-
Conclusion
- Ohio University Press
- Chapter
- Additional Information
Conclusion “Conser vation, ”a ld ol eopoldoncequipped,“isabirdthatfliesfaster thantheshotweaimatit.”1 Mobilitywasonceoneofthemainadvantages thatanimalshadoverthehumanswhohuntedthemforfoodandprofit, andfewanimalswerefasterandmoreelusivethanthosethatundertooklong migrationseachyear. snares,traps,arrows,harpoons,stampedes,muskets ,andthelikecertainlytooktheirtoll,butthevastmajorityofspecies werenimbleenoughtosurviveandreproduce,despitesomeglaringcases ofextinctionoverthecenturies.Forthepast150years,however,animals havefoundthemselvesstaringdownthebarrelofthemodernscientificindustrial revolution.High-poweredrifles canstrikeeventhefastesta frican mammals,justasdouble-barreledshotgunscandevastateentirebird flocksandgrenade-tippedharpoonscanwipeoutentirewhaleherds.l and usurpationforurbanandagriculturaldevelopmenthasoftenprovedeven moredeadlythantheweaponry,especiallyformigratoryspecies,which dependonmultiplehabitatsatvariouslocationsduringdifferentseasons oftheyearfortheirsurvival.n othingseemstoofferwildlifeprotectionany Conclusion|149 longer—notthedenseforestsandvastsavannasofa frica,notthewideopen prairiesandremoteregionsofn ortha merica,noteventhetreacherous andfrigidpolarwatersofa ntarctica. d uringthefirsthalfofthetwentiethcentury,animalconservationwas allbutsynonymouswithgamecropping,multilateralhuntingregulations, andnatureparks.d iplomaticnegotiationswerelargelyinthehandsofthe majorindustrialandcolonialpowers,whichrespondedinadhocwaysto theproblemsthataroseinsideandoutsidetheirjurisdiction,betheythe overharvestingofivory,horn,andskins(ina frica);thewantondestructiveness ofthemeatpackingandmillineryindustries(inn ortha merica); ortheexterminationistimpulsesofthewhalingbusiness(ina ntarctica). t reatiesemergedinpiecemealfashionafteroneormoregovernmentsrealized thatnationalregulationsdidnotsuffice,andtheagreementstended toremainregionalinscope,evenifmanyconservationistsdreamedofexpanding theirgeographicdomainsatsomepointinthefuture. t hingsbegantochangeafterWorldWarii,whentheUnitedn ations andotherinternationalorganizationsassumedthetaskofnatureprotection worldwide.t henewtreatieshavetendedtobeglobalinscopeand tocodifygeneralrulesofconductforallcountriestofollowregardlessof theirgeographiccircumstancesandeconomicpositions.t henewtreaties alsohavebeenfarmorelikelytofocusontheprotectionandrestorationof entireecosystemsratherthanonthepreservationofcertaingamespecies andfavoritehuntinggrounds.t hreetreatiesinparticularactedasharbingers ofanewapproach:the1971ConventiononWetlandsofinternational importanceespeciallyasWaterfowlHabitat,signedinr amsar,iran(the r amsarConvention),thefirsttreatytofocusaboveallonwetlandrestoration aroundtheglobe(evenifthetermwaterfowlinitstitlewasathrowback totheoldhuntingtreaties);the1973Conventiononinternational t radeinendangeredspecies(Cites ),signedinWashington,d C,thefirst treatydesignedtoreinintheglobaltradeinliveanimalsandanimalparts; andthe1979ConventionontheConservationofMigratoryspeciesofWild a nimals,signedinBonn(theBonnConvention),thefirsttreatydevoted solelytotheprotectionofmigratoryanimalsandtheirhabitatsworldwide. t heoldapproachtoanimalprotectiondidnot,ofcourse,disappear overnight.t he1968a fricanConventionlargelyreiteratedthe1933l ondon Convention,evenifitalsoextendedaprotectivenettoendangered nativeflora(anareaofconservationthatwasalmostwhollyabsentfrom theearlierdiscussions,sinceplantswerenonmigratoryandnotatarget forhunters).t heUnitedstates,meanwhile,continuedtofavorabilateral [3.12.161.77] Project MUSE (2024-04-20 00:32 GMT) 150|TheGameofConservation approachtobirdprotectionwellintothe1970s,signingseparatetreaties withJapan(1972)andthesovietUnion(1976)thatwereremarkably similartotheonessignedearlierwithCanadaandMexico.l ikewise,the iWC has remained the most important agency overseeing the world’s whalestocks,eventhoughmostwhalingenterpriseswentbellyupdecades agoforlackofcetaceanstohunt.t henewapproachtoenvironmental diplomacydidnotemergeimmediately.t hefirstmajorconferencedevoted solely...