Notes
N o t e s introduction 1. For a historical overview, see Colin 1965; Gruen 1984; Roman 2005; for economics , David 1997, 95–125. 2. For an attempt at systematization, see Schluchter 1988, 2:38f.; cf. Ekstrand 2000, 103–7, following Brubaker 1984. 3. See Schluchter 1988, 2:22–42; Kippenberg 2001, e.g., 43f. and passim. 4. Cf. Wallace-Hadrill (1997, 12) on the inevitable adaption of rationality. 5. Schluchter 1988, 1:101, 104. 6. For the use of Weber’s typology in historical research, see Kalberg 1980. 7. See Hölkeskamp 1987; Rüpke 2005a, 1419–40. 8. See, e.g., Goar 1972; Brunt 1989; more differentiated: Jocelyn 1976/77. Cf. Watkins 2007 for medieval England. 9. Beard, North, and Price 1998, as well as North 1989 and Beard 1994, indicate problems and point to mutually exclusive hypotheses rather than attempt a narrative in many instances. Rüpke 2007b does not offer more than a sketch. 10. For an earlier attempt, see Rüpke 2005d. 11. E.g., Flaig 2003; cf. Hölkeskamp 2003; Goldberg 2005, 122–24. 12. Goldberg 2005, 81, 113, 127. For an early date for the repetition of Plautine plays, see Deufert 2002, 29–31 (for Casina). 13. See Morgan 1998 for literary education. 14. Lact. Inst. 5.14f. 15. Moatti 1997. 16. The interest of Hubert Cancik (in Cancik 1998) in the history of rationality attests to exceptions. 17. See Habermas 1981, 103f. chapter 1. the background 1. See Gabba 1991, 159; 2000, 17, 21. 2. Cf. Paoletti and Camporeale 2005 for surrounding Etruscan cities. 222 Notes to Pages – 3. Kolb 1981; Coarelli 1983, 1–19. 4. ILLRP 3. 5. Stressed by Veyne, Diogène 106 (1979): 3–29. 6. Coarelli 1983, 56–79. 7. Short critical account: Smith 1996, 161–63. 8. Scott 2009, 9–78. 9. Varro in Plin. NH 35.157. 10. Hesberg 2005, 80–84. 11. Nicolet 1974, 256 dates the final redaction to around 150. 12. Pyrgi (AA.VV.) 1981. 13. Rüpke 2001b. 14. See Winter 1998 for the time of Cicero. 15. Wiseman 2000; earlier Altheim 1930. 16. Smith 2000, 136. 17. Cic. Nat. 1.3, 1.117, 3.5; see below, Chapter 13. 18. Schultz 2006; Šterbenc-Erker (forthcoming). 19. Liv. 6.41. 20. Rüpke 2005a, 1621–23. 21. E.g., Ulf 1982; Torelli 1984. 22. Rüpke 2006a, 45–49 and Rüpke 2011 for the dating of the Roman calendar; see Rüpke 1995b, 170–72 for diverging Italian calendars. 23. Cornell 1995, 81–92; in greater detail, Meyer 1983. 24. Cornell 1995, 105–8. 25. Smith 1996, 159–60. 26. De Cazenove 2000; Simon et al. 2004, 332–40; 359–68 (A. Comella, J. M. Turfa); Schultz 2006, 95–120; Glinister 2006. For such cult places, see Edlund 1987. 27. Izzet 2000. 28. Hesberg 2005, 84–86. 29. I follow Ziolkowski 1992 in referring the temples (and attested cult places) of the Penates and Vica Pota on the Velia to the third century. A dating of the shrine of Minerva Medica before the late fourth century is unsure, as is that of the Carmentae. 30. Ziolkowski 1992, 187–89. 31. The early identification (Piranomonte 2002) seems not to be tenable. 32. See Bouma 1996 for examples. 33. E.g., Dion. Hal. 1.68.2; later frequently despised, though used: Rawson 1989, 441. 34. Gladigow 2005, 62–84. 35. Cf. Smith 2000, 142, 152. 36. Rüpke 1995b, 261–66; see below, Chapter 7. 37. Bernstein, 1998, 25–30. 38. Bruni 2004, no. 29; photo: ThesCRA 2, tab. 93, no. 15. 39. Liv. 1.35.7–9. [18.188.175.182] Project MUSE (2024-04-25 08:26 GMT) Notes to Pages 19–23 223 40. Liv. 7.2.1–12. 41. Bernstein 2007. 42. Dion. Hal. 7.72–73. 43. Plin. NH 8.65; Fest., 340–342 L. 44. Val. Max. 2.4.7. 45. For criticism, see Beard, North, and Price 1998, 52; for an alternative model, Wildfang 2006. 46. Thus Wissowa 1912, 504–5 with the ancient evidence. For criticism and the alternative model, see Beard, North, and Price 1998, 54–58. 47. Liv. 2.2.1; Dion. Hal. 4.74.4. 48. Rüpke 2008, 24–38. 49. ET Um 1.7; Cl 1.1036. 50. Estienne 2005, 67. 51. Beard, North, and Price 1998, 23–24. 52. Smith 1996, 263–68; his projection of the later priestly system into the regal period (260–62) is...
OR
