-
References
- Penn State University Press
- Chapter
- Additional Information
references Acton, H. B. 1967. ‘‘George Berkeley.’’ In vol. 1 of The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Paul Edwards. New York: Macmillan. Acworth, Richard, ed. 1971. ‘‘Locke’s First Reply to John Norris.’’ The Locke Newsletter 2:7–11. Adams, Robert Merrihew. 1975. ‘‘Where Do Our Ideas Come From?’’ In Innate Ideas, ed. Stephen Stich, 71–87. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Alexander, Samuel. 1908. Locke. London: Constable. Alston, William. 1976. ‘‘The Representative Function of Ideas in Locke.’’ Unpublished manuscript. Anderson, Robert. 1966. Hume’s First Principles. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Anonymous. [1705] 1996. A Philosophick Essay Concerning Ideas, According to Dr. Sherlock ’s Principles. New York: AMS Press. Aristotle. 1984. Complete Works of Aristotle. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Armstrong, D. M. 1960. Berkeley’s Theory of Vision. New York: Cambridge University Press. ———. 1997. A World of States of Affairs. New York: Cambridge University Press. Arnauld, Antoine. 1990. On True and False Ideas. Trans. Elmar J. Kremer. Lewiston, N.Y.: Edwin Mellen. Arnauld, Antoine, and Pierre Nicole. 1996. Logic; or, The Art of Thinking. Trans. and ed. Jill Vance Buroker. New York: Cambridge University Press. Atherton, Margaret. 1990. Berkeley’s Revolution in Vision. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Augustine. 1993. On Free Choice of the Will. Trans. Thomas Williams. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett. Ayers, Michael. 1991. Locke: Epistemology and Ontology. New York: Routledge. ———. 1992. ‘‘Are Locke’s ‘Ideas’ Images, Intentional Objects, or Natural Signs?’’ In John Locke: Theory of Knowledge, ed. Vere Chappell, 153–86. New York: Garland. Belfrage, Bertil. 1987. ‘‘A New Approach to Berkeley’s Philosophical Notebooks.’’ In Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley, ed. Ernest Sosa, 217–30. Boston: D. Reidel. Bennett, Jonathan. 1971. Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes. New York: Oxford University Press. ———. 1979. ‘‘Analytic Transcendental Arguments.’’ In Transcendental Arguments and Science, ed. Peter Bieri, Rolf P. Horstmann, and Lorenz Krüger, 45–64. Dordrecht : D. Reidel. ———. 1996. ‘‘Ideas and Qualities in Locke’s Essay.’’ History of Philosophy Quarterly 13:73–88. ———. 2001. Learning from Six Philosophers. 2 vols. New York: Oxford University Press. Berkeley, George. 1948–57. The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Ed. A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop. 9 vols. London: Nelson. 270 references ———. 1975. Berkeley: Philosophical Works, Including the Works on Vision. Ed. Michael Ayers. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield. ———. 1987. George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction. Ed. Bertil Belfrage. Headington , U.K.: Doxa. Berman, David. 1986. ‘‘Berkeley’s Quad: The Question of Numerical Identity.’’ Idealistic Studies 16:41–45. ———. 1999. Berkeley. New York: Routledge. Bird, Alexander. 2001. ‘‘Review of Dispositions: A Debate and Dispositions.’’ The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52:137–49. Biro, John. 1993. ‘‘Hume’s New Science of the Mind.’’ In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, ed. David Norton, 33–63. New York: Cambridge University Press. Bracken, Harry. 1963. ‘‘Berkeley and Malebranche on Ideas.’’ The Modern Schoolman 41:1–15. Broad, C. D. 1975. Leibniz: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brook, Richard J. 1973. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Browne, Peter. 1976. The Procedure, Extent, and Limits of Human Understanding. New York: Garland. Brykman, Geneviève. 1987. ‘‘Berkeley on ‘Archetype.’’’ In Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley, ed. Ernest Sosa, 103–12. Boston: D. Reidel. ———. 1997. Berkeley et le cartésianisme. Nanterre: University of Paris X. Chappell, Vere. 1986. ‘‘The Theory of Ideas.’’ In Essays on Descartes’ ‘‘Meditations,’’ ed. A. O. Rorty, 177–98. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ———. 1994. ‘‘Locke’s Theory of Ideas.’’ In The Cambridge Companion to Locke, ed. Vere Chappell, 26–55. New York: Cambridge University Press. Church, R. W. 1970. A Study in the Philosophy of Malebranche. Port Washington, N.Y.: Kennikat Press. Cook, Monte. 1974. ‘‘Arnauld’s Alleged Representationalism.’’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 12:53–62. ———. 1996. ‘‘Descartes and the Dustbin of the Mind.’’ History of Philosophy Quarterly 13:17–33. Craig, E. J. 1968. ‘‘Berkeley’s Attack on Abstract Ideas.’’ Philosophical Review 77:425–37. Cummins, Phillip. 1975. ‘‘Berkeley’s Ideas of Sense.’’ Noûs 9:55–72. ———. 1996. ‘‘Hume on Qualities.’’ Hume Studies 22:49–88. Dancy, Jonathan. 1987. Berkeley: An Introduction. New York: Basil Blackwell. Daniel, Stephen. 2000. ‘‘Berkeley, Suárez, and the Esse-Existere Distinction.’’ American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74:621–36. ———. 2001a. ‘‘Berkeley’s Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas.’’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 39:239–58. ———. 2001b. ‘‘Edwards, Berkeley, and Ramist Logic.’’ Idealistic Studies 31:55–72. Descartes...