In this Book

summary
Approaching linguistic science from the combined viewpoint of the philosophy of science and the theory of graphic design, this book offers a radically new treatment of linguistic theory and the history of linguistics. The author analyzes graphic representation, or diagramming, in terms of form and meaning, proposes a taxonomy of linguistic models that cuts across other classifications of linguistic theory, and shows that, like models in the biological and physical sciences, graphic representation has performed and continues to perform a heuristic function for the development of theory in linguistics. This view leads to a reinterpretation not only of the place and function of graphic representation in theoretical linguistics today but also of the history of linguistics. The book suggests new directions for models in linguistics: by making use of the tools furnished by the principles of graphic design, within the context of the principles of the philosophy of science, linguistics can exploit the influence of graphic representation on theory. This is illustrated by two new three-dimensional models for linguistics designed to replace the two principal models now current—the matrix and the tree—both two-dimensional. An analysis of the ways in which new models grow out of old ones and improve upon them demonstrates how graphic representation can furnish linguistics with models and how the design of such models can be improved by applying the principles of graphic design. The view presented here has particular significance for the development of transformational-generative theory.

Table of Contents

Cover

Half Title Page

pp. i-ii

Title Page

pp. iii

Copyright

pp. iv

Contents

pp. v-vi

Foreword

pp. vii-viii

Half Title Page

pp. ix-x

Introduction

pp. 1-5

One: Tree diagrams

pp. 6-38

Two: Matrix diagrams

pp. 39-55

Three: Box diagrams

pp. 56-75

Four: Graphic representation and linguistic science

pp. 76-101

Five : Graphic representation and graphic design

pp. 102-135

Six: New directions for models in linguistic theory

pp. 136-168

Notes

pp. 169-176

Bibliography

pp. 177-188

Index

pp. 189-196
Back To Top