In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

INDEX 173 Allison, Henry E., 14n, 36n, 51n, 162n Analogies, 1, 16n, 22–26, 106, 171 mathematical versus philosophical, 23–24 Beck, Lewis White, 4n, 27, 36n, 51n, 58n, 122n Bennett, Jonathan, 37n, 48n, 59, 82n, 87–89, 101–2 Causal Principle every-event-some-cause (EESC) interpretation, 36–39, 43–44, 51n, 116 and necessary order, 46–47, 82–87, 93–94, 126–28, 130, 135–36 and necessity, xi–xii, 83–87, 130–36 and regularity, 129, 131, 159, 163–65 repeatability requirement, 39–44, 60, 81, 84, 115–16, 120, 123–26, 128–31, 135–36 same-cause-same-effect (SCSE) interpretation, 37–44, 51, 80–81, 84, 116, 124, 159, 164 Causation Hume’s problem, xi–xiii, xv, 1–2, 26–34, 81 minimal theory of, 136, 165–166 theory of, xiii, 39, 44, 124, 126, 135–36, 153–54, 163–66 Critique of Judgment, xii–xiv, 19–22, 38, 41, 66, 132–3, 135–36, 157, 159, 165–66 Event/Event Strategy, 47–48, 51n, 58–67, 72–73, 89–90, 155, 159–60 Event/Object Strategy, 46–47, 55–58, 81, 86–87, 154, 156n, 157–58 First Analogy, 36, 57–58, 91, 104, 115n Guyer, Paul, 14n, 37n, 48–49, 67n, 70n, 72n, 92–97, 99n Harper, William, 37n, 51n, 58n, 122n, 162–65 Hume, David copy thesis, 5–6, 30–31, 146–47, 151 derivability thesis, 146–47 Hume’s problem, xi–xiii, xv, 1–2, 26–34, 81 Kant’s answer to Hume, xi–xiii, xv, 1–2, 26–28 32–34, 43, 81, 137–151 separability thesis, 30–31, 148–149, 151 Hypothetical use of reason, 40–41 Imagination, xii, 8, 11–12, 105, 134–35, 141 Irreversibility, 47, 51–52, 55, 57–58, 75–102, 112–14, 154–57, 161 Justification Strategy, 48–49, 51n, 67–73, 92, 96–97, 155, 159–60 Kant’s examples house, xv, 41, 50, 54, 56–57, 60–62, 70, 75, 89, 97–103, 110–117, 121–22, 127, 154–156, 161 leaden ball and cushion, 41, 61–62, 155–56 ship floating downstream, xv, 41, 50, 54, 56–57, 60–62, 70, 75, 89–92, 94–102, 111–18, 121, 127, 130, 132, 137, 154–56, 161–62 water filling the glass, 41, 155–56 water freezing, xv, 50, 58, 60–61, 70, 95, 103, 117–18, 121, 123–25, 130, 137 Kemp Smith, Norman, 4n, 5n, 36n, 51n Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von, 2–5, 7–9 174 INDEX Lovejoy, Arthur O., 37n, 45–46, 52–55, 76–81, 90n, 153–55 Mathematics, 23, 33, 140n, 142–46 Meerbote, Ralf, 37n, 58n, 122n, 162n, 163n Melnick, Arthur, 37n, 47–48, 59–60, 62–65, 80n, 89–92, 96 Metaphysical Deduction, 2, 13 Object of experience, 7–8, 50–51, 57, 103–104, 119, 127, 130, 139–40, 146, 160–65 Object of Experience Strategy, 42–43, 50–52, 60, 103–104, 146, 156–158, 160–65 Object of representations, xv, 42–44, 50, 54, 80, 103, 107–130, 137–39, 146–47, 160–65 Possibility of experience, 15–19, 24n, 33, 68–69, 73, 108, 120n, 130, 135, 140–42, 158–60, 165 Principles constitutive function of, 60, 69–70, 126, 133, 160, 165 constitutive principle, xiv, 16–19, 21–22, 38–44, 59–60, 69–70, 126–27, 158–60, 164–65 constitutive principle of reason, 19 principles of understanding and principles of reason, 1, 16–22, 41, 67n, 158–60, 166 regulative function of, 43–44, 60, 126, 133, 159, 165 regulative principle, xiv, 16–22, 41, 66, 69, 126–27, 131, 158–60 Prolegomena, xi–xii, 29, 135, 142–43, 145 Schemata, 8–13, 15, 25–26, 105–107, 116, 162, 168 Schematism, 1–13, 15, 44, 104–107 Second Analogy’s context within the Critique of Pure Reason, xiv, 1–16, 22–26 Strawson, P. F., 37n, 46–47, 55–58, 81–87, 154, 156–58 Subject to a rule, 43–44, 50–51, 103–130, 138–39, 147, 161–62 Transcendental Deduction, 1–2, 13–17, 24, 60, 70, 104, 109, 117, 133, 160 Transcendental proof, 32–34, 120, 130–31, 136–146, 158 Transcendental realism, 55 Van Cleve, James, 37n, 49n, 58n, 122n Veridical Strategy, 45–46, 52–55, 76–81, 154–55, 159n Watkins, Eric, 65, 72, 140 Wolff, Christian, 45, 53 Wolff, Robert Paul, 36n, 82n, 100–102, 154 ...

Share