In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

* Ohio State University Core Dossier Outline (Criteria for Tenure) * Cathy Ann Trower Modified slightly from the original Office of Academic Affairs Policies and Procedures Handbook Volume 3, rev. June 2009, http://oaa.osu.edu/OAAP_PHandbook.php 4.1.2.4 Core Dossier Outline Revised: 06/01/09; Edited: 06/01/09 Teaching 1. Undergraduate, graduate, and professional courses taught. List each course taught and clinical instruction (see Courses / Clinical Instruction in Forms Section), including the following information: 1. courses taught by quarter (AU, WI, SP, SU) and year 2. course number, title, and number of credit hours 3. official final course enrollment 4. percentage of course taught by candidate based on proportion of total student contact hours in course o [bull.gif] brief explanation (approximately 250 words) of candidate’s role, if candidate was not solely responsible for course, including GTA supervision, course management, and team teaching 5. indicate whether formal course evaluations were completed by students and/or faculty peers by placing a check mark in the appropriate column If the candidate has not obtained student evaluations in every regular classroom course, explain why this was not done. Such evaluation is required by Faculty Rule 3335-3-35 (C) (14). Do not include in this list extension, continuing education, or other non-credit courses. 2. Involvement in graduate/professional exams, theses, and dissertations + a). Graduate students: list completed and current and include: o i). doctoral students (dissertation advisor): For advisees who have graduated, list name of student, year of graduation, and title of dissertation. Also provide the current position of the former student, if known.Page 224 o ii). master’s students plan A (thesis advisor): For advisees who have graduated, list name of student, year of graduation, and title of thesis. Also provide the current position of the former student, if known. o iii). master’s students plan B (advisor) o iv). doctoral students (dissertation committee member): Do not include service as a Graduate School representative. o v). doctoral students (general examination committee chair) o vi). doctoral students (general examination committee member): Do not include service as a Graduate School representative. o vii). master’s students (thesis committee member) o viii). master’s students (examination committee member) + b). Describe any noteworthy accomplishments of graduate students for whom the candidate has been the advisor of record, for example, publications during or emanating from graduate program, awards for graduate work, prestigious post-docs or first post-graduate positions. + c). Senior honor theses: give name of student, title of thesis, quarter of graduation, and noteworthy outcomes of this mentorship such as publications, presentations, honors or student awards. + d). Describe any noteworthy accomplishments of undergraduate students, in particular related to research, for whom the candidate has been the advisor of record (publications, posters, honors or student awards). 3. Involvement with postdoctoral scholars and researchers. List completed and current postdoctoral scholars and/or researchers under the candidate’s supervision. 4. Extension and continuing education instruction. Summarize briefly the major instructional activities (workshops, non-credit courses) which the candidate has conducted. Identify the candidate’s role in the instruction and the number of participants. 5. Curriculum development. Give specific examples of the candidate’s involvement in curriculum development (role in the design and implementation of new or revised courses); development of new teaching methods or materials (undergraduate, graduate, or professional); creation of new programs. 6. Brief description of the candidate’s approach to and goals in teaching, major accomplishments, plans for the future in teaching. 7. Evaluation of teaching. Brief description of how the candidate has used the evaluation information to improve the quality of instruction. 8. Awards and formal recognition for teaching. List awards the candidate has received for excellence in teaching. Nominations for such awards should not be listed. These awards may include citations from academic or professional units (department/school, college, university, professional associations) which havePage 225 formal procedures and stated criteria for awards for outstanding teaching performance. 9. Academic advising. Brief description of academic advising not included in section 2 under teaching or section 7 under service. Research 1. List of books, articles, and other published papers. Only papers and other scholarly works that have been formally accepted without qualification for publication or presentation, or have actually been published or presented, should be listed in Items a-g below. Works under review must be listed separately in Item j. Use the standard citation style for the candidate’s discipline with authors listed exactly as they are listed on the publication...

Share