30 minims of their No. 1 solution of caustic soda (5½ pennyweights of soda with 2 oz. of water) worked “Bang up just as good as original,” and this appears to have become the standard mixture. Vol. 18:59–67, 69, 71, Lab. (TAEM 4:1094–1102, 1104, 1106); Doc. 1553.

  • From William Croffut

New York, Oct. 28, 1878a

My Dear Edison:— (Batchelor, Griffin, et al.)

Telegraph me just as soon as you are willing to have that Page 648 lamp & new telephone fully described. Don’t let Cummings get ahead of me!

A photographer will come down with me to see if your light can be applied to photo-lithography.

Kiss the baby for me. Yours Very Truly

W. A. Croffut

I had long article about Edison in Indiana State Journal (In-diapnapolis) of yesterday.1

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 17:212). Letterhead of The Graphic Company. a“New York,” and “187” preprinted.

1. Croffut’s article appeared in the Indianapolis Journal on 27 October (p. 5) as “Edison Tells the Story of His Electric Light—More Wonders Coming.” The headline apparently referred to Edison’s promise that in a few weeks he would show Croffut “something new, and as important as anything I have ever made. I am on the track of it, and I believe it will revolutionize—hold on, though. I mustn’t tell any more now.”

Croffut based his article on a 22 October interview, just before Edison became ill. He reported finding Edison “up stairs in a tangle of wires of which he was trying to make a new telephone. He was looking rather worse than usual—with blood-shot eyes and a week’s beard, and the general air of not having eaten or slept for three or four days.” Croffut described the electric light and also made a rare public mention of Edison’s daughter. When Croffut asked if the light was harmless, Edison reportedly replied, ‘“O, entirely; it couldn’t hurt a child; could it, Dot?’ and he snatched up a little girl of five, his oldest, fair-haired, blue-eyed, the picture of her mother. She was eating a sugar cake and seemed happy, which suggested something to the father, for he put her down, went and lighted his pipe a,nd pulled at it for a minute or two with great satisfaction.”

  • Telegrams: Grosvenor Lowrey to/from Stockton Griffin

October 28, 1878a

NY 10:50 am

Griffin

How are Mr & Mrs Edison today

Grosvenor P Lowrey
Menlo Park, N.J.,b 10:50 am

Grosvenor P Lowrey1

Both better2 I will call on you at one p.m.

Griffin
Menlo Park, N.J.,b 7:53 p.m.
Grosvenor P Lowrey Esq3

Edison says come. If possible bring Dr. Keyses4 Edison suffering great pain tonight—

S. L. Griffin
NY 11:20 p.m.

Page 649

S. L. Griffin

I will go out about noon Dr Keyes will go by one forty train if possible to get away Edison’s Doctor should meet him5

G. P. Lowrey

L and ALS (telegrams), NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:332–33, 331). Written by Stockton Griffin; letterhead of T. A. Edison. “Date from document, form altered. b”Menlo Park, N.J.,” preprinted.

1. This was sent to Lowrey’s business address, 3 Broad St.

2. Apparently, however, their recoveries were soon troubled by a serious problem with the heating system; a telegram from Edison was sent just after noon to McCormick & Co., a New Brunswick plumbing & heating firm, calling for workmen to be sent immediately lest they should “freeze to death” (DF [ TAEM 16:330]). Later messages indicate that the system was a hot air central heating system with a basement furnace (a type then becoming fairly common in newer middle-class homes) and that adequate registers for delivery of the hot air to the upper floor of the house had not been provided previously. TAE to McCormick & Co., 7 Nov. and 31 Dec. 1878, DF (TAEM 18:520, 580); Cohen 1982, 51–52.

3. This was sent to Lowrey’s residential address, 34 W. 15th St., after Griffin returned from New York.

4. Probably physician Edward Keyes, a professor at Bellevue hospital in New York who was particularly noted for pioneering work in dermatology. DAB, s.v. “Keyes, Edward Lawrence”; Wilson 1879, 772.

5. The following morning Lowrey wired Griffin that he and Keyes would come out on the 10:55 train, and Griffin on Edison’s behalf telegraphed Dr. Leslie Ward to meet them. DF (TAEM 16:345).

  • To Grosvenor Lowrey

Menlo Park, N.J.a Oct 29, 1878

Dear Sirb

Referring to the power of attorney which I have given to you under date Oct 17—18781 to sell all my interests in my inventions for Electric light for Great Britain, and to conversations in which you have informed me of your proposition to interest an important banking house of New York and their correspondents in Europe to sell those rights in England I now have to say that I approve the policy adopted by you which I understand to be as follows substantially; you are to select a suitable banking house and induce them to undertake]c sale of these patents in partnership with me in order that I may have the utmost benefit of their skill, judgment and facilities without having occasion to fear that they may have some ulterior interest different from my own— Leaving you Page 650 to secure the arrange[ment]c properly according to this principle I hereby authorize you to retain one half the net pro[fits]c of all compensation which may be paid for said patents whether in the form of royalties or present compensation or otherwise, and [?]° of this you are to satisfy the claims of [this?]c banking house and all their agents so as to leave me after the payment of the exp[enses]° of taking out patents and bringing out, exhibiting, and disposing of the inventions in receipt of one half the net result. In short the Banking house which you may choose, is to be made strictly a partner with me in all respects and to the fullest extent with all the advantages & mutual obligations resulting from that relation.

I shall expect you through your friends to satisfy any reasonable claim made by Col. Gouraud for any services which he may have rendered, desiring you to be not only just to him but to save me from any fair cause of complaint by him; this to be treated as one of the expenses/ For the purpose of making this arrangement secure against my death or any accidental cause which might (after the Banking house on the other side shall have announced to the public that they are authorized to bring out this invention) occur to put it out of their power to keep this promise I will execute such further papers or conveyances to yourself and Mr Egisto P. Fabri in trust to sell and deliver the same in accordance with the engagements of your substituted attorney on this other side as may be required.c I leave you to negotiate the minor details of which we have spoken including the mafjter of advances for expenses and for my journey to England to superintend the setting up of the light. I will make the same conveyance to the English Compy that I have to the Edison Electric light Company of New York ie all inventions made within five years to be conveyed without further compensation than that to be at present agreed upon and the Company or [purchaser?]c to have the first option at a price to be fixed by arbitration to take any inventions or improvements made after the expiration of the five years and during the continuance of the first patent granted to me and which will be in Great Britain fifteen years. Yours Truly

Thomas A Edison

LS (letterpress copy), NjWOE, Lbk. 3:450 (TAEM 28:879). Written by Stockton Griffin. aPlace from Edison’s laboratory handstamp. bCircled “C” written above. cFaint copy.d”; this to. .. expenses” written by Edison. e”as may be required” interlined above.

1. Not found.

  • From Partrick & Carter

Philadelphia, Oct 29 1878a

Dr Sir =

We have started in and are now making the Voltameters Thermoscopes and Tasimeters,1 and we propose at once to send out a circular to every college in the country = We propose to sell the Tasimeter alone without Galvanometer, please let us know what you think a fair price to charge for them, also for Voltameters & Thermoscopes. please send us a rough sketchb of the kind of circular, and also send us your letter giving us the authority to manufacture and sell them, which we will publish on the circular and will no doubt aid the sale of them much. = 2 We think you are treating us rather bad in way of money as we manufactured them for cash as we supposed, and as there was no profit in it, we think you might send us a check after waiting so long =3 please reply also about the Slit in Tasimeter to be used for spectroscope4

please reply with check And oblige

Partrick & Carter

L, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:342). Letterhead of Partrick & Carter, Practical Telegraphers and Electricians. a“Philadelphia,” and “187” preprinted. bObscured overwritten letter.

1. By early October, Edison had apparently arranged with Partrick & Carter to manufacture and market these devices. Partrick & Carter to TAE, 8 Oct. 1878, DF (TAEM 16:199).

2. Edison had not answered by 7 November, when Partrick & Carter asked him to “please answer our letter and send us your authority for making Tasimeters Thermoscopes etc, we want to get circular out and send to all the colleges.” It is unclear if Partrick & Carter received a reply from Edison before mid-December, when they acknowledged receipt of a postcard from him and indicated that the tasimeters were “almost done.” They also told Edison at that time that they had been waiting to finish the tasimeters before having the circulars prepared. On 14 January, they sent Edison three tasimeters for his inspection and to have the carbon buttons placed in them. They subsequently urged him to return these quickly as they had parties interested in buying them. One of these parties may have been Wolcott Gibbs, professor of chemistry and physics at Harvard University, who complimented Partrick & Carter on their workmanship. However, by mid-March they had sold only one tasimeter. Edison’s response to a letter from Joseph Tingley, professor of natural philosophy at Indiana Asbury University, suggests a reason for the poor sales: “The delicacy of the Tasimeter depends entirely upon the expertness of the manipulator it may be made infinitely delicate The delicacy exceeds our present means of screening it from local heat currents.” Partrick & Carter to TAE, 7 Nov. and 18 Dec. 1878, 14, 18, and 27 Jan. and 14 Mar. 1879; Edison’s marginal note on Tingley to TAE, 5 Feb. 1879; all DF (TAEM 16:405, 525; 49:63, 68, 51:827–29).

3. This apparently refers to money due from the telephones they had manufactured for Edison the previous summer. They had been trying Page 652 to collect this money since mid-August. At the end of that month Edison had sent Sioo at which time James Partrick acknowledged the “small favor thankfully received” with hope for the balance to be sent the following week. On 19 October, Partrick & Carter had written regarding the standard setting for the tasimeter at which time they asked him for a check for $304.50 “as we are sadly in want, while you are revelling in luxury and forming Electric Gas lighting Companies, who represent their millions.” They were still waiting for the money on 14 November, when Partrick tried a personal approach: “Dr Tom= If you wish to do a friend a favor who is truly in need, please send me the amount due as we are badly off and have got to raise $6000 by the first of December— We are badly off and I appeal to you for help and I hope you will not refuse. . . . We are hard up and cannot tell where to turn unless to you.” This apparently worked as Edison wrote them the same day to say that he would send a check on the 16th. Edison’s accounts show that he paid $300 on 18 November and the remaining $4.50 in December. Partrick & Carter to TAE, 16, 22, and 31 Aug., 19 Oct., 11, 14, and 15 Nov. 1878, DF (TAEM 17:417, 421–22, 442–43; 16:275); Ledger #3:103, Accts. ( TAEM 87:54).

4. On 26 October, Partrick & Carter had written Edison, “We have call for a Tasimeter with good slit for spectroscopic work—what do they want please notify us and we will answer them=answer quick.” DF (TAEM 16:318).

  • Telegrams: Grosvenor Lowrey to I from Stockton Griffin

October 30, 1876a [New York,] 10:00 am

S. L. Griffin

How are the three patients— See “world” this morning—1

G. P. Lowrey
Menlo Park, N.J.,b 10:02 am

G P Lowrey

All doing nicely Edison slept twelve hours solid no pain2

S. L. Griffin

L and ALS (telegrams), NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:346). Written by Griffin; letterhead of T. A. Edison. aDate from document, form altered. b”Menlo Park, N.J.,” preprinted.

1. Lowrey is probably referring to an article in the New York World, titled “Is This the Solution,” which details the Sawyer-Man electric light. Cat. 1241, item 990, Batchelor (TAEM 94:401).

2. Edison nevertheless told others he was still sick and did not go to the lab that day. The next day Edison was up and about but apparently he did not attend the Edison Electric Light Co. directors’ meeting, sending Griffin to New York to meet Lowrey instead. The following day (Friday, 1 November), Dr. Leslie Ward indicated that Edison was well enough that he need not see him again until after the weekend, and Edison concurred. TAE to Howard Butler and TAE to E. N. Bishop, both 30 Oct. 1878; Ward to TAE and TAE to Ward, both 1 Nov. 1878; Page 653 Griffin to Lowrey and Lowrey to TAE, both 31 Oct. 1878; all DF (TAEM 16:347, 365; 18:55–56).

  • From Grosvenor Lowrey

New York, Oct 30th 1878a

My Dear Edison:

I enclose a letter which has been written by my suggestion. Dr Tucker 1 seems a very intelligent, gentlemanly man who says what he wishes to see is yourself rather than the light. He has been waiting here for a week, and I think it would be well to appoint an interview with them for Saturday. You can fix the time and let them know at the Astor House2 about the trains so that they will take but little of your time, probably.

I am going to have Johnson3 go through all the Sawyer, and Sawyer-Man patents tomorrow. Mr Man,4 who says he he has contributed the mechanical part is a very highly respectable person and of good social standing, whom I am sure would not consciously engage in anything in the nature of a swindle.

Mr Sawyer5 seemed a good talking man, and they both said that the publication showing that you had an electric light with the claims stated in the “Scientific American”6 for them was like a thunder clap to them in as much as they consider everything which has been described as being used as being also covered by their patents.

I asked their attorney’s name but Sawyer declined to give it; he said however it was not Dickerson.7 We have already retained Dickerson some days ago.

I am going to start a journal of all the foreign business so that whoever goes abroad shall have a complete history of it. I have therefore asked Mr Goddard,8 the Secretary of the domestic company, to go over on Friday and make copies of everything in your letter books or on your files relating to foreign matters. Very Truly

G. P. Lowrey K[ent]

L, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:49). Written by Rockwell Kent; letterhead of Porter, Lowrey, Soren & Stone, Attorneys & Counsellors at Law. •”New York,” and “187” preprinted.

1. Dr. Robert Tooker wrote to Edison on behalf of himself and two associates in the Western Electric Light Co. of Chicago. One of these men was John Barrett, superintendent of the Chicago fire-alarm telegraph, whom Tooker noted “has devoted much time in experimenting with the electric light.” Tooker wrote Edison that “we are well aware of its embryotic condition but have full faith in your ability to bring it to perfection.” Tooker to TAE, 30 Oct. 1878, DF (TAEM 17:1010). Page 654

2. Tooker wrote Edison on Astor House stationery and was apparently staying at the famed hotel on Broadway and Vesey Street.

3. It is unclear if Lowrey meant Edward Johnson.

4. Lawyer Albon Man had become associated with electrician William Sawyer’s experiments on electric lighting in the winter of 1878 and was joint inventor on several patents. Together they formed the Electro-Dynamic Light Co. in the summer of 1878. Man’s testimony, pp. 402–3, Sawyer (¿ Man v. Edison (U.S.), (TAEM 47:9).

5. Electrical inventor William Sawyer, who had for a time been a newspaperman, took out several telegraph patents during the 1870s. Prior to his involvement with Man, he had conducted some electric light experiments while associated with James Flanagan at the Coal and Iron Exchange, receiving his first electric light patents in August 1877. Sawyer’s testimony, p. 972, Sawyer (S Man v. Edison (U.S.), (TAEM 47:297); U.S. Patent Office 1882, part 3, s.v. “Sawyer, W. E.”

6. The Scientific American of 2 November (39:272), which would have been available about ten days previous to that date, included the following description of Edison’s light in an editorial titled “The Electric Light and the Gas Companies.—Remarkable Effect of a New Invention in the Stock Markets”:

It is based on the well-known fact that a wire may be heated by an electric current, the basis of many attempts to accomplish what Mr. Edison claims to have done. The reader may have seen the gas jets of the dome of the Capitol at Washington, lighted by similar means. Over each burner is placed a coil of platinum wire, which, when heated by the electric current, ignites the gas. Mr. Edison uses the coil itself as the source of light, the current sent through it being strong enough to make the coil white hot, or self luminous. The difficulty to be overcome at this point was the liability of the wire to fuse and spoil the light; a difficulty which Mr. Edison claims to have obviated by the introduction of a simple device which, by the expansion of a small bar the instant the heat of the coil approaches the fusing point of platinum, interposes a check to the flow of the current through the coil. This automatic arrangement, in connection with an auxiliary resistance coil, secures, it is said, an even flow of electricity through the coil, and consequently a steady glow of pure light. If this is done economically it is obvious that a marked advance has been made in artificial illumination.

7. Edward Dickerson, Sr., was a technical expert and eminent patent lawyer. He had served as one of the main attorneys for Western Union in the Quadruplex Case, cross-examining Edison for several days. On 31 October, Lowrey told Edison that the Edison Electric Light Co. board of directors “authorized today the employment of Mr Dickerson, as counsel, with authority to employ such experts as he may elect, to examine the state of the art &c &c.” Lowrey also suggested Moses Farmer as expert because of his experience with incandescent lighting. DAB, s.v. “Dickerson, Edward N”; Dickerson’s argument for defendant, Quad. 73.15 (TAEM 10:726–72); Quad. 70.7 and 71.1 passim ( TAEM 9:403–762, 800–817; 10:5–202); DF (TAEM 18:56).

8. Nothing is known of Calvin Goddard apart from his role as secretary of the Edison Electric Light Co.

  • From L. A. Ludwig

N York Oct 30th 78

Dr Sir

The following is the a/c of Phonograph receipts, up to date—as furnished me by Mr Smith—

2 Exhibition at Aspinwal1 Gross $26.75
1 Exhibition at Panama Gross 70.00
1 Exhibition at Punta Arenas [Costa Rica] Gross 28.00
2 Exhibition at San Jose Costa Rica Gross 92.00
1 Private Exhib San Jose Costa Rica Gross 15.00
1 Exhibition at Cartago2 Gross 15.00
$ 246.75a
Deduct 15% for depreciated currency 37.00
$209.75
Due T. A. Edison 15% 31.50

Enclosed please find my check for the amount $31.50 which please acknowledge— Mr Smith says if he had a Phonograph which would give 50 or even 30% better hresults he could triple the receipts— I spoke to you some time since in regard to one of the new ones and you promised to let me have one for $75 net—3 Please therefore pick me out the best working Inst you have on hand & advise me when I can have it & where I can get it—if from Bergmann please give me an order—but if at Menlo Park can you have it securely packed in a convenient box which will do for Transhipment— I should also like to have some information in regard to selling them throughout South & Central America— Can you help me in regard to terms—for how much can I get the $125.00 Instrument (as agent) will it be the same price that I pay you for the one for ourselves personally? Smith asks in regard to the Phonomotor—has it been perfected yet or when is it likely to be?

I applied to Mr Bergmann for 12 Telephones complete— he says he can let me have them if you dont want them— 4 I have today rec’d a telegram from Smith urging their shipment at once & I hope you will be able to let me have the whole dozen— vessels sails about Nov 9th & they should be shipped on the 6th or 7th Subject to your approval Mr Bergmann will I think allow me 30 to 60 days time—although I may not need that much as I expect a considerable remittance in the course of two weeks proceeds of 1 Doz Electric Pens & several Telephones sold in Costa Rica— I shall probably be able to pay for them in 2 weeks time & hope you will be able to accomodate me & inform Mr Bergmann to that effect—he seems Page 656 to think that he would have to pay you your share at once although I understood that you were willing to wait if he was— Smith is endeavoring to Introduce the Telephones into the railroad systems down there & from his despatch of this morning urging their shipment for that purpose I judge he has every prospect of success & hence I am very anxious to get these 12 asked for at once— There are parties down there in Colombia & Central America who are endeavoring to get ahead of us by acquiring from their Govts the exclusive permit to put up Telephones One Robinson is trying this in Colombia—in view of this fact can you not give us the exclusive agency for the Telephone in Central & South America?5 This will enable us to cut those fellows off—advertise ourselves as exclusive agents for your Telephone—& also to apply in each state for these permits to introduce them— You know that Smith is energetic & reliable & likely to do very well in that country—much more so than any one else— we have already ordered 22 Telephones from you—10 of which we have & we would have had more had we been able to get them— I am satisfied that Mr Smith will be able to make a better show for you as the exclusive agent for the region in question than if you sold to any one who applied as their order is ultimately bound to reach you through us— If you decide to let us have this agency will you please notify your selling—”Foreign Agents” here to refer all Central & South American ag enquiries to me— I enclose slip from the Herald relative to Bells patent in Colombia6—the exclusive privilege in question is of more value & is more of a protection to him than half a dozen patents— Hoping to have an early & favorable reply I remain Yours very Truly

L. A. Ludwig

ALS, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 16:351). ‘Overwritten “240.00”.

1. Aspinwall was the former name of Colón, Panama.

2. Though it is unclear if Ludwig is referring to the town in Costa Rica or Colombia, the former is located only fourteen miles southeast of San Jose.

3. On 1 November, Ludwig again wrote Edison about the phonograph, which he indicated would be used only for their exhibitions. Later in the day, he wrote again to say that he had seen Edward Johnson who was willing to furnish one of the $125 phonographs at a discount if Edison would waive his royalty. On 4 November, Stockton Griffin replied that Edison did not want to waive the royalty and suggested that Ludwig make the best bargain that he could with Johnson. DF (TAEM 16:369, 371); Lbk. 3:474 (TAEM 28:900). Page 657

4. Edison replied on 1 November that Ludwig could have any telephones he could get from Bergmann and indicated he would sign an order for them, but that he wanted Johnson to test them before they left Bergmann’s shop. The same day, Ludwig enclosed an order for twelve box telephones to be sent to T. J. Smith at Punta Arenas. In his letter to Ludwig of 4 November, Griffin enclosed an order to Bergmann for ten telephones and on 7 December, Ludwig wrote that he had obtained these telephones from Bergmann and would send Edison his royalty. On 26 December he sent a royalty check for twelve telephones and two dozen carbon buttons, paying ten dollars per telephone and ten cents per button for a total of $122.40. DF ( TAEM 16:370–71; 19:989, 994); Lbk. 3:466, 474 (TAEM 28:892, 900).

5. In his 1 November letter, Edison told Ludwig, “Cant possibly let you have exclusive agency, or rights, but as you are the only one selling the instruments there, I will put all I can in your hands.” Lbk. 3:466 (TAEM 28:892).

6. Not found.

  • From Porter, Lowrey, Soren & Stone

New York, Oct a 30th 1878a

Dear Sir:

Mr. Lowrey directs me to send you a few hurried notes of a conversation had with Mr Sawyer this morning Yrs Very Respy

E W Griffiths1

ENCLOSUREb

Notes of a conversation with Sawyer this morning— G.P.L.c

Sawyer-Man Electric Light

They claim to have patents for

I Utilizing the carbon point without consuming it

II Regulating the amount of light from taper up: for dividing the amount of Electricity

III For passing the current by certaind lights so that the resistance offered by one light will not materially affect the others in the circuit

Mr Sawyer had made, more than a year ago, a burner in which he made use of platinum wire to produce the light, a shunt by means of a magnet, which with the increase in the current of electricity closed allowing the over-plus to pass off, thus preventing the fusing of the metal.

They claim to have patents covering all these things, and all means by which the amount of light can be regulated, by which platinum wire can be utilized, by which an over-flow Page 658 can be had of the over-plus electricity.

They (or Sawyer) had seen a lamp in which the lengthening of the platinum wire or a wire by expansion’ was made to work as a means of regulating the amount of electricity.

Mr Sawyer claims partly by patented devices, and partly by secrets (which he will patent if anybody finds them out) to have discovered a means of making carbon incandescent without consuming it— He claims that he has tried and abandoned all effort to get light from the incandescence of metals because he found it it isf so much more economical of power to make carbon incandescentg

L, NjWOE, DF (TAEM 18:51). Letterhead of Porter, Lowrey, Soren & Stone, Attorneys & Counsellors at Law. a“New York,” and “187” preprinted. bEnclosure is a D in an unknown hand. cSentence written by Lowrey. dInterlined above by Lowrey. e“or . . . expansion” interlined above by Lowrey. e“it is” interlined above by Lowrey. fParagraph written by Lowrey.

1. Unidentified.

  • To Lemuel Serrell

[Menlo Park,] Oct 31 [18738

Dear Sir

Please make out a list of all US patents from the earliest ages to the present time on Electric light and send for them for me Want them right off. Also on magneto machines Charge to Edison Electric light Co—

I would like at once official Gazette Sept nth 1877 Sawyers E light No 195 174 July 16. 77— Very Truly

T. A. Edison G[riffin]

L (letterpress copy), NjWOE, Lbk. 3:465 (TAEM 28:891). Written by Stockton Griffin.

Share