In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

notes Series Editors’ Foreword 1. richard jolly, Louis Emmerij, and Thomas G. Weiss, UN Ideas That Changed the World (bloomington: indiana university press, 2009). 2. craig n. murphy, The UN Development Programme: A Better Way? (cambridge: cambridge university press, 2006); d. john shaw, UN World Food Programme and the Development of Food Aid (new york: palgrave, 2001); maggie black, The Children and the Nations (new york: unicEF, 1986); and maggie black, Children First: The Story of UNICEF (oxford: oxford university press, 1996). 3. Thomas G. Weiss, Tatiana carayannis, Louis Emmerij, and richard jolly, UN Voices: The Struggle for Development and Social Justice (bloomington: indiana university press, 2005). 4. Louis Emmerij, richard jolly, and Thomas G. Weiss, Ahead of the Curve? UN Ideas and Global Challenges (bloomington: indiana university press, 2001), xi. Introduction 1. see david c. Ellis, “on the possibility of ‘international community,’” International Studies Review 11, no. 1 (2009): 1–26. 2. rorden Wilkinson, “Global Governance: a preliminary interrogation,” in Global Governance: Critical Perspectives, ed. rorden Wilkinson and steve hughes (London: routledge, 2002), 6. 3. robert Gilpin, Global Political Economy (princeton, n.j.: princeton university press, 2001), 388–389. 4. randall d. Germain, “Global Financial Governance and the problem of inclusion,” Global Governance 7, no. 4 (2001): 421. 5. see ramesh Thakur, andrew F. cooper, and john English, eds., International Commissions and the Power of Ideas (Tokyo: un university press, 2005). 6. Louis W. pauly, “What new architecture? international Financial institutions and Global Economic order,” Global Governance 7, no. 4 (2001): 482. 7. high-level panel on Threats, challenges and change, A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility (new york: un, 2004); millennium development project, Investing in Development: A Practical Plan to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals (new york: undp, 2005); and kofi a. annan, In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All (new york: un, 2005). 8. “collective” is an adjective that means “group-based.” This modifier may imply universal or global participation (for example, the un as a collective security organization ), but it may imply a narrower scope of participation (for example, naTo is a collective defense organization). see stephen F. szabo and douglas T. stuart, eds., Discord and Collaboration in a New Europe: Essays in Honor of Arnold Wolfers (Lanham, md.: university press of america, 1994). 342 notes to PAges 6–12 9. see Ernst-otto czempiel, “Governance and democratization,” in Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, ed. james n. rosenau and Ernstotto czempiel (cambridge: cambridge university press, 1992), 250–271. also see Leon Gordenker and Thomas G. Weiss, “pluralizing Global Governance: analytical approaches and dimensions,” in NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance, ed. Leon Gordenker and Thomas G. Weiss (boulder, colo.: Lynne rienner, 1996), 17–47. 10. inis L. claude, jr., Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Prospects of International Organization (new york: random house, 1956); and inis L. claude, jr., “peace and security: prospective roles for the Two united nations,” Global Governance 2, no. 3 (1996): 289–298. 11. This notion was first spelled out in Thomas G. Weiss, Tatiana carayannis, and richard jolly, “The ‘Third’ united nations,” Global Governance 15, no. 1 (2009): 123–142. it also figures prominently in the summary volume by richard jolly, Louis Emmerij, and Thomas G. Weiss, UN Ideas That Changed the World (bloomington: indiana university press, 2009). 12. For an account of the special positions of nGos relative to states and international organizations, see volker heins, Nongovernmental Organizations in International Society: Struggles over Recognition (new york: palgrave macmillan, 2008). 13. see andrew s. Thompson and james W. st. G. Walker, eds., Critical Mass: The Emergence of Global Civil Society (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier university press, 2008). 14. john Gerard ruggie, Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights: Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises (new york: un, 2008), 3. 15. Thomas s. kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (chicago: university of chicago press, 1970), 42. 16. For an argument on how shaming is an effective instrument that underpins the efficacy of the European human rights regime, see andrew moravcsik, “Explaining international human rights regimes: Liberal Theory and Western Europe,” European Journal of International Relations 1, no. 2 (1995): 157–189. For a slightly different interpretation of the domestic impact of norms embedded in the European human rights regime, see jeffrey T. checkel, “international norms and domestic politics: bridging the rationalist-constructivist...

Share