In this Book

summary
Essays on the roles played by women in forming American attitudes about benevolence and poverty relief

American culture has long had a conflicted relationship with assistance to the poor. Cotton Mather and John Winthrop were staunch proponents of Christian charity as fundamental to colonial American society, while transcendentalists harbored deep skepticism towards benevolence in favor of Emersonian self-reliance and Thoreau’s insistence on an ascetic life. Women in the 19th century, as these essays show, approached issues of benevolence far differently than their male counterparts, consistently promoting assistance to the impoverished, in both their acts and their writings. 
 
These essays address a wide range of subjects: images of the sentimental seamstress figure in women’s fiction; Rebecca Harding Davis’s rewriting of the “industrial” novel; Sarah Orne Jewett’s place in the transcendental tradition of skepticism toward charity, and her subversion of it; the genre of the poorhouse narrative; and the philanthropic work and writings of Hull House founder Jane Addams. 
 
As the editors of Our Sisters’ Keepers argue, the vulnerable and marginal positions occupied by many women in the 19th century fostered an empathetic sensitivity in them to the plight of the poor, and their ability to act and write in advocacy of the impoverished offered a form of empowerment not otherwise available to them. The result was the reformulation of the concept of the American individual.

Table of Contents

restricted access Download Full Book
  1. Cover
  2. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Frontmatter
  2. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Contents
  2. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Preface
  2. pp. ix-x
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Introduction: Benevolence Literature by American Women
  2. pp. 1-19
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Part I: The Genre of Benevolence
  1. 1. Stories of the Poorhouse
  2. pp. 23-48
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 2. Representing the “Deserving Poor”: The “Sentimental Seamstress” and the Feminization of Poverty in Antebellum America
  2. pp. 49-79
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 3. “Dedicated to Works of Beneficence”: Charity as Model for a Domesticated Economy in Antebellum Women’s Panic Fiction
  2. pp. 80-104
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 4. Reforming Women’s Reform Literature: Rebecca Harding Davis’s Rewriting of the Industrial Novel
  2. pp. 105-131
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Part II: Negotiating the Female American Self through Benevolence
  1. 5. “The Right to Be Let Alone”: Mary Wilkins Freeman and the Right to a “Private Share”
  2. pp. 135-156
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 6. Women’s Charity vs. Scientific Philanthropy in Sarah Orne Jewett
  2. pp. 157-189
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 7. “Oh the Poor Women!”: Elizabeth Stuart Phelps’s Motherly Benevolence
  2. pp. 190-212
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 8. Frances Harper’s Poverty Relief Mission in the African American Community
  2. pp. 213-226
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 9. “To Reveal the Humble Immigrant Parents to Their Own Children”: Immigrant Women, Their American Daughters, and the Hull-House Labor Museum
  2. pp. 227-248
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 10. Character’s Conduct: The Democratic Habits of Jane Addams’s “Charitable Effort”
  2. pp. 249-281
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Selected Bibliography
  2. pp. 283-288
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Contributors
  2. pp. 289-290
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Index
  2. pp. 291-299
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.