Breaking into the Lab: Engineering Progress for Women in Science

References

225 References Abbate, Janet. 1999. Cold war and white heat: The origins and meanings of packet switching. In The social shaping of technology, 2nd ed. Edited by Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wacjman, 351–71. Philadelphia: Open University Press. About.com.Inventors. 2006. Patent point to ponder—Mothers of Invention. Part 3: Women fighting germs, stronger than steel, and nearly me. http://inventors.about. com/library/inventors/blkidprimer6_12w3.htm. Retrieved January 12, 2009. Adams, James D. 2010. Is the U.S. losing its preeminence in higher education? In American universities in a global market, ed. Charles T. Clotfelter. National Bureau of Economic Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Altman, Roberta. 1996. Waking up/fighting back: The politics of breast cancer. Boston: Little, Brown. Ambrose, S., K. Kunkle, B. Lazarus, I. Nair, and D. Harkus. 1997. Journeys of women in science and engineering: No universal constants. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. American Association of University Women. 2000. Tech-savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation. www.awis. org. Retrieved June 23, 2006. American Cancer Center. 2007. Breast cancer cases/Deaths per year (U.S. and world). http://www.imaginis.com/breast-health/breast-cancer-statistics-on-incidence. Retrieved May 7, 2010. American Council on Education (ACE). 2009. The American College President. 2007 edition. http://wwwlacenet.edu/Content/NavigationMenu/ProgramsServices/ CPA/ExecutiveSummary.htm. Retrieved July 13, 2011. Arenson, K. 2005. Little advance is seen in Ivies’ hiring of minorities and women. New York Times, March 1, p. 16. Armstrong, B. and R. Doll. 1975. Environmental factors and cancer incidence and mortality in different countries, with special reference to dietary practice. International Journal of Cancer 15, 617–31. Ashcraft, Catherine and Anthony Breitzman. 2007. Who invents IT? An analysis of women’s participation in information technology patenting. Boulder, CO: National Center for Women in Technology (NCWIT). Aspin, Les. 1993. April. Policy on the assignment of women in the armed forces. Washington , DC: Department of Defense. 226  References Astin, Helen and Linda Sax. 1996 Developing scientific talent in undergraduate women. In The equity equation, ed. C. S. Davis, A. B. Ginorio, C. S. Hollenshead, B. B. Lazarus, P. M. Rayman and Associates. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Babcock, Linda and Sara Laschever. 2003. Women don’t ask: Negotiation and the gender divide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Barnaby, F. 1981. Social and economic reverberations of military research. Impact of Science on Society 31, 73–83. Bar-Tal, D. and Irene Frieze. 1977. Achievement motivation for males and females as a determinant of attributions for success and failure. Sex Roles 3: 301–14. Bartlett, T. 2005. “More time.” Chronicle of Higher Education 52 (2): A-16. Beaumont, Claudine. 2009. G-20: Protesters use Twitter, Facebook and social media tools to organise demonstrations. The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ finance/g20-summit/5090003/G20-summit-Protesters-use-Twitter-Facebook-andsocial -media-tools-to-organise-demonstrations.html. Retrieved May 17, 2010. Berg, Anne-Jorunn. 1999. A gendered socio-technical construction: The smart house. In The social shaping of technology, 2nd ed. Edited by Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wacjman, 301–13. Philadelphia: Open University Press. Berman, Joshua and Amy Bruckman. 2000. The Turing game: A participatory exploration of identity in online environments. Proceedings of Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing (DIAL) 2000. Seattle, WA: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility. Bodker, S. and J. Greenbaum. 1993. Design of information systems: Things versus people. In Gendered by design: Information technology and office systems, ed. J. Owen Green and D. Pain, 53–63. London: Taylor and Francis. Boxer, Marilyn. 2000. Unruly knowledge: Women’s Studies and the problem of disciplinarity . NWSA Journal 12 (2): 119–29. Brainard, J. 2006. Earmarks may skew analysis of spending. Chronicle of Higher Education 52 (35): A-31. Bratteteig, Tone. 2002. Bringing gender issues to technology design. In Feminist challenges in the information age, ed. C. Floyd, G. Kelkar, S. Klein-Franke, and C. P. Limpangog, 91–105. Opladen, Germany: Leske and Budrich. Briggs, Thyra. 2010. More women than men in the first-year class at Harvey Mudd College: How did this happen? University Business. http://www.university business .com/newsletter/vertical/verticalnewss. Retrieved December 16, 2010. Brun, E. 1994. Technology appropriate for women? In Feminist voices on gender, technology , and ethics, ed. E. Gunnarsson and L. Trojer. Lulea, Sweden: University of Technology Centre for Women’s Studies. Bunker Whittington, Kjersten and Laurel Smith-Doerr. 2005. Gender and commercial science: Women’s patenting in the life sciences. Journal of...