In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

>> 227 References Aber, M. S.; Maton, K. I. & Seidman, E. (Eds.). (2011). Empowering settings and voices for social change. New York: Oxford University Press. Alcoff, L. M. (2006). Visible identities: Race, gender and the self. New York: Oxford University Press. Atkinson, P. & Delamont, S. (2006). Rescuing narrative from qualitative research. Narrative Inquiry, 16, 164–172. Balcazar, F. E.; Suarez-Balcazar, Y.; Taylor-Ritzler, T. & Keys, C. B. (Eds.). (2010). Race, culture, and disability: Rehabilitation science and practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett. Barnes, C. (2003). What a difference a decade makes: Reflections on doing “emancipatory ” disability research. Disability and Society, 18, 3–17. Brody, H. (1987). Stories of sickness. New Haven: Yale University Press. Brown, W. (1995). States of inquiry: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press Brownworth, V. A. & Raffo, S. (1999). Restricted access: Lesbians on disability. Seattle: Seal Press. Bury, M. B. (1991). The sociology of chronic illness: A review of research and prospects. Sociology of Health and Illness, 18, 451–468. Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of ableism: Territories, objects, disability, and desire. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Chan, F.; McMahon, B. T.; Cheing, G.; Rosenthal, D. A. & Beyzak, J. (2005). Drivers of workplace discrimination against people with disabilities: The utility of attribution theory. WORK: Journal of Prevention, Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 77–88. Chase, S. E. (1995). Taking narrative seriously: Consequences for method and theory in interview studies. In R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (Eds.), Interpreting experience: The narrative study of lives (1–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Chase, S. E. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edition (651–679). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Chronister, J. A.; Johnson, E. K. & Berven, N. L. (2006). Measuring social support in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 75–84. Clare, E. (1999). Exile and pride: Disabilities, queerness, and liberation. Cambridge, MA: South End Press. 228 > 229 Eiesland, N. (1994). The disabled god: Toward a liberation theology of disability. Nashville , TN: Abbingdon. Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I. Oxford, UK: AltaMira Press. Esterberg, K. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. London: McGraw-Hill. Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis. London: Routledge. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2012). Sex/gender: Biology in a social world. New York: Routledge. Fine, M. & Asch, A. (1988a). Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination , and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 3–22. Fine, M. & Asch, A. (Eds.). (1988b). Women with disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture and politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Fineman, M. A. (2005). The autonomy myth: A theory of dependency. New York: The New Press. Finger, A. (2004). Writing disabled lives: Beyond the singular. PMLA, 120 (2), 610–615. Fisher, A. T.; Sonn, C. C. & Bishop, B. J. (2002). Psychological sense of community: Research, applications, and implications. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 2nd edition (208–226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Foucault, M. (2001). The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the College de France 1981–1982. F. Gros (Ed.) & G. Burchell (Trans.). New York: Picador. Frank, A. (2004). The renewal of generosity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 107-120. Freund, P. (2001). Bodies, disability, and spaces: The social model and disabling spatial organization. Disability & Society, 16, 689–706. Fries, K. (Ed.). (1997). Staring back: The disability experience from the inside out. New York: Plume. Fuss, D. (Ed.). (1991). Inside/Out: Lesbian theories, gay theories. New York: Routledge. Fuss, D. (1995). Identification papers. New York: Routledge. Gamson,W.A.(2002).Howstorytellingcanbeempowering.InK.A.Cerulo(Ed.), Culture andmind:Towardasociologyofcultureandcognition(187–198).NewYork:Routledge. Garland-Thomson, R. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring disability in American culture and literature. New York: Columbia University Press. Garland-Thomson, R. (2002). Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. NWSA Journal, 14, 1–32. Garland-Thomson, R. (2005). Feminist disability studies. Signs, 30, 1557–1587. Garland-Thomson, R. (2011). Misfits: A feminist materialist disability concept. Hypatia, 26, 591–609. Ghai, A. (2006). (Dis)embodied forms: Issues of disabled women. Delhi: Shakti Books. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Gonzalez, M. L. (2008). Getting to know reality and breaking stereotypes: The experience of two generations of working disabled women. Disability & Society, 24 (4), 447–459. 230 > 231 Holstein, J. A. & Gubrium, J. F. (2004). Context...

Share