The American Military Frontiers: The United States Army in the West, 1783-1900

Preface

xi “to give protection to the citizens of the frontier against the indians and to guard the long line of our Mexican border against robberies by Mexican citizens and indians living in Mexico,” wrote Major general Philip Sheridan in his 1873 annual report for his Division of the Missouri. Recording the many activities of the soldiers of his command, he continued , “to explore unknown territory and furnish escorts to surveying parties for scientific purposes and for projected railroads; to assist and guard the railways already built and other commercial lines of travel; to aid in the enforcement of the civil law in remote places; and to do generally all that is constantly required of our Army in the way of helping and urging forward everything which tends to develop and increase civilization upon the border, and at the same time to protect the indians in the rights and immunities guaranteed them under existing treaties, has been the work of the troops in this military division.”1 Such was a professional soldier’s account of the army’s activities for a single year in the borderlands. Modern scholars rightly shy away from using pejorative phrases like “the advance of civilization” to describe the expansion of the United States from the Appalachian Mountains to the Pacific ocean. nor do we share Sheridan’s assumptions that development equaled progress or that his country’s actions were inherently better than those of other peoples. nonetheless, he accurately described + PreFAce ∂ xii preface the army’s multiple duties in advancing and defending what the United States defined as its national interests.2 the present work argues that military affairs, in their varied dimensions , were of fundamental importance to the American frontiers and that the United States Army, as the federal government’s most visible agent of empire, was central to that experience. Designed to complement earlier works in the Histories of the American frontier series, it seeks to create a narrative synthesis that appeals to scholars as well as a broader literate audience and that both reflects and shapes our understanding of the role of the U.S. Army in the expansion of the nation. Although focusing on the army, the narrative remains multifaceted, for there were many sides to these military frontiers. indians—some of whom fought alongside the army, more of whom fought against the army, and all of whom naturally sought to manipulate martial conditions in a manner that would further their own interests—are central to this story. Moreover, men and women of many backgrounds, races, and ethnic groups were part of these military communities, and their actions affected a similarly diverse civilian population. Acknowledging the multiple worldviews of these groups is essential to understanding the frontier military experience. As a country born in war, the United States would long debate the best means of fashioning military forces suitable to republican government . in drafting the Declaration of independence, thomas Jefferson complained that george iii had quartered “large bodies of armed troops among us,” had allowed the army to dominate local civil authority, and was “transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny already begun.” Moreover, the british people had permitted the king “to send over not only soldiers of our common blood, but Scotch and foreign mercenaries to invade and destroy us.” Sam Adams warned that standing armies must “be watched with a jealouse eye;” republican theorists thus preferred militias, comprised of able-bodied adult, male property holders.3 Wariness about a standing army did not mean that these Americans were pacifists. Responding to the struggle to control the borderlands and reflecting the racism that defined some people as humans and others as something less, colonists had conducted their wars against indians (much like their cousins in europe fought political rebels, infidels, or preface xiii preface ethnic minorities such as the irish) with a ferocity and brutality that would have been considered unacceptable in dealing with other enemies . these encounters, along with the competition for the resources necessary to secure weapons and other needed trade goods from the euro-Americans, also changed the ways that indians fought their wars, with conflict tending to become both more lethal and more intense.4 Despite their misgivings, the Confederation Congress quickly created a small regular army. Serving as the “sword of the republic,” this force would eventually establish Washington’s authority across the north American continent...