In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

1 Introduction The most impressive feature about the present moment in American intellectual history is the relative paucity of traditionalist conservative men of letters. Though the American right, since the Second World War, appears to have been ascendant in politics and intellect, its supposed triumph has, in large measure, come at the expense of traditionalist conservatives who, for much of the twentieth century, labored both to preserve the organic fabric of agrarian communities and to memorialize a dissolving past against the tides of modernism and technological innovation. In fact, contemporary American conservatives , to a degree often surpassing those on the left, routinely champion Enlightenment-inspired notions of moral and material progress and, furthermore , seldom remind a nation, preoccupied with its historical exceptionalism , of the unremitting limitations of human nature. Neoconservative David Brooks, in his 2004 eulogy to Ronald Reagan, offered an instructive example of how remote the dominant strand of contemporary conservatism is from the traditionalist’s veneration of community, his observance of human limits and his skepticism of progress: Of all the words written upon the death of Ronald Reagan, none have recurred more frequently than “optimist.” . . . To understand the intellectual content of Reagan’s optimism, start with American conservatism before Reagan. It was largely a movement of disenfranchised thinkers who placed great emphasis on human frailty and sin, the limitations of what we can know, and the tragic nature of history . . . Reagan described America as a driving force through history, leading to the empire of liberty. He seemed to regard freedom’s triumph as a historical inevitability . . . Unlike earlier conservatives, he had a boyish faith in science and technology. He embraced immigration, and preferred striving to stability . . . But it’s all really about American exceptionalism. Reagan embraced America as a permanent revolutionary force.1 2 Superfluous Southerners If one accepts Brooks’s narrative, Reagan’s greatest accomplishment was that he put the final nail in the coffin of traditionalist conservatism. Rather than opposing the currents of revolution and modernity, which had been the default persuasions of traditionalism since Edmund Burke, the conservative heirs of the “Reagan revolution,” Brooks insists, have transformed themselves into nothing less than the new Jacobins. If Brooks’s astounding claims are correct then American conservatism has been emptied of all meaning and has been thoroughly routed by its modernist adversaries. While Superfluous Southerners is, in part, an attempt to trace the origins of this supposed emptying, it is principally concerned with illuminating the intricacies of the traditionalist conservative imagination in American history. The following is a study of American intellectual history and, in particular , of the boundaries of cultural conservatism in twentieth-century America. Though its principal focus is on southern men of letters ranging from Allen Tate to M.E. Bradford, the study centers their dilemma within the broader contexts of the history of American and Western thought. In numerous respects, the United States persists as what one critic describes as a “microcosm of modernity ”whose intellectual history remains a perpetual stage upon which“modernity is working itself out.”2 This condition has, by and large, been entirely inhospitable to the conservative thinker who, the French existentialist Simone de Beauvoir notes, “says no to modernity, no to the future, no to the living action of the world” even though “he knows that the world will prevail over him.”3 Proceeding from these circumstances, Superfluous Southerners argues that American and especially southern intellectual history affords a singularly appropriate context for considering the fate of the traditionalist humanistic intellectual in the modern world. Accordingly, the account begins with some brief historical reflections on the inherent obstacles to conservative thought in America. While these integral impediments have, by and large, marginalized conservatism in American life, they have also ironically afforded traditionalist conservatives the outlet of self-styled superfluity as a means to challenge, though by no means entirely surmount, the nation’s implicit barriers to the conservative imagination.4 In 1782, the naturalized American writer Jean de Crèvecoeur pondered the exceptionalism of American culture and the nature of the “new” American, who he described as “either a European or the descendent of a European” with a “strange mixture of blood” that “can be found in no other country.” In large measure, the French-born farmer spoke admiringly of these“new”beings who, he noted,relinquished“ancient prejudices and manners,”and embraced science and democracy in an effort to “finish the great circle” of civilization.5 However, depending upon one’s perspective, Crèvecoeur’s observation...

Share